1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

tom english

Discussion in 'Rangers' started by Girvan Loyal 1690, Mar 29, 2012.

  1. Girvan Loyal 1690

    Girvan Loyal 1690 Nobody's safe now

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    40,526
    Likes Received:
    17,744
  2. Null

    Null Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    34,179
    Likes Received:
    9,757
    Pretty one sided from Tom English ...

    Is Lennon the only manager who blames refs when his team loses!

    Is he ****!
     
    #2
  3. Null

    Null Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    34,179
    Likes Received:
    9,757
    He's right in one aspect tho...

    Referees should be interviewed after games (like managers) to face questions/explain decisions.
     
    #3
  4. OSP

    OSP Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    712
    Likes Received:
    22
    Would it really make that much of a difference? Take for example, the Cha Du Ri sending off at the weekend. If Murray comes out after the match and says "I sent him off for deliberately preventing a goal scoring opportunity, as in my belief he fouled Lee Wallace", is that really going to convince anyone who thought it was a wrong decision to change their mind?
     
    #4
  5. Null

    Null Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    34,179
    Likes Received:
    9,757
    Maybe

    Maybe not

    I do think they should have the right to make their stance/prove a point or even reply to accusatiosn from managers, players n media!

    ****, you might even get some honesty... some may even admit to making a mistake here or there.

    Will it silence the yahoos - maybe not. Will it give a bit of insight to some, maybe/hopefully.
     
    #5

Share This Page