1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

The science behind RHCs liver thread

Discussion in 'Liverpool' started by Prince Knut, Apr 30, 2016.

  1. Red Hadron Collider

    Red Hadron Collider The Hammerhead

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2011
    Messages:
    57,485
    Likes Received:
    9,843
    Here’s when the universe’s first stars may have been born
    Radio observations put the ‘cosmic dawn’ 180 million years after the Big Bang
    BY
    EMILY CONOVER
    1:00PM, FEBRUARY 28, 2018
    please log in to view this image

    TOTALLY LIT The first stars in the universe switched on by 180 million years after the Big Bang, radio observations indicate. Ultraviolet light from early, blueish stars (illustrated) interacted with hydrogen gas, causing it to absorb background radiation, and creating a signature scientists have now detected.

    For the first time, scientists may have detected hints of the universe’s primordial sunrise, when the first twinkles of starlight appeared in the cosmos.

    Stars began illuminating the heavens by about 180 million years after the universe was born, researchers report in the March 1 Nature. This “cosmic dawn” left its mark on the hydrogen gasthat surrounded the stars (SN: 6/8/02, p. 362). Now, a radio antenna has reportedly picked up that resulting signature.

    “It’s a tremendously exciting result. It’s the first time we’ve possibly had a glimpse of this era of cosmic history,” says observational cosmologist H. Cynthia Chiang of the University of KwaZulu-Natal in Durban, South Africa, who was not involved in the research.

    The oldest galaxies seen directly with telescopes sent their starlight from significantly later: several hundreds of millions of years after the Big Bang, which occurred about 13.8 billion years ago. The new observation used a technique, over a decade in the making, that relies on probing the hydrogen gas that filled the early universe. That approach holds promise for the future of cosmology: More advanced measurements may eventually reveal details of the early universe throughout its most difficult-to-observe eras.

    But experts say the result needs additional confirmation, in particular because the signature doesn’t fully agree with theoretical predictions. The signal — a dip in the intensity of radio waves across certain frequencies — was more than twice as strong as expected.

    The unexpectedly large observed signal suggests that the hydrogen gas was colder than predicted. If confirmed, this observation might hint at a new phenomenon taking place in the early universe. One possibility, suggested in a companion paper in Nature by theoretical astrophysicist Rennan Barkana of Tel Aviv University, is that the hydrogen was cooled due to new types of interactions between the hydrogen and particles of dark matter, a mysterious substance that makes up most of the matter in the universe.

    If the interpretation is correct, “it’s quite possible that this is worth two Nobel Prizes,” says theoretical astrophysicist Avi Loeb of Harvard University, who was not involved with the work. One prize could be given for detecting the signature of the cosmic dawn, and another for the dark matter implications. But Loeb expresses reservations about the result: “What makes me a bit nervous is the fact that the [signal] that they see doesn't look like what we expected.”

    To increase scientists’ confidence, the result must be verified by other experiments and additional tests, says theoretical cosmologist Matias Zaldarriaga of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J. Several other efforts to detect the signal are already under way.

    Experimental cosmologist Judd Bowman of Arizona State University in Tempe and colleagues teased out their evidence for the first stars from the impact the light had on hydrogen gas. “We don’t see the starlight itself. We see indirectly the effect that the starlight would have had” on the cosmic environment, says Bowman, a collaborator on the Experiment to Detect the Global Epoch of Reionization Signature, EDGES, which detected the stars’ traces.



    please log in to view this image

    TURN THE TABLES Detecting the signature of the first stars required a radio antenna about the size of a table (shown), located in western Australia, far from artificial sources of radio waves.
    BRETT HISCOCK AND LOU PULS/CSIRO AUSTRALIA
    Collapsing out of dense pockets of hydrogen gas early in the universe’s history, the first stars flickered on, emitting ultraviolet light that interacted with the surrounding hydrogen. The starlight altered the proportion of hydrogen atoms found in different energy levels. That change caused the gas to absorb light of a particular wavelength, about 21 centimeters, from the cosmic microwave background — the glow left over from around 380,000 years after the Big Bang (SN: 3/21/15, p. 7). A distinctive dip in the intensity of the light at that wavelength appeared as a result.

    Over time, that light’s wavelength was stretched to several meters by the expansion of the universe, before being detected on Earth as radio waves. Observing the amount of stretching that had taken place in the light allowed the researchers to pinpoint how long after the Big Bang the light was absorbed, revealing when the first stars turned on.

    Still, detecting the faint dip was a challenge: Other cosmic sources, such as the Milky Way, emit radio waves at much higher levels, which must be accounted for. And to avoid interference from sources on Earth — like FM radio stations — Bowman and colleagues set up their table-sized antenna far from civilization, at the Murchison Radio-astronomy Observatory in the western Australian outback.

