Anyone taking anything from that exaggerated head bob is an idiot. It's clearly a joke.
There might be something medically wrong with Clinton, but this guy's not in a position to say:
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-has-parkinsons-disease/
He's a bloody anesthesiologist with an axe to grind.
I'm sure he'll be calling for Trump's medical and financial records next, though.
Post that video when he does, ok?
I don't need to. I've already seen loads of similar "analysis" by people with better qualifications.Have you actually watched the video ?
I don't need to. I've already seen loads of similar "analysis" by people with better qualifications.
Breitbart, Fox and the like have been running this stuff for months.
I'm going to assume that you believe that Trump's severely mentally ill, as loads of news outlets claimed that?
I don't need to. I've already seen loads of similar "analysis" by people with better qualifications.
Breitbart, Fox and the like have been running this stuff for months.
I'm going to assume that you believe that Trump's severely mentally ill, as loads of news outlets claimed that?

Trump had a comment about kissing his daughter removed from an interview with Dr Oz.
He said that he kisses Ivanka with every chance that he gets. Thats ok, right?
Why would he want something fairly endearing from reaching the public eye?
Probably because he made previous comments about her hot body and how he'd probably be dating her, if they weren't related.
That and the creepiest photos ever:
You must log in or register to see media
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see media
Is there some context that makes that better? Please?
So it doesn't bother you that he's in Putin's pocket and clearly plans to run the country for his own benefit?Obviously if I said, "tbf she is hot" it would kind of miss the point.
The context I would put it in though, is that I would rather have a person who fancies his daughter running the world, than a person who is responsible for detroying libya and syria, and half a million dead people already.
Personally I don't really care that Clinton lies to the people voting for her about her health. I dont care that she is responsible for preventing the murder of a serving US Ambassador who was in her employment. I don't even care that she and her husband's 'charity fund' is considered to be a fraudulant enterprise 3 times the size of the bernie maddof scandal. Just as I dont care that donald trump fancies his daughter or is rude about mexicans. What I DO care about, is that hillary clinton's foreign policy was responsible for the destruction of two countries, and the growth of terorrism around the world, and that her future foreign policy is based on continuing to support israel and saudi arabia come what may, to push russia into war, and to "obliterate" another country (iran).
Trump is portrayed as the danger to world peace. The reality is that that is clinton. She's already responsible for destroying a decent little chunk of the world, and she's hell bent on a whole lot more of it. Donald Trump's going to perve on his daughter whether he's president or not. The only way Clinton gets to destroy the world I live in is if she gets voted in.

It's intentional. They didn't just miss the whole event by accident.January 2016: Jeremy Corbyn suggests Britain and Argentina get around the table to have sensible negotiations about the Falkland Islands as they could be beneficial to both parties. The media slaughter him, David Cameron says they "gave (the Argentines) the Falklands" during PMQs, and Tory defence minister Michael Fallon calls Corbyn "a bigger threat to the Falklands than Argentina"
September 2016: Theresa May sends Alan Duncan to Argentina to work on sensible negotiations between Britain and Argentina about the Falkland Islands that could be beneficial to both parties. There hasn't been a peep about her giving away the islands or being a bigger threat to them than Argentina.
A round of applause for our point-missing media everyone!
It's a good job you don't care about those five Clinton things as at best one of them is partly true.Obviously if I said, "tbf she is hot" it would kind of miss the point.
The context I would put it in though, is that I would rather have a person who fancies his daughter running the world, than a person who is responsible for destroying libya and syria, and half a million dead people already.
Personally I don't really care that Clinton lies to the people voting for her about her health. I dont care that she is responsible for preventing the murder of a serving US Ambassador who was in her employment, because she didnt answer the phone. I don't care that she was responsibke for top secret emails being hacked because she defied protocol about using an unsecure phone. I don't even care that she and her husband's 'charity fund' is considered to be a fraudulant enterprise 3 times the size of the bernie maddof scandal, or that she would represent a risk of being the first US president to have seizures and collapse live on tv in front of foreign leaders etc. Just as I dont care that donald trump fancies his daughter or is rude about mexicans. What I DO care about, is that hillary clinton's foreign policy was responsible for the destruction of two countries, and the growth of terrorism around the world, and that her future foreign policy is based on continuing to support israel and saudi arabia come what may, to push russia into war, and to "obliterate" another country (iran).
Trump is portrayed as the danger to world peace. The reality is that that is clinton. She's already responsible for destroying a decent little chunk of the world, and she's hell bent on a whole lot more of it. Donald Trump's going to perve on his daughter whether he's president or not. The only way Clinton gets to destroy the world I live in is if she gets voted in.
It's intentional. They didn't just miss the whole event by accident.
The Tories did make it clear that sovereignty wasn't up for debate, though.
I honestly don't get why any negotiations are necessary. It legitimises the Argentinian claims, if anything.
Great Britain's claim to the island predates not only any Argentinian one, but Argentina itself.
If they're protesting about imperialism, then they need to give their country back first and then the locals can open negotiations.
Don't. You'll set Spurf off.Independence for the Falkland Islands
Vive la revolution
His case would be more convincing if he didn't resort to slow motion so often. Who doesn't look a little strange in ultra slow motion replay. I notice he doesn't let the video roll on, as presumably the evidence of the disease is not so strong. His, acknowledged, bias is too obvious. Why not use a Doctor - maybe even a specialist - to give an opinion, rather than just this one man Trump propaganda machine.Hillary's Parkinsons Disease explained here :
You must log in or register to see media
Or I could have just looked at the PNP's link which discredits the video quicker than I can.His case would be more convincing if he didn't resort to slow motion so often. Who doesn't look a little strange in ultra slow motion replay. I notice he doesn't let the video roll on, as presumably the evidence of the disease is not so strong. His, acknowledged, bias is too obvious. Why not use a Doctor - maybe even a specialist - to give an opinion, rather than just this one man Trump propaganda machine.
I can't believe anyone with such a terrible disease would put themselves though a Presidential campaign. Equally, why would the DMC go along with it, and not throw it's weight behind Sanders - who was looking very strong.
None of the evidence of Parkinson's looked very clear to me. I know someone in the advanced stages of this disease and his illness is obvious 5 seconds after seeing him. I didn't see any of the shaking that is part of the condition. I've no idea what cutting edge medication can be used to ameliorate the symptons, but Muhammad Ali was never given anything that could cover the symptoms that Clinton presumably has.
