The Premier League Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
What was that talk the other day about Chelsea challenging next season? (Until their horrific defence was quite rightly pointed out...)
 
  • Like
Reactions: tomw24
Alonso, Zouma, James, Rudiger, Christensen, Kepa, Tamori. None of them are good enough to challenge for the title.

Only Azp is good enough. And even then, Frank wastes him at LB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tomw24
Alonso, Zouma, James, Rudiger, Christensen, Kepa, Tamori. None of them are good enough to challenge for the title.

Only Azp is good enough. And even then, Frank wastes him at LB.
Also at the other end, neither Giroud or Abraham are good enough. Ok, they're getting Werner, but he's not a CF. They are still way off challenging City and Liverpool.
 
Allow me.
So, Karl plays for a rather large club. They have the right to push the boundaries. If an official is in any sort of doubt, then we let them just give the benefit of doubt, or a penalty (to the big team) regardless. I hope this clears matters up for you.


<laugh>

We’ve seen Man U get a penalty which was so far away from being a penalty it was ridiculous. Then tonight we see something which if it had been at the other end it would have been a stonewall penalty ..... and they say there’s no big team bias? :emoticon-0112-wonde:emoticon-0112-wonde:emoticon-0112-wonde