I went to imperial. Expensive. Only just paid the debt off. And that was when fees were lower. Now stop talking **** on an Internet forum about football. No one can be that biased. You've been banned from several board already. Get a grip.
Mate, how good is Imperial? My dad keeps saying they're on par with Oxbridge now, but is that really true? Or is he just saying that to make me feel better lol.
Comparing universities as a whole is worthless. Compare the specific subject you've chosen between the universities. Oxford is rubbish for some courses for example (well not rubbish, but nowhere near a lot of other unis). What is it you're doing?
I think he studying for a Masters in delusion in which case Oxford is best. Many people graduating from there think they can run the country.
To paraphrase a movie: "Maths? Just maths? I remember that class, it was right between recess and lunch"
Much of a muchness. A degree from either and you're set. Depends if you're well off and like London. I regretted living in London on a student loan. No campus, just buildings to wander to in south ken. If all you're interested in is prestige then either will do. Otherwise just visit the places and see which feels nicer and work our how much more debt you'll be in going to imperial. But if you think spurs have a 9-2 player swing in their favour you'll struggle with maths anywhere...
**** sake my maths has always been bad, where have I cocked up? Because I tried double checking it when I posted and actually thought it looked ok EDIT: If you're wondering why the total scores would equal 12 and not 11, it's because I gave a point each for Coquelin and Bentaleb. If that's NOT the reason why the maths is looking dodgy, then well.. Maths can just suck my d....
Stats? I'm sure I've told you what a load of old bollocks that game is before. One quick example is that I currently rate higher than Bobby Zamora on Squawka. I don't have a score and his is -69. Charlie Austin is clearly much better than Olivier Giroud, too: http://www.squawka.com/comparison-m...vier_giroud/126/126/115/0/p#total_score#total
I agree that stats on their own proven nothing. But MattH seemed to want some stats based evidence. Bellerin is already a good right back and has the potential to be one of the best in the world in a few years, by which time he'll probably want to move elsewhere. Monreal I haven't been convinced by but has been consistently very strong for a few months now. Giroud vs Austin? Meh, you could argue that both ways. Austin does what he does with the support of dross behind him. Giroud has Ozil, Sanchez and Cazorla supplying him. Both are quite good strikers, neither top class.
Bellerin'll end up at Barca eventually. Good offensive right back who can't defend. Suits them perfectly.
I just don't get the Giroud bashing. I've said all along i think he's a decent player and i'm still standing by that. His goals per minute back me up too, because, you know, stats.
