We could still keep all the pageantry without the royals, other countries manage it just fine. Billions of tourists still
I love all the cannons going off n gun salute shizzle if you can’t see how Gangster that actually is then you’re not very street tbh pisses all over jobless arseholes making drill videos with props and hired cars
All the flagshaggers here must condone rapey royal ****s shagging kids then. Saffs used to that at his club but the rest of you should be ashamed tbh
How much would someone be willing to pay to witness the execution of a royal live? You could probably sell those seats for millions.
It's inevitable the monarchy will end one day. What percent under 50 actually are in favour of the monarchy? Pretty low if I recall. Things will change and who better to mess it up than Charles?
Imagine if they couldn't vote. They'd be stuck with him forever. I'm mean, Britain is stuck with a racist King now and his sweaty ***** brother.
But they wouldn't as proven by Edward, a King can't just do as they please. He was all but forced to abdicate the Throne. 90% of this board bitch, whine and complain about the currently democratically elected government whenever the topic is raised. But your sat there in the US telling us that if we could vote for a President it would be honky dory because everytime we figure out they're actually a ****, we can have an argument and a election about it. I raise you the same point I raised Pinkie. Can you give me a single valid point as to why that's necessary and anyone can be arsed with such a debate?
Bit dangerous. If zombie apocalypse happens now, I bet dead royals would have super powers. Cut off prince Philip's head and two grow back.
We also shouldn't forget that the American Medical Insurance System has probably rinsed him of all his money. So my guess is yet another bitter ex pat... please log in to view this image
Depends on the method. Guillotine would get the audiences. Live stream on YouTube, the potential is endless. Hung drawn and quartered not so much.
£100 million a year is one thing. The fact of a royal family being morally reprehensible is another. Third, I don't think someone is superior because of whose vagina they tickled on their way out- I don't believe in bowing like some sycophant coward to someone because of who they were born to. I believe people have the right to choose who leads them. You don't like them you kick them out. You're not stuck with Tampax Charlie as king. Not one person in countries without monarchs ever say "I wish we had a king". Majority of people under 50 are against the royal family. Says it all.
Lol, the President of Italy, an example of a country that became a modern Republic in the Queens lifetime costs more than the British royal family. They also dabble in politics, often. But I don't think for a single second the Royals or the system in Britain genuinely believes that the Royals could withstand a genuine democratic push to remove the monarchy, the issue you guys face is this: You bitch cry and moan about democracy and when people respond with "well, tbh, I don't really care. Keep it as it is." Which is a democratic option, you ignore the majority opinion and pretend that in fact, we're being FORCED to think that way by a dictatorial system. It's not the case, they're genuinely just popular in most parts of the country; when they become unpopular the members of family who cause that are, like in any political system, tossed aside. Kings have been forced out, family members sent to the US or Canada, Paris, or allowed to live out there days on an allowance or living off money they can generate. If people wanted them out, they'd be gone.
Bread and jams obviously cheaper than flowers during a cost of living crisis you out of touch posh succubus.
I don’t know a single republican who thinks abolishing the monarchy would solve all of the problems in the UK. It’s just the sensible thing to do.
