The RS !

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Seems to be going over some peoples heads. Even super abu sourness had to lump praise on our performance. I bet that tore him apart inside.

I am surprised how anyone missed the point tbh. There is no doubt United fans have every right to be confident based on our recent performances.
 
Watched all the game,if you think you were the better side on the balance of play then that's fine <whistle>

The performance backed up with the stats and the fact chelsea had just 20 minutes on top all game (just after half time) will do for me.

Its what you call 'conclusive'
 
Ironically your post confirms what all of us have just posted.

#notjustabouttheresult

Lets be honest if Chelsea hadn't started playing anti-football they would have smashed you in the 2nd half. Until the changes they had you well and truly on the ropes - you could hardly touch the ball. Mourinho was a muppet and he's done it twice now, and ****ed up both times. 25 minutes to go and he parks a big **** off blue bus <doh>

So rather than you earning a draw it was more like Chelsea throwing away a win <ok>

But I do admire everyone's delusion/optimism!
 
I am surprised how anyone missed the point tbh. There is no doubt United fans have every right to be confident based on our recent performances.

You can see the players getting comfortable and tye fact players we are seeing only now fit in right away. Whatever his instructions on the training pitch are, it's working.

When those goals come, and they will come in buckets, i can see us hammering sides. Until then, some brilliant football can be enjoyed. Hopefully the results too.
 
Lets be honest if Chelsea hadn't started playing anti-football they would have smashed you in the 2nd half. Until the changes they had you well and truly on the ropes - you could hardly touch the ball. Mourinho was a muppet and he's done it twice now, and ****ed up both times. 25 minutes to go and he parks a big **** off blue bus <doh>

So rather than you earning a draw it was more like Chelsea throwing away a win <ok>

But I do admire everyone's delusion/optimism!

Not at all mate. We created plenty and were hardly troubled at all from them in open play. They scored from a set piece, as did we. But from open play we created so much more. Out of the two defences, considering the shambles we've been at the back earlier in the season, we held our own against arguably the best attack in the league. On top of that players such as Shaw and Januzaj have had their best performances in their last two games.

In terms of talking about performance, there's a bit more depth to it than the simple "ah they would have smashed you had Jose not parked the bus" something that you can't prove based on what actually happened up to that point.
 
We quite obviously were on the balance of play. Had you watched the game you would know <ok>

Really you weren't mate. First half was even but the second half Chelsea dominated and deservedly took the lead. Fair play for sticking at it and grabbing a leveller at the death, but you were hardly peppering their goal in the last 15.

That said, it was the best performance I've seen from United this season so I can understand the reason you all fell positive about it
 
I obviously disagree as first half we were well on top. Unlucky not to be a goal up. Second half chelsea had a really strong 20 minute spell. Looked good and deserved the goal. We didnt create much but we started to turn the screw the last ten minutes. I felt we just needed one clear chance and we would score. We did.

Im not saying we were miles better. Just edged it overall. Deserved at least a point.
 
I wouldn't argue that you weren't worth a point, but I didn't see you as the better side. Don't forget they were missing the lethal Costa btw, who destroyed us at Goodison, different class him at present, love him.
 
I wouldn't argue that you weren't worth a point, but I didn't see you as the better side. Don't forget they were missing the lethal Costa btw, who destroyed us at Goodison, different class him at present, love him.

True enough but we were missing rooney and falcao. Also herrera so i think they more than cancel out costa not playing.
 
I wouldn't argue that you weren't worth a point, but I didn't see you as the better side. Don't forget they were missing the lethal Costa btw, who destroyed us at Goodison, different class him at present, love him.

You like the older men Tobes? <diva>
 
I wouldn't argue that you weren't worth a point, but I didn't see you as the better side. Don't forget they were missing the lethal Costa btw, who destroyed us at Goodison, different class him at present, love him.

Far too sensible, just put it simply, was our performance good enough to get us top 4 instead of Liverpool? <ok>
 
I wouldn't argue that you weren't worth a point, but I didn't see you as the better side. Don't forget they were missing the lethal Costa btw, who destroyed us at Goodison, different class him at present, love him.

Sunday night someone on the Chelsea board stated we would have had no chance if Costa played, i asked what difference he would have made since they created nothing. I am still waiting for a reply, perhaps you can tell me what he would have done with no service from midfield?
 
True enough but we were missing rooney and falcao. Also herrera so i think they more than cancel out costa not playing.

Who do you see playing against City, Herrera or Fellaini? Herrera has been my star man all season but Fellaini has been a real pest in the last two games (not to mention a goal threat). I think against powerful midfields LVG will go with Fellaini for a while or drop a winger (Adnan) and play both.
 
Sunday night someone on the Chelsea board stated we would have had no chance if Costa played, i asked what difference he would have made since they created nothing. I am still waiting for a reply, perhaps you can tell me what he would have done with no service from midfield?

That comment about Costa can only have come from someone who has absolutely no clue about what they're watching. Chelsea created very little, we had far more chances. If anything we missed Rooney/Falcao more than they missed Costa as grandad should have put away more chances!
 
Who do you see playing against City, Herrera or Fellaini? Herrera has been my star man all season but Fellaini has been a real pest in the last two games (not to mention a goal threat). I think against powerful midfields LVG will go with Fellaini for a while or drop a winger (Adnan) and play both.

Drop januzaj and play both. Go with a diamond.
 
Sunday night someone on the Chelsea board stated we would have had no chance if Costa played, i asked what difference he would have made since they created nothing. I am still waiting for a reply, perhaps you can tell me what he would have done with no service from midfield?

Costa's presence would have given the midfield - notably Fabregas a different kind of target, he's all about movement and getting in behind, as opposed to the more static Drogba. He plays off the shoulder and has already formed a lethal combination with Fabregas. So their play would have differed is the answer.