Read what I said again mate, I said demographic is changing and will continue to change, Liebour as a political force are dead IMHO.Check the voting demographics.
Read what I said again mate, I said demographic is changing and will continue to change, Liebour as a political force are dead IMHO.Check the voting demographics.
I’m not a fan I just find it a disgrace how she is clearly treated atrociously by the media. Her estimated wealth prior to her relationship was north of 5 mill, I’d say she was doing ok. Just googled her to find her age which is now 38, I think successful actresses, which her wealth proves don’t have issues getting work not that she ever needed to work again.
oh I also noticed you used the word scheming, are you sure you’ve not been influenced by the media?
I have given the Harry & Meghan ‘crisis’ considerable thought over the past week and have come to the conclusion that I couldn’t care less one way or the other.
Hope that helps further the debate.![]()
I take in facts and form opinions. I'm generally not that interested in journalists' opinions, but I get my facts from 24 hour news media as most people do
Dysfunctional on what basis? Split parents, like her now husband, who it’s pretty obvious was fathered by someone else, Harry’s mum had affairs, his uncle, also divorced is involved in some pretty seedy ****, if you’re looking for a dysfunctional family you’d have to go some to beat the Windsor’s.
It shows that it’s all pretty much how you feel no actual evidence to back it up. I do feel sympathy for her as she gets **** from the media unfairly, whilst Kate... as the stories in the link I posted prove.
That’s the point, I’m suggesting the news media have an aggressive bias against her.
Can you show me evidence of this aggressive bias?
Already have through the two sides to a story previously
Apart from the select 20 articles obviously thats not evidence enough. We need to see markle being led in a noose before its real
Already have through the two sides to a story previously
What story?
The ones on a thread I previously posted, like the one (of many) where Kate was praised for tenderly cradling her baby bump, Meghan however is it pride, vanity or acting. Two women who have married into the royal family, pregnant, one is referred to in endearing terms, the other in negative terms. As you've agreed with people's opinions are formed by the access and reports from the media, this is a clear attempt by the media to manipulate people's perceptions. To suggest otherwise is totally disingenuous
Check the voting demographics.
It must be difficult for socialists to cope with, but Labour is now the party of the middle class liberals.
The Tories are fast becoming the party for the working classes.
It must be difficult for socialists to cope with, but Labour is now the party of the middle class liberals.
The Tories are fast becoming the party for the working classes.
Only the hard of thinking working classes.
Just the sort of condescending sneering attitude of the know-it-all Lefties that resulted in your Northern wipe-out, next you'll be saying you don't want that sort voting Labour. Carry on to oblivion...
Exactly.
They just don't get it.
Are you happy if the Markles make zillions in the US selling in the Royal Family brand, Ubes? Would you send mail order for Sussex Royal condoms marketed 'come in a Royal' ?!