That's clear Col. Re Scotland, there is the reverse argument, why should a government in Westminster which has virtually no presence in Scotland have a say over Scottish affairs? But it's a circular argument and we've covered it on here before. I think Scotland will go in the next five years - but only if the economy remains on the up. If things are getting rocky again the safety in numbers, blame the other lot mentality will kick back in. Whatever, good luck to them.
Only an idiot would argue that the EU is a flawless organisation, so here goes........no, I'm not that daft. But for once I take a very pragmatic view on this one, reform if possible, but stay in for purely economic reasons. It will become untenable at some stage, this half in, half out attitude. But your point of principle is unarguable (unless of course we really give up sovereignty to an elected European government.......nah).
Under Blair's government, the Scots were hugely represented in Westminster