And that's a valid point to make, I just didn't think Lyme was an especially good example of its impact. Boston is a good one, where migrants have made the town much richer, but also changed its character massively and brought accompanying tension. Probably we are experiencing what the Celts did when the Anglo Saxons turned up.
I have tried reading it, it's more confusing the second and third times. I must have missed your point on where we are allowed to spend money. If you use terms like 'subjugate populations' and 'Fourth Reich' you must expect a reaction. Of course everybody has a right to an opinion, just as everyone has a right to challenge an opinion. My response was probably too much, sorry, but I was responding to what you wrote, not trying to demean you.
You are right, a lot of what I write is questionable, I am constantly amazed that it's not picked up on more often.
Commissioners are non elected, but they are appointed by elected governments. Everything they propose has to be passed by the elected EU Parliament and the EU Council of Ministers, consisting of elected ministers from each national government. It's cumbersome and bureaucratic, and above all it feels distant, but it has plenty of checks and balances. And why does electing people make them qualified or competent? Just look at our own government, which, incidentally, includes 25 ministers who are unelected members of the House of Lords.
If the EU was made more transparently democratic would you be voting Remain?