Transfer Rumours To sack or not to sack?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should we sack Ange now?

  • Total voters
    31
  • Poll closed .
Dier Hard said:
I don’t actually disagree, I’d rather he goes regardless of Europa but I just think it’s a case of (if he wins) do I see Spurs genuinely sacking the manager that’s done what multiple others haven’t? Especially as he’d also achieve Levy’s wet dream of CL revenue.
Click to expand...

I just think that the league form has been so bad for so long that even a pro Ange person can see Ange isn’t the answer.

Ideally Spurs win it and they do a mutual consent announcement, that way everyone comes out this looking okay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Citizen Kane., remembercolinlee and Dier Hard
KingHotspur said:
I just think that the league form has been so bad for so long that even a pro Ange person can see Ange isn’t the answer.

Ideally Spurs win it and they do a mutual consent announcement, that way everyone comes out this looking okay.
Click to expand...

This would be the ideal scenario.

The thought of Ange trying to juggle the PL and the CL is terrifying.

That plus the quality of teams coming up from the Championship next season would leave us in real danger of relegation if he stays imo.
 
Ange does not enjoy post match interviews. Looks like it wouldn't take much for him to strangle the sky interviewer.
 
remembercolinlee said:
Even we can't be stupid enough to sack another manager a week before
































Can we? <laugh>
Click to expand...

If it's the wrong thing to do...




...yes, we can!

Personally, I have no faith in the guy, whatsoever, but the last 2 away games in Europe have got the job done without too many issues. I don't know if he's responsible for that or it's in spite of his 'coaching', but we're on roll (of sorts)...and you don't **** with a winning streak.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2025-5-11_17-55-32.jpeg
    upload_2025-5-11_17-55-32.jpeg
    8.4 KB · Views: 4
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: The Changing Man
Tilly'sowner said:
The final next week is Ange’s 100th match at spurs and I believe we are due some stats from our esteemed statistician so let’s wait until then!
Click to expand...
It will be his 75th league match. As @The RDBD has pointed out there is nothing particularly special about 100 matches but you do need a lot more than 75 before you can start blaming the coach instead of things like injuries, poor decisions etc.
Personally I think our best 14 players are top 4 standard but most of the rest are no better than mid table. The injuries have meant that we have been fielding a mid-table standard side most weeks or sometimes one with several better players who have just returned from injury. So I still don't think the league position in itself justifies sacking Ange. The lack of strategy on the pitch is much more worrying though, so I now don't think that the chance of Ange making a real difference is very high. The same applies to anyone we might appoint in his place, though so I am neutral now.
 
SpursDisciple said:
Ange does not enjoy post match interviews. Looks like it wouldn't take much for him to strangle the sky interviewer.
Click to expand...

It’s part of the job to explain why you’ve lost and played poorly. The guy is handsomely paid yet acts like he’s above being asked simple questions. I saw it at Celtic which is why I knew he would struggle with that part of the job at Spurs as Spurs always lose more games than Celtic.

He’s just up to standard in most parts of the job unfortunately. Appointing him was and has proved to be a massive mistake.
 
PowerSpurs said:
It will be his 75th league match. As @The RDBD has pointed out there is nothing particularly special about 100 matches but you do need a lot more than 75 before you can start blaming the coach instead of things like injuries, poor decisions etc.
Personally I think our best 14 players are top 4 standard but most of the rest are no better than mid table. The injuries have meant that we have been fielding a mid-table standard side most weeks or sometimes one with several better players who have just returned from injury. So I still don't think the league position in itself justifies sacking Ange. The lack of strategy on the pitch is much more worrying though, so I now don't think that the chance of Ange making a real difference is very high. The same applies to anyone we might appoint in his place, though so I am neutral now.
Click to expand...

I’d say 2 full league seasons is enough to judge him.

I agree if he was able to play his first choice team every game then results would be better (same as any team) but the way he asks his players to play will always result in fatigue or injuries (not compatible for any league of a decent standard)
 
You must log in or register to see media

By the 'missing piece' I assume he's referring to relegation?

<laugh>
 
PowerSpurs said:
It will be his 75th league match. As @The RDBD has pointed out there is nothing particularly special about 100 matches but you do need a lot more than 75 before you can start blaming the coach instead of things like injuries, poor decisions etc.
Personally I think our best 14 players are top 4 standard but most of the rest are no better than mid table. The injuries have meant that we have been fielding a mid-table standard side most weeks or sometimes one with several better players who have just returned from injury. So I still don't think the league position in itself justifies sacking Ange. The lack of strategy on the pitch is much more worrying though, so I now don't think that the chance of Ange making a real difference is very high. The same applies to anyone we might appoint in his place, though so I am neutral now.
Click to expand...

<yikes>

Sorry but this is a wild overestimation.

I can't see the current top 4 being interested in more than:
Romero
Porro
Bergvall
Kulusevski
Udogie

I'm really struggling to get anywhere near 14 players.
 
Citizen Kane. said:
<yikes>

Sorry but this is a wild overestimation.

I can't see the current top 4 being interested in more than:
Romero
Porro
Bergvall
Kulusevski
Udogie

I'm really struggling to get anywhere near 14 players.
Click to expand...
That's three of a very leaky back four and the other's van de Ven.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back