The Premier League Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I wouldn't be surprised if this is a precursor to next season. Obviously we don't know how the summer transfer will go for Sunderland, but I wouldn't be shocked if they find season two far far harder than season one.
 
Saintmagic said:
Villa are bigger than Spurs I think, so them. Depending on opinion you could maybe say Leeds and Newcastle as well but I’m not sure about that
Click to expand...
None of those in terms of how Spurs are grouped in with the commercial side, stadium side and “big six” when it comes to TV negotiations

Leeds back in the day were probably closest but it was different then
 
Gregm1988 said:
None of those in terms of how Spurs are grouped in with the commercial side, stadium side and “big six” when it comes to TV negotiations

Leeds back in the day were probably closest but it was different then
Click to expand...

All depends how you define a big club I suppose, but yeah definitely an argument that Spurs would be the biggest if they do go down
 
Yep, that makes sense Burnley. Keep in charge, for 34 PL games, the guy with a proven track record of being incapable of keeping sides in the PL. And then, four games before you officially become a Championship team, let that same guy depart who has a proven track record of getting sides promoted from the Championship.

Either sack him months ago, or keep him.

Stupid club.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OddRiverOakWizards, thereisonlyoneno7 and Libby
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back