    Scientists hope to use similar techniques with future, more advanced instruments to map out where in the sky stars first started forming, and to reveal other periods early in the universe’s history. “This is really the first step in what’s going to become a new and exciting field,” Bowman says.
     
    #541
  2. Angry_Physics

    Angry_Physics Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2018
    Messages:
    3,070
    Likes Received:
    1,318
    Latest and best photo of Pluto.
    please log in to view this image
     
    #542
  3. The RDBD

    The RDBD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    27,511
    Likes Received:
    13,174
    Can see the eye of Cthulhu in the bottom left.
     
    #543
    Angry_Physics likes this.
  4. Angry_Physics

    Angry_Physics Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2018
    Messages:
    3,070
    Likes Received:
    1,318
    ^^Proper nerd this lad <laugh>
     
    #544
  5. moreinjuredthanowen

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    116,286
    Likes Received:
    27,707
    that is a beauty. ive not seen one of pluto like this before.
     
    #545
  6. FedLadSonOfAnfield

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2013
    Messages:
    20,481
    Likes Received:
    4,935
    this one's pretty clear <ok>

    pluto-gallery-03.jpg
     
    #546
  7. moreinjuredthanowen

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    116,286
    Likes Received:
    27,707
    #547
  8. Angry_Physics

    Angry_Physics Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2018
    Messages:
    3,070
    Likes Received:
    1,318
    #548
  9. Angry_Physics

    Angry_Physics Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2018
    Messages:
    3,070
    Likes Received:
    1,318
    please log in to view this image


    Increase of natural and human emitted CO2 is 0.01125% added to the atmosphere since 1750, and humans didn't start really putting it out until 1940 and thereafter.
    so about 0.002% maybe is what we added since then to the total atmosphere, as human emissions are only about 3 to 5% of total CO2 yearly emission on the planet with oceans and soil being the major ones adding C14.

    Believing this is causing all sorts of doom and "tipping points" and floods storms and drought, is more or less the same as believing in magic
     
    #549
  10. The RDBD

    The RDBD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    27,511
    Likes Received:
    13,174
    I know a planet-sized monument to the
    Great One when I see it (and will thus
    avoiding being torn to shreds - for a while -
    by his earthly holocaust :) ) .
     
    #550
    Angry_Physics likes this.

  11. Red Hadron Collider

    Red Hadron Collider The Hammerhead

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2011
    Messages:
    57,485
    Likes Received:
    9,843
    Wha? <yikes>
     
    #551
  12. Angry_Physics

    Angry_Physics Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2018
    Messages:
    3,070
    Likes Received:
    1,318
    wtf, you're not a nerd!? Now I've seen it all <laugh>
     
    #552
  13. Red Hadron Collider

    Red Hadron Collider The Hammerhead

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2011
    Messages:
    57,485
    Likes Received:
    9,843
    What's it about?
     
    #553
  14. Red Hadron Collider

    Red Hadron Collider The Hammerhead

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2011
    Messages:
    57,485
    Likes Received:
    9,843
    Knotted structures called skyrmions seem to mimic ball lightning
    A new type of skyrmion simulates linked magnetic fields that may hold glowing orbs together, too
    BY
    EMILY CONOVER
    2:00PM, MARCH 2, 2018
    please log in to view this image

    GREAT BALL OF FIRE Scientists created a knotted structure called a skyrmion (illustrated) that mimics the magnetic fields described in a proposed theory of ball lightning, electrical orbs sometimes observed during thunderstorms.

    SPONSOR MESSAGE
    The physics behind a weird electrical phenomenon — glowing orbs of lightning — may be mimicked by something even stranger. A magnetic structure proposed for the natural oddity known as ball lightning makes an appearance in a newfound variety of a knotlike entity called a skyrmion, a team of scientists reports.

    Typically observed during thunderstorms, ball lightning is poorly understood. Anecdotal reports describe eerily glowing spheres that float through the air for several seconds before fading (SN: 2/9/02, p. 87). That’s much longer than standard lightning strikes, which last tens of microseconds, and researchers are still struggling to explain how the fireballs persist.

    One theory, proposed in the 1990s, suggests that ball lightning is a plasma held together by magnetic fields arranged in rings that link together into a knot. “Because it’s linked up in this tight way, it can’t really fall apart,” says physicist David Hall of Amherst College in Massachusetts. “That could provide a reason why ball lightning survives as long as it does.”



    please log in to view this image

    LINKED UP Simulated magnetic fields produced by a 3-D skyrmion are arranged into linked rings (illustrated). The arrangement matches that of the magnetic fields proposed to explain ball lightning.
    D. HALL
    Now, Hall and colleagues have created an analog of such linked magnetic fields in a seemingly unrelated type of knotted structure, a skyrmion. Found in a variety of substances — from thin films of magnetic materials to liquid crystals — skyrmions are a kind of disturbance within matter (SN: 2/17/18, p. 18). The objects can move like independent particles, shifting from place to place within a material while maintaining their knotted configuration (SN: 10/18/14, p. 22). And like a tight knot in a thread, skyrmions are difficult to undo, making them relatively stable structures.
    Hall and colleagues created their skyrmion in a state of matter called a Bose-Einstein condensate, composed of atoms cooled to a temperature so low that they all take on the same quantum state and begin acting as if they are one unified entity (SN: 10/13/01, p. 230). The atoms that make up the Bose-Einstein condensate each have a quantum property called spin, which makes them behave like tiny magnets.

