…and when our brave lads voted in the most left wing government we have ever seen…..Happy VE Day. We can reminisce about the days we were a serious country.
…and when our brave lads voted in the most left wing government we have ever seen…..Happy VE Day. We can reminisce about the days we were a serious country.
You don’t think we are grown up enough to chose a ceremonial head of state based on competence rather than birth?
Nah, just turn the money off. Perhaps you could get your hip fixed with the savings.
Don’t worry, you’ll still be able to doff your cap to your betters for the rest of your days, they ain’t leaving tomorrow.
Some interesting figures in here, by age, region, ethnicity etc.
https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/mcn5c6fr93/BBCPanorama_RoyalFamily_230417_w.pdf
Bottom of page 3. 58% of British are not interested in the Royal family, rising to 70% for the under 50s. It’ll die of apathy.
Yeah, the hip was a cheap shot, though I’m sure if we said the £86 m- £125m direct grant and the rightful tax being paid by the Windsors would all go to healthcare it would make a small difference.Me waiting for a new hip has nothing to do with the royal family and everything to do with inept politicians.
When have I said they're my betters?
No, the questions were about the Royal Family, not the Royal Family in the context of cost of living etc. it’s a long term trend. Have a look at the figures, they back you up to an extent. Most people don’t care, but not to the extent that they want rid of the Royals. Unless they are young.Not really a surprise considering we are in the grip of a crippling cost of living crisis.
Again, the fault of inept governments, not the royal family.
Some interesting figures in here, by age, region, ethnicity etc.
https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/mcn5c6fr93/BBCPanorama_RoyalFamily_230417_w.pdf
Bottom of page 3. 58% of British are not interested in the Royal family, rising to 70% for the under 50s. It’ll die of apathy.
What was the Windsor's original surname before they adopted it. Think it was German, might be wrong mind.
What was the Windsor's original surname before they adopted it. Think it was German, might be wrong mind.
Yeah, the hip was a cheap shot, though I’m sure if we said the £86 m- £125m direct grant and the rightful tax being paid by the Windsors would all go to healthcare it would make a small difference.
No, the questions were about the Royal Family, not the Royal Family in the context of cost of living etc. it’s a long term trend. Have a look at the figures, they back you up to an extent. Most people don’t care, but not to the extent that they want rid of the Royals. Unless they are young.
But the questions were asked during the cost of living crisis.
Yes, a lot of people have no strong feelings either way, but a big majority still want a monarchy.
I don't accept the money saving argument.
All our problems at present are the fault of generations of **** politics.
Not really a surprise considering we are in the grip of a crippling cost of living crisis.
Again, the fault of inept governments, not the royal family.
Bit of a mouthful thatSaxe-Coburg-Gotha, being the surname of Queen Victoria's German husband, Albert. Changed in 1917 by George V during WW1
Bit of a mouthful that
You couldn't quite bring yourself to blame this government, could you?
Still quarter of a billion that could have gone on something useful.
In unrelated news they’re cutting the social care budget by a quarter of a billion.
Who are, the royal family?
That 250 million figure is a figure quoted by one of your civil servants and hasn't been verified.
The real amount is nowhere near that.
The Princes Trust doesn't give a **** about people?
A lifetime of service from Queen Elizabeth 2nd didn't give a ****?
Charles, ahead of his time, campaigning for over 30 years concerned about climate change didn't give a ****?
I await the immature response.