Does that mean I am a racist turkey Uber?Yes, if we vote Brexit we’re racist and if we vote Conservative we’re turkeys. There’s a slice of gammon around here too.
Does that mean I am a racist turkey Uber?Yes, if we vote Brexit we’re racist and if we vote Conservative we’re turkeys. There’s a slice of gammon around here too.
Does that mean I am a racist turkey Uber?
Which one plan Stroller, they have changed it every other week.Economists and academics back Labour spending plans - 163 signatories to letter say party ‘deserves to form the next government’.
https://www.ft.com/content/d29b4cbe-0fa4-11ea-a225-db2f231cfeae
Which one plan Stroller, they have changed it every other week.
I think it's now game, set and match TBH.
The plan in the manifesto, detailed and fully costed.
Economists and academics back Labour spending plans - 163 signatories to letter say party ‘deserves to form the next government’.
https://www.ft.com/content/d29b4cbe-0fa4-11ea-a225-db2f231cfeae
Do you mean the one that leaves out the £58 billion for the WASPI women?
Yes. How do the Tory plans stack up?
They're not spending the hundreds of £ billions that Labour plan, burdening future generations with today's debt.
Debt has increased by £643bn in the last 9 years under the Tories. Investment, rather than austerity, might well have seen a fiscal surplus by now. The 163 economists and academics that signed the letter to the FT seem to think that Labour's plans will benefit future generations, and so do the millions of young people that will vote for them.
Huge debt was taken by Labour after 2008 and this has to be serviced. The Tories have cut the deficit by 3/4's which is a start to reducing debt.
Labour would bankrupt the country, despite what 163 Corbyn academics say.
They're economists and academics and they're not Corbynistas - prominent amongst them is Danny Blanchflower, ex of the MPC, and a past critic of Corbyn.
What would really bankrupt the country is the No Deal at the end of 2020, which Johnson has promised the ERG.
Debt has increased by £643bn in the last 9 years under the Tories. Investment, rather than austerity, might well have seen a fiscal surplus by now. The 163 economists and academics that signed the letter to the FT seem to think that Labour's plans will benefit future generations, and so do the millions of young people that will vote for them.
Of course the debt has increased, we were in a massive trade deficit (and still are) due to the financial crisis and previous obligations racked up when we were still under the labour government. At the moment the trade deficit is being reduced and I'm still sort of weary that we are in deficit. We currently pay around 41 billion pounds a year on our interest.
We cant say for sure if austerity was the correct answer but all other Western governments have chosen austerity and labour even campaigned on an austerity programme (maybe not one as intense as the tories).
The Japanese tried the spending on investment in the 90s when they went into recession but wracked up too much debt (or so i read). Its risky as it means even more debt if it isn't successful.
I agree with labour that we need to tackle corporate tax avoidance and high net worth individuals. Tbh even the tax increases are fair and even renationalisation but there seems to be an awful lot of spending in labours books and i do believe corbyn is not afraid of spending away even if the books don't balance