Replace lascelles longstaff Murphy and Burn with good players and Newcastle will be cooking.
They're quite simply below the standard required for a top side.
Longstaff knows it himself I heard his interview.
Wilson is absolutely first on the list, he's 31 years of age for Christ sake.

A mere baby compared to the 33 year old Trippier then![]()
We kinda did replace Longstaff with Tonali.
Although that's now backfired spectacularly, and with Longstaff's form this season, he doesn't need replacing anyway.
I think he played well Yesterday Tonali .. we have willock back and hopefully Joelinton can find himself because he's looked awful this season.
Ultimately Newcastle are about 4 really top players away which is encouraging.
I think he played well Yesterday Tonali .. we have willock back and hopefully Joelinton can find himself because he's looked awful this season.
Ultimately Newcastle are about 4 really top players away which is encouraging.
Burn longstaff Murphy and Lascelles at far more pressing matters than schar joelinton and miggy.
The latter are actually capable.
Yeah, Tonali has been a bit patchy, but was good yesterday.
Joelinton still working his way back to full form and hopefully will be much better Vs Man U. Willock back now, and Botman back in a few weeks remember, and also Barnes in a month or so.
Injuries are stretching the squad right now, love Isak but he also seems to have the propensity to pick up an injury, and we can't rely on Wilson being fit every game. Gordon is great and gives us options up front but isn't an out and out goal scorer.
Striker cover and midfield cover (Phillips?) is a must in Jan.

Longstaff isn't good enough never has been has never will be ... people need to look at the likes of de bruyne or even rice as a marker... Longstaff is more on par with Brownhill at Burnley
Burn longstaff Murphy and Lascelles at far more pressing matters than schar joelinton and miggy.
The latter are actually capable.
I didn’t even consider Murphy and Lascelles as thought they were a givenAt the end of the day, we will ONLY get players like De Bruyne and Rice when we are seriously competing for the title, not when we're getting 4th place.
I didn’t even consider Murphy and Lascelles as thought they were a given
Didn't realise Antony Gordon was that much smaller than Nick Pope.Posting this early as I'm off to the Earl
You must log in or register to see images
Tbh it shows that Newcastle are one or two years away from having a serious squad.
Depends what your definition of a "serious squad" is.
Can this squad get into the top 4 this season? Yes. Can it win the league cup? Yes. Can it progress beyond this Champions League group? Yes.
Can it win the league? No. Can it win the CL? No.
Compared to City the squad ain't serious, but compared to 2 years ago under Bruce, the squad is deadly serious.
A serious squad doesn't rely on relegation level players.
This squad is not going to finish top 4 regularly and did once simply because Liverpool Tottenham and Chelsea had their worst seasons in a decade all at the same time.
Newcastle are not the 4th best side or squad in the division.
Need a few more top players and are not too many years away.
I was referring to Roly saying the players or the manager don’t have it in them to win these games, despite stuffing PSG in the previous CL game.This site is proper weird. I'm looking back and can't see any complaining or bed wetting.
Are people seriously not allowed to comment on the match if we miss an open goal?
So, if we miss a chance, to not offend some of the grandfathers on here we have to all golf clap?