Yes, but none to do with QPR.So. Any transfer rumours.....................
Yes, but none to do with QPR.So. Any transfer rumours.....................
Does anyone know the type of football Blackpool played (Hoofball, Passing game) when Ollie got promoted them promoted?
Actually a few Durbar.... a fast winger from Chelsea, Bristol also interestedYes, but none to do with QPR.
with the very latest from my ITK source http://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/Sport/Football/Championship/QPR 
Actually a few Durbar.... a fast winger from Chelsea, Bristol also interested
French striker...gone quiet ....so fingers crossed
The Barnsley R back....Huddersfield interested
All 3 look OK on paper....we will see

Yes, destabilize a winning team to see if the can get us out of the 1st division.. Why not wait till we were safe? He needs to go.
I completely get your point SH; however you missed mine... he had a policy of continually changing players and playing with formations while losing match after match - he didn't change that policy and kept losing matches ('doing the same thing and expecting a different result'); he looked headless, maybe even arrogant/stubborn... it was all at a great cost even now. You would normally build on success, perhaps making small changes to look for improvement - not throw the baby out with the bath water. I had the same views at the time this was all happening, as did many on here. Let alone the point that fans were paying hard-earned money to watch experimentation and failure when we should have been aiming for the highest position possible.
After the time he has had with the team he should know the areas that need strengthening ... there are plenty here that could have told him. Practice pitches are for drilling new formations and experimenting, 'Saturdays' are for winning games and points (in style if at all possible).
Anyway, a new season ahead, lets see how our new signings will fit in and what Holloway is going to do to improve the disaster of last season.
It just seems the argument is a bit damned of you do and damned if you don't.
I felt at the time that the changes to the squad appeared to be more of an experimentation - they were a chance to look at the entire squad in preparation for assessing the retained list and informing us as to where we needed to strengthen for next season.
They could mix it up, Charlie Adam was a Premier League quality midfielder who ran the show for them, creating and scoring goals, especially at set pieces. DJ Campbell was their main goalscorer along with Brett Ormondroyd and Gary Fletcher-Taylor. Once promoted they brought in Matt Phillips and Tom Ince so they were never short of pace or firepower. It makes you wonder how we can be so useless when Ollie could create such an entertaining side but the key player was Adam both in the Championship and Premier League...
Agreed ..... This is why with Adams being available, we should snap him up.
The club must realise you can't have a team of cheap young novices and make an impression on the table.
We need a blend of talent sprinkled older wise heads who know what it takes to win the league.
Agreed...and although Ollie might "interest" him in one last project...even then I cannot see him fitting in with our wage structure, although I think he would fit in with our new found ethosWould like to get Adams, but as you say 'He's on Premier League money'. So can't see it happening.
A question re Chelsea loanees.
You don't need me to recap QPR:Chelsea history. Anyone not sure, come to the QPR: Villa game.
Does the animosity extend higher up the club's management?
If Chelsea have the choice of loaning Callum Hudson-Odoi to us or Bristol City, would they naturally favour Bristol City just because we are QPR?
I hope you are right. It is what I would have expected.No, these guys are professionals. Of course there will be an awareness of animosity between fans but unless something has an impact commercially they wouldn't give a shiite.


I hope you are right. It is what I would have expected.
That's not anti-Muslim is it?!![]()
If he is good then it is not a good deal. We are in a such a poor state with regard to quality football players that we need to keep any talent we have.Have said this before....for an untested youngster. 1.5 million, plus add-ons is good business.
He is unlikely to set the world on fire next season in our team....and then his value will fall
http://www.westlondonsport.com/qpr/qpr-accept-offer-everton-bowler
Everton will pay an initial £1.5m for the 18-year-old winger, with the deal potentially worth £4.25m with add-ons.
Bowler is now set to hold talks with the Merseyside club.
Rangers turned down previous offers from Everton for Bowler, but he rejected the offer of a new contract and talks between the two clubs therefore continued as it became increasingly likely the player would leave.
He is under contract at Loftus Road until the summer of 2018, having signed an 18-month professional deal in February, and his reluctance to commit his long-term future to the club made his departure this summer almost inevitable.
Bowler, who was on Fulham’s books before joining QPR four years ago, made his senior debut when he came on as a substitute against Norwich