APT 2
You must log in or register to see images
Open said floodgates...
Not how others are reporting it. Looks like we've been totally screwed over.
In exchange for what I wonder!Yup. Man City have reached an agreement to back down
In exchange for what I wonder!
But only for Man City, who now claim to "acknowledge the current rules". So basically they get away with then agree to close the door behind them.It's too early to know what's really going on... Remember the PL claimed a win last time and got caught lieing in the end.
Whatever the media peddle will favour masters side of events.
He's probably agreed to drop the 115.
But only for Man City, who now claim to "acknowledge the current rules". So basically they get away with then agree to close the door behind them.
Same mate. I think that's what they've agreed. Hence "no further comment" from either side.It doesn't mean they're lawful it just mean something happened in way of agreement.. Man City appear to have simply agreed to drop it, but the question is why.
1. They have been told drop it and we'll let the 115 go or a number of them.
2. They realised they were going to lose and dropped it.
My money is on 1....
Same mate. I think that's what they've agreed. Hence "no further comment" from either side.
It's, don't take us to court and then we won't give you a 20+ point penalty deduction.
Yep, my thoughts exactly. Hopefully our new exec team will be all over this moving forward. I’d be agreeing commercial deals to sponsor literally everything that can be. New stadium, training ground, training kit etc. What’s to stop us signing £50m a year deals sponsor our training socks, £100m a season for someone else to put their logo on the training tops etc. if we can put a logo on Betty the Tea Lady’s coffee stained apron we should be ****ing all over it! Play these ****ers at their own game. Think outside the box and sponsor **** that’s never been sponsored before, that way they can’t say it’s not fair market value as it’s never been done before so we can set the benchmark!It doesn't mean they're lawful it just mean something happened in way of agreement.. Man City appear to have simply agreed to drop it, but the question is why.
1. They have been told drop it and we'll let the 115 go or a number of them.
2. They realised they were going to lose and dropped it.
My money is on 1....
Yep, my thoughts exactly. Hopefully our new exec team will be all over this moving forward. I’d be agreeing commercial deals to sponsor literally everything that can be. New stadium, training ground, training kit etc. What’s to stop us signing £50m a year deals sponsor our training socks, £100m a season for someone else to put their logo on the training tops etc. if we can put a logo on Betty the Tea Lady’s coffee stained apron we should be ****ing all over it! Play these ****ers at their own game. Think outside the box and sponsor **** that’s never been sponsored before, that way they can’t say it’s not fair market value as it’s never been done before so we can se the benchmark!
I think the new CEO will be more 'on it' for that type of thing.Yep, my thoughts exactly. Hopefully our new exec team will be all over this moving forward. I’d be agreeing commercial deals to sponsor literally everything that can be. New stadium, training ground, training kit etc. What’s to stop us signing £50m a year deals sponsor our training socks, £100m a season for someone else to put their logo on the training tops etc. if we can put a logo on Betty the Tea Lady’s coffee stained apron we should be ****ing all over it! Play these ****ers at their own game. Think outside the box and sponsor **** that’s never been sponsored before, that way they can’t say it’s not fair market value as it’s never been done before so we can set the benchmark!