Off Topic The Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should the UK remain a part of the EU or leave?

  • Stay in

    Votes: 56 47.9%
  • Get out

    Votes: 61 52.1%

  • Total voters
    117
  • Poll closed .
haven't watched it but if the title is right, then as dictator like as putin is, Nato is partly to blame. We keep setting up airbases and military installations closer and closer to Russia so of course they want to stop that.

Imagine Russia trying to setup missiles in Canada if Trudeau suddenly got a brain aneurism. You think the U.S. would just roll over and let Canada have their sovereignty. (p.s. we know how this plays out see Cuba)

Canada is a democracy. If Canadians voted in a government that wanted Russian airbases, the US would not declare war on Canada, though sanctions would be massive.

Ukraine is a fledgling democracy. The government there wants to move away from Russia led by an unelected (in fact), authoritarian leader.

The answer may be to delay indefinitely any decision allowing Ukraine into Nato.
 
Canada is a democracy. If Canadians voted in a government that wanted Russian airbases, the US would not declare war on Canada, though sanctions would be massive.

Ukraine is a fledgling democracy. The government there wants to move away from Russia led by an unelected (in fact), authoritarian leader.

The answer may be to delay indefinitely any decision allowing Ukraine into Nato.
Putin won't invade if the west stands strong. We don't need Macron and his capitulation... for political reasons or idiot sympathisers like Jezza and Abbott to make us look weak.
 
mmm... this is his 4th attempt to take over Ukraine. He did the same in Crimea... what was the reason for that?

4th attempt? I think if he wanted to take over ukraine when he took over crimea, we probably would have let him at the time.

Canada is a democracy. If Canadians voted in a government that wanted Russian airbases, the US would not declare war on Canada, though sanctions would be massive.

Ukraine is a fledgling democracy. The government there wants to move away from Russia led by an unelected (in fact), authoritarian leader.

The answer may be to delay indefinitely any decision allowing Ukraine into Nato.

I think that maybe the sensible answer. If that is what would prevent Russia invading then i think that is a win win for everyone. At the moment, no one is going to get involved if Russia do go through with an invade (no Nato troops are moving out there??) and the whole point of joining Nato is so that Ukraine are part of a military alliance for defence? (is that what nato is for?). Surely, it makes sense not to join Nato to stop Russia invading if that is their reason for invading. It is better for Ukraine and better for the common person and the innocents for Ukraine.

in simple terms:

1. Ukraine joins nato -> Russia Invades -> West defends -> head to world war? (least likely)
2. Ukraine joins nato -> Russia doesn't invade and this is all posturing (possibly, but probably not)
3. Ukraine joins nato -> Russia Invades -> West doesn't do anything bar sanctions - very likely
4. Ukraine doesn't join nato -> Putins sticks to his word peace for the time being - 2nd most likely
5. Ukraine doesn't join nato -> putin invades anyway -> west doesn't do anything bar sanctions it's basically a repeat of 3.

4. seems the logical choice to me
 
Putin won't invade if the west stands strong. We don't need Macron and his capitulation... for political reasons or idiot sympathisers like Jezza and Abbott to make us look weak.

When you say stand strong, is the intention to send our air force and troops on the ground in? What does stand strong even mean? just sanctions?
 
4th attempt? I think if he wanted to take over ukraine when he took over crimea, we probably would have let him at the time.



I think that maybe the sensible answer. If that is what would prevent Russia invading then i think that is a win win for everyone. At the moment, no one is going to get involved if Russia do go through with an invade (no Nato troops are moving out there??) and the whole point of joining Nato is so that Ukraine are part of a military alliance for defence? (is that what nato is for?). Surely, it makes sense not to join Nato to stop Russia invading if that is their reason for invading. It is better for Ukraine and better for the common person and the innocents for Ukraine.

in simple terms:

1. Ukraine joins nato -> Russia Invades -> West defends -> head to world war? (least likely)
2. Ukraine joins nato -> Russia doesn't invade and this is all posturing (possibly, but probably not)
3. Ukraine joins nato -> Russia Invades -> West doesn't do anything bar sanctions - very likely
4. Ukraine doesn't join nato -> Putins sticks to his word peace for the time being - 2nd most likely
5. Ukraine doesn't join nato -> putin invades anyway -> west doesn't do anything bar sanctions it's basically a repeat of 3.

4. seems the logical choice to me

4th attempt. I was listening to the Russian analyst on the news. I don't need to go into details about Putin and his regime... we all know what he is like.
But as I said, we don't need idiot sympothisers Like Jezza supporting Putin.
 
Ukraine is not going to join NATO.

....this invasion will either happen or not happen...without Ukraine being in NATO
 
The thing I like the most about this sort of thing is seeing the ‘right on’ people, appointed because their face fits some new ethos, subsequently hoisted by their own petard. Tomorrow’s woke will always find something to hate (and therefore cancel) about today’s woke. It’s now unstoppable.
And what's "right on" people? In fact I hardly understand any of that, must of been away too long.
 
Last edited:
Ukraine is not going to join NATO.

....this invasion will either happen or not happen...without Ukraine being in NATO

64% of Ukrainians now support joining NATO since Crimea was invaded.

Stoltenberg has made it clear that large powerful countries like Russia will not have a veto should the Ukranian government want to join NATO.

That is Russia's red line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Staines R's
Things hotting up in Ukraine. UK have advised all British nationals to leave and advised against all travel from the UK to the area.
My date of 22nd February still looking good, although the US say it could be sooner.
From where I’m sitting, in a position of near total ignorance, the more belligerent noises seem to be coming from the U.K. and US, two governments with leaders in deep domestic ****. Not helped by sending people like Truss into the lions den, so far out of her depth that it would be comical if it wasn’t so dangerous. All these ‘stand firm’ empty threats are being laughed at.

I wouldn’t put anything past Putin, but the NATO side seems incredibly fragmented. Weird scenes inside the goldmine.