Tottenham vs Arsenal

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Super Harry Kane said:
Haha, no. Lincoln College first time. Pembroke second time. Face it, I'm genuinely not lying.
Click to expand...
I went to imperial. Expensive. Only just paid the debt off. And that was when fees were lower.

Now stop talking **** on an Internet forum about football. No one can be that biased. You've been banned from several board already. Get a grip.
 
Mate, how good is Imperial? My dad keeps saying they're on par with Oxbridge now, but is that really true? Or is he just saying that to make me feel better lol.
 
Super Harry Kane said:
Mate, how good is Imperial? My dad keeps saying they're on par with Oxbridge now, but is that really true? Or is he just saying that to make me feel better lol.
Click to expand...
Comparing universities as a whole is worthless. Compare the specific subject you've chosen between the universities. Oxford is rubbish for some courses for example (well not rubbish, but nowhere near a lot of other unis). What is it you're doing?
 
cini65 said:
Comparing universities as a whole is worthless. Compare the specific subject you've chosen between the universities. Oxford is rubbish for some courses for example (well not rubbish, but nowhere near a lot of other unis). What is it you're doing?
Click to expand...
I think he studying for a Masters in delusion in which case Oxford is best. Many people graduating from there think they can run the country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cini65
Super Harry Kane said:
Maths. Straight Maths.
Click to expand...

Much of a muchness. A degree from either and you're set. Depends if you're well off and like London. I regretted living in London on a student loan. No campus, just buildings to wander to in south ken.

If all you're interested in is prestige then either will do. Otherwise just visit the places and see which feels nicer and work our how much more debt you'll be in going to imperial.

But if you think spurs have a 9-2 player swing in their favour you'll struggle with maths anywhere... :D
 
cini65 said:
Much of a muchness. A degree from either and you're set. Depends if you're well off and like London. I regretted living in London on a student loan. No campus, just buildings to wander to in south ken.

If all you're interested in is prestige then either will do. Otherwise just visit the places and see which feels nicer and work our how much more debt you'll be in going to imperial.

But if you think spurs have a 9-2 player swing in their favour you'll struggle with maths anywhere... :D
Click to expand...

<laugh>
 
Spurs or Sex? said:
Based on this season's form:

Lloris > Ospina - 1-0

Bellerin > Walker - 1-1
Koscielny > Vertonghen - 1-2
Mertesacker > Dier - 1-3
Rose > Monreal - 2-3

Bentaleb = Coquelin - 3-4 - both been solid and consistent.
Ramsey > Mason - 3-5 - only just though.

Sanchez > Chadli - 3-6
Eriksen > Ozil - 4-6
Cazorla > Townsend - 4-7

Kane > Giroud - 5-7

I'd make it 7-5 in Arsenal's favour (unfortunately!), if only we'd have been a better unit at the back then I'd be scoring it differently. It's what's really cost us this season - and is usually the case in most others too!
Click to expand...


Other than the maths that is pretty sound ;)

Edit - oh i see. Its my maths thats ****e
 
Spurm said:
Other than the maths that is pretty sound ;)
Click to expand...

**** sake my maths has always been bad, where have I cocked up? Because I tried double checking it when I posted and actually thought it looked ok <laugh>

EDIT: If you're wondering why the total scores would equal 12 and not 11, it's because I gave a point each for Coquelin and Bentaleb. If that's NOT the reason why the maths is looking dodgy, then well.. Maths can just suck my d....
 
Spurs or Sex? said:
**** sake my maths has always been bad, where have I cocked up? Because I tried double checking it when I posted and actually thought it looked ok <laugh>

EDIT: If you're wondering why the total scores would equal 12 and not 11, it's because I gave a point each for Coquelin and Bentaleb. If that's NOT the reason why the maths is looking dodgy, then well.. Maths can just suck my d....
Click to expand...

I edited in that it was my **** maths just before you got in there :)
 
cini65 said:
I just showed you the squawka comparison a minute ago.

Here it is again http://www.squawka.com/comparison-matrix#premier_league/2014/2015/nacho_monreal/126/126/1736/0/p|premier_league/2014/2015/héctor_bellerín/126/126/3832/0/p|premier_league/2014/2015/kyle_walker/126/126/854/0/p|premier_league/2014/2015/danny_rose/126/126/844/47/p#defence_score/pass_completion/tackles_won/total_duels_%/interceptions/blocks/clearances/defensive_errors#total
Click to expand...
Stats? I'm sure I've told you what a load of old bollocks that game is before.
One quick example is that I currently rate higher than Bobby Zamora on Squawka. I don't have a score and his is -69.
Charlie Austin is clearly much better than Olivier Giroud, too:
http://www.squawka.com/comparison-m...vier_giroud/126/126/115/0/p#total_score#total
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
Stats? I'm sure I've told you what a load of old bollocks that game is before.
One quick example is that I currently rate higher than Bobby Zamora on Squawka. I don't have a score and his is -69.
Charlie Austin is clearly much better than Olivier Giroud, too:
http://www.squawka.com/comparison-m...vier_giroud/126/126/115/0/p#total_score#total
Click to expand...
I agree that stats on their own proven nothing. But MattH seemed to want some stats based evidence.

Bellerin is already a good right back and has the potential to be one of the best in the world in a few years, by which time he'll probably want to move elsewhere. Monreal I haven't been convinced by but has been consistently very strong for a few months now.

Giroud vs Austin? Meh, you could argue that both ways. Austin does what he does with the support of dross behind him. Giroud has Ozil, Sanchez and Cazorla supplying him. Both are quite good strikers, neither top class.
 
cini65 said:
Comparing universities as a whole is worthless. Compare the specific subject you've chosen between the universities. Oxford is rubbish for some courses for example (well not rubbish, but nowhere near a lot of other unis). What is it you're doing?
Click to expand...

Bamber Gascoigne didn't play for Spurs - it was Paul :emoticon-0143-smirk Educated at the university of life <ale>:emoticon-0172-mooni:emoticon-0167-beer:
 
I just don't get the Giroud bashing. I've said all along i think he's a decent player and i'm still standing by that. His goals per minute back me up too, because, you know, stats.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back