    When the scientists switched on a specially designed magnetic field, the spins arranged into a twisting structure of loops, knotting up into a configuration known as a Shankar skyrmion. That arrangement was predicted theoretically about 40 years ago, but not seen in the real world until now. While skyrmions found in thin magnetic materials are two-dimensional whirls, the new skyrmion is a 3-D beast, the researchers report March 2 in Science Advances.

    Within the condensate, the spins produced something analogous to a magnetic field: The condensate behaved as if it were a charged particle being pushed around by a magnetic field when in reality no such magnetic field existed. Like the skyrmion itself, the scientists realized, the imitation magnetic field was knotted, and it matched the interlinked rings of magnetic fields proposed for ball lightning.

    Eventually, studying 3-D knotted magnetic fields like those potentially present in ball lightning might help scientists devise better ways to control plasmas within future fusion reactors for generating power, the researchers suggest.

    The creation of knotted structures in Bose-Einstein condensates is in its infancy, and such efforts are “very welcomed” says physicist Egor Babaev of KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, who was not involved with the research. “People are just starting to scratch the surface of these objects.”
     
    #554
  15. Angry_Physics

    Angry_Physics Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2018
    Messages:
    3,070
    Likes Received:
    1,318
    Your Dad, note the eye and the Pluto pic (non Disney one) "planet-sized monument"
    please log in to view this image
     
    #555
  16. Red Hadron Collider

    Red Hadron Collider The Hammerhead

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2011
    Messages:
    57,485
    Likes Received:
    9,843
    Google moves toward quantum supremacy with 72-qubit computer
    IBM and Intel recently debuted similarly sized chips
    BY
    EMILY CONOVER
    5:17PM, MARCH 5, 2018
    please log in to view this image

    QUANTUM UPGRADE Google’s 72-qubit quantum chip (shown) could become the first to perform a calculation impossible for traditional computers.

    ERIK LUCERO

    LOS ANGELES — Quantum computers are bulking up.

    Researchers from Google are testing a quantum computer with 72 quantum bits, or qubits, scientists reported March 5 at a meeting of the American Physical Society — a big step up from the company’s previous nine-qubit chip.

    The team hopes to use the larger quantum chip to demonstrate quantum supremacy for the first time, performing a calculation that is impossible with traditional computers (SN: 7/8/17, p. 28), Google physicist Julian Kelly reported.

    Achieving quantum supremacy requires a computer of more than 50 qubits, but scientists are still struggling to control so many finicky quantum entities at once. Unlike standard bits that take on a value of 0 or 1, a qubit can be 0, 1 or a mashup of the two, thanks to a quantum quirk known as superposition.

    Nicknamed Bristlecone because its qubits are arranged in a pattern resembling a pinecone’s scales, the computer is now being put through its paces. “We’re just starting testing,” says physicist John Martinis of Google and the University of California, Santa Barbara. “From what we know so far, we’re very optimistic.” The quantum supremacy demonstration could come within a few months if everything works well, Martinis says.

    Google is one of several companies working to make quantum computers a reality. IBM announced it was testing a 50-qubit quantum computer in November 2017 (SN Online: 11/10/17), and Intel announced a 49-qubit test chip in January.
     
    #556
  17. Angry_Physics

    Angry_Physics Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2018
    Messages:
    3,070
    Likes Received:
    1,318
    Interesting but Quantum it is absolutely not. Seeing as quantum computing utterly failed to actually deliver quantum computing, they just kept the name, for what is not even remotely quantum computing.

    There is no such thing as a " Quantum computer" <laugh>
    If there was, you'd never need to "beef it up"
     
    #557
  18. The RDBD

    The RDBD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    27,511
    Likes Received:
    13,174
    No decidable calculation is impossible for a computer.
    The issue is how long does the calculation take, and
    how much compute resource is required to achieve it.

    So what is the "impossible" calculation then ??
     
    #558
  19. moreinjuredthanowen

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    116,286
    Likes Received:
    27,707
    divide by zero?
     
    #559
  20. Angry_Physics

    Angry_Physics Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2018
    Messages:
    3,070
    Likes Received:
    1,318
    one that is beyond our ability to calculate and validate.
    How long is an irrelevant caveat, if it takes 1000 years we have to wait 1000 years to see if the calculation is even right and something didn't go wrong on year 400 due to a glitch or fault in the hardware:D
     
    #560

Share This Page