Anything is possibe in football, if you watched Laudrups press conference yesterday he mentions the "human" factor of danny wanting to be back home, he also said that theoretically Danny might have only played 7/8 games till the end of the season then come back in the summer to find he was maybe number 3 choice and would then have to find a move away. For the sake if 8 games Laudrup thinks they got it covered, i tend to agree with him .Danny hasnt really played for us apart from the first few games of the season so the situation isnt as bad a s some may think, we have also scored more goals this season they we did last year without danny featuring so i can see Laudrups take on it. Laudrup said there were deals for a couple of players that didnt happen,his words were to the chairman"if you can get them great,if not then thats great to, i can manage with what i have" Laudrup mentioned there was a deal that he made which was quite advanced then at the last minute the president changed the rules !! instead of a loan he wanted the swans to sign him permenent !! so laudrup just said no ! Overall the club was happy for Danny to go,they hd a couple of things to work on if he went but wernt gonna get ripped off as they wernt overly desperate to get somebody for the sake of it. Good astute buisness by the club IMO, Danny had some issues and in 6 months we would be lucky to get the same money for him,we have saved 6 months of hefty wages now.
Anything is possibe in football, if you watched Laudrups press conference yesterday he mentions the "human" factor of danny wanting to be back home, he also said that theoretically Danny might have only played 7/8 games till the end of the season then come back in the summer to find he was maybe number 3 choice and would then have to find a move away. For the sake if 8 games Laudrup thinks they got it covered, i tend to agree with him .Danny hasnt really played for us apart from the first few games of the season so the situation isnt as bad a s some may think, we have also scored more goals this season they we did last year without danny featuring so i can see Laudrups take on it. Laudrup said there were deals for a couple of players that didnt happen,his words were to the chairman"if you can get them great,if not then thats great to, i can manage with what i have" Laudrup mentioned there was a deal that he made which was quite advanced then at the last minute the president changed the rules !! instead of a loan he wanted the swans to sign him permenent !! so laudrup just said no ! Overall the club was happy for Danny to go,they hd a couple of things to work on if he went but wernt gonna get ripped off as they wernt overly desperate to get somebody for the sake of it. Good astute buisness by the club IMO, Danny had some issues and in 6 months we would be lucky to get the same money for him,we have saved 6 months of hefty wages now.
Well he is on the bench today, wonder if its more comfortable than our bench ? Seriously though hope he gets on with things there though, think he needs to sort his head out, maybe it will work for him.
What a fantastic reception Danny got when he came on as sub from the sunderland fans, Danny got straight to business and was a threat from the time he got on the pitch....well done Danny boy. It was the opposite for us with no threat at all to speak of...I would not say laudrup has got it covered at all i would say he has made one big cock up ...
Hoo f*****g hah. Last season all you did was slate off Graham. What was his final contribution for the Swans - missing an open goal. We did not lose to W Ham because we sold Danny Graham.
Remember he has selective memory PGF and am I rightin thinking they lost as well and Dennis didn't score !
hey dip stick he was useless under Brendan and i have said more than once that he has improved under laudrup keep up son will you we lost at west ham because we have no striker. we gave our own striker of any worth away without any replacement because we were too late and missed the boat...
But we played our best football of the season, against WBA, without DG. You just want to slate off ML. It wouldn't surprise me if you wanted us to lose today just so you could have a moan. Accept we were beaten on the day by the better team.
At last, Dai's medication has run out. Welcome back to the Dai we all love. You cannot blame ML for DG off the field shenanigans and personal problems of someone who was never a striker according to you.You can blame ML for making a call on a players professionalism compared to the continental attitude of being a footballer. DG will become like the Andy Robinson of this new gen
At last, Dai's medication has run out. Welcome back to the Dai we all love. You cannot blame ML for DG off the field shenanigans and personal problems of someone who was never a striker according to you.You can blame ML for making a call on a players professionalism compared to the continental attitude of being a footballer. DG will become like the Andy Robinson of this new gen
Dai the club really didn't have much choice with Danny boy, his off field behaviour was not acceptable, we move on, and I'm sure we'll get something in the loan market, if Laudrup feels we need it, I told you all months ago you will not see much of Danny boy this season!........... Have I told you the latest on Leon??? Now there's a story!..............
Guys can we sort out all these stupid double posts please!!....................... When you see this girls!! "The following errors occurred with your submission, This forum requires that you wait 30 seconds between posts." It means you have posted, Got it!, so don't wait 30 seconds and hit the PQR button again for crying out loud......................
