True. But two women would still be holding on to it...
Nothing wrong with not letting go
True. But two women would still be holding on to it...
Still upset you missed a row?Nothing wrong with not letting go![]()
Still upset you missed a row?![]()
And repeating it in different ways.True. But two women would still be holding on to it...
The Liverpool one? That was ridiculous!Another clear penalty missed yesterday, looks like we'll be keeping up that one per week average.
The Liverpool one? That was ridiculous!
Good average honestly considering there's 10 games a week.I don't know how many correct overturns since they don't cause controversy but the 3 match changing decisions in our games alone almost make up for that. working well so far this season. Hasn't unnecessarily slowed down the games i've watched either.Another clear penalty missed yesterday, looks like we'll be keeping up that one per week average.
Good average honestly considering there's 10 games a week.I don't know how many correct overturns since they don't cause controversy but the 3 match changing decisions in our games alone almost make up for that. working well so far this season. Hasn't unnecessarily slowed down the games i've watched either.
VAR is being used for 2 completely different categories of decisions. If was limited to objective rulings like offsides then there shouldn’t be an issue with it. Trouble is, when ruling on penalties, red cards, and so on, you are ultimately exchanging one flawed human’s view for another’s, so what’s the point?
I mean it clearly is. some serious selective memory going on there.I'd suggest it's not too different to what we had before though if we're still getting a howler a week. Hardly worth all the hassle if they're just going to back their ref mates up.
I wonder how many more consecutive penalties United will get.
I mean it clearly is. some serious selective memory going on there.
I'll ignore how there were clearly more than 1 howler a week last season.
Firstly those howlers would have been howlers without VAR. So no change there.
Secondly, even if you put your Cherrypicked bad decisions from all 50 games against the correct VAR overturns from our 5 alone thats -3 incorrect decisions. from 8. I'm sure there were many more correct decisions from the other 45 games.
Thirdly, if the overturned goals in our games were allowed to stand and the opposition then defended and prevented us from scoring we would be on 1 point so far this season and bottom rather than top half. hard to say it hasn't had an impact there
I just think there is a serious case of those against VAR selectively choosing the worst cases of innaction and ignoring all the correct ones because they aren't controversial and don't get the media coverage.
VAR is being used for 2 completely different categories of decisions. If was limited to objective rulings like offsides then there shouldn’t be an issue with it. Trouble is, when ruling on penalties, red cards, and so on, you are ultimately exchanging one flawed human’s view for another’s, so what’s the point?
I mean it clearly is. some serious selective memory going on there.
I'll ignore how there were clearly more than 1 howler a week last season.
Firstly those howlers would have been howlers without VAR. So no change there.
Secondly, even if you put your cherrypicked bad decisions from all 50 games against the correct VAR overturns from our 5 alone thats -3 incorrect decisions from 8. I'm sure there were many more correct decisions from the other 45 games.
Thirdly, if the overturned goals in our games were allowed to stand and the opposition then defended and prevented us from scoring we would be on 1 point so far this season and bottom rather than top half. hard to say it hasn't had an impact there
I just think there is a serious case of those against VAR selectively choosing the worst cases of innaction and ignoring all the correct ones because they aren't controversial and don't get the media coverage.