tom english

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Pretty one sided from Tom English ...

Is Lennon the only manager who blames refs when his team loses!

Is he ****!
 
He's right in one aspect tho...

Referees should be interviewed after games (like managers) to face questions/explain decisions.
 
He's right in one aspect tho...

Referees should be interviewed after games (like managers) to face questions/explain decisions.

Would it really make that much of a difference? Take for example, the Cha Du Ri sending off at the weekend. If Murray comes out after the match and says "I sent him off for deliberately preventing a goal scoring opportunity, as in my belief he fouled Lee Wallace", is that really going to convince anyone who thought it was a wrong decision to change their mind?
 
Would it really make that much of a difference? Take for example, the Cha Du Ri sending off at the weekend. If Murray comes out after the match and says "I sent him off for deliberately preventing a goal scoring opportunity, as in my belief he fouled Lee Wallace", is that really going to convince anyone who thought it was a wrong decision to change their mind?

Maybe

Maybe not

I do think they should have the right to make their stance/prove a point or even reply to accusatiosn from managers, players n media!

****, you might even get some honesty... some may even admit to making a mistake here or there.

Will it silence the yahoos - maybe not. Will it give a bit of insight to some, maybe/hopefully.