Transfer Embargo

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

What’s gonna happen

  • Temporary blip

  • Complete ****ing collapse

  • It’ll all be ok

  • Relegation


Results are only viewable after voting.
Headlines from the CFRP panel would seem to indicate that Hull’s legal arguments lacked merit - ouch! This is a polite way of saying that there was no good reason why Hull appealed the original decision to impose the transfer embargo and subsequent fees restrictions… and the CFRP believed that Hull knowingly defaulted on payment obligations and only resolved them under pressure from the EFL.

MoH
 
Total club arrears under consideration amounted to £830K over 311 days. Defaults were caused by ‘cash-flow’ issues not administrative error (as was the case with Oxford’s 2024 case). Breach considered ‘serious’.

if Acun has not already, he needs to implement a new financial discipline at the club establishing better board-level oversight of agreed payment schedules with other clubs and creditors .(outside of the owner).

MoH
 
We have to learn from this by repairing our relationship with the EFL and restoring our credibility as a club in the Championship and avoid triggering the suspended sanction.

MoH
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gone For A Walk
Not sure if this has been posted elsewhere on this forum but here is the CFRP Decision.

If the attachment is not opening you can access it on the EFL website under Governance - Judgments & Decisions.

MoH

No wonder it took so long to release, there's a hell of a lot of detail in there and arguments about technicalities and interpretation.

Basically though, it just says we took the piss and didn't get away with it.