Off Topic The Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should the UK remain a part of the EU or leave?

  • Stay in

    Votes: 56 47.9%
  • Get out

    Votes: 61 52.1%

  • Total voters
    117
  • Poll closed .
I gather you mean old Mad Angry Soupy, the women who was called a Nazi outside the commons, and called the old bill in then it turns out she allegedly organised said stunt herself !!
yes her.... <laugh>
The political reporter on the radio just said 'No deal' has just got nearer. The EU need to sort their lives out because they will fall if we leave on no deal.
 
May was defeated because the motion implied that No Deal would be ruled out and the ERG loonies didn't like it. Not because they think it should be kept as a bargaining chip, but because they actively want No Deal. As do some on here. Traitors.

Who are you calling traitors on this board, Strolls?
 
okay after concideration i will now agree with some on here who described May as 'weak'.
I was wrong.
She is weak for not turning up for that vote result tonight. Jezza was right in mocker her. she should have been there
 
Let’s just remind ourselves of what this girl couldn’t wait to be a part of.Gays thrown off roofs, aid volunteers beheaded,pilots burnt to death, the rape & torture of yazidi girls & the belief that we should all die to usher in a world caliphate.

That’s just what we know about.
 
Who are you calling traitors on this board, Strolls?

There are conscientious MPs who are acting in the best interests of the Nation by seeking to avoid a disastrous No Deal, and they are being described on here as treacherous. I would suggest that the opposite is true and that anyone that actively wants us to leave without a deal, knowingly committing millions to unnecessary hardship, is the real traitor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QPR Oslo
There are conscientious MPs who are acting in the best interests of the Nation by seeking to avoid a disastrous No Deal, and they are being described on here as treacherous. I would suggest that the opposite is true and that anyone that actively wants us to leave without a deal, knowingly committing millions to unnecessary hardship, is the real traitor.

Personally, I don't think the term "traitor" is appropriate for either
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uber_Hoop
Traitor is a tad over the top strolls. As I've said before, the leave voter (for whatever reasons) probably have the most right to be angry (for various reasons).
 
I dont want to leave but what the **** can I do about it. Ellers and co want to leave but again what can they do about it. What we thought was in our control is obviously not.
 
I dont want to leave but what the **** can I do about it. Ellers and co want to leave but again what can they do about it. What we thought was in our control is obviously not.
Don't keep bringing me into it. I voted like 17.4M to leave the EU. for me and leavers, leave meant leave. Sadly May has not negotiated properly and the EU are the EU. What hasn't helped are deceitful MP's that won't accept the result and are trying their best to derail Brexit. This is not in the best interests of the country.
Take mad Anna her constituancy voted to leave, like Ken Clark's and they won't respect the wishes of the people they represent. What is worse is these MP's have undermine May's negotiation hand and still want to take no deal off the table, which if successful, will give the EU the upper hand against our country. So yes, they are being treacherous.
 
Traitor is a tad over the top strolls. As I've said before, the leave voter (for whatever reasons) probably have the most right to be angry (for various reasons).

Wanting to leave is fine, actively wanting to leave without a deal isn't, imho. Traitor isn't a word I would have chosen personally, but it's been used a lot by Brexiteers about anyone that they consider to be standing in their way, so I thought I'd turn it against them.

..........and before I even get to hit post, Ellers does it again!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD and bobmid
There is no free trade deal without a hard border in Ireland. The ERG know that, even if you don't seem to get it. They want to leave without a deal.
I wish you would stop saying no deal as the correct language is WTO. Cliff-edge and catastrophic are just as ill informed. The free trade deal is part of the 'Malthouse compromise" so you backstop worry goes out of the window.
 
Politicians are voted in by their constituency, they dont carry out the wishes of all constituents. That twat who voted down FGM, I dont reckon they were the wishes of his constituents. As for treachery, it's been branded around depending on which angle you see things from. If you were pushed to say who was acting this way then look no further than the ones who implemented it, were voted in to carry it out and have got absolutely ****ing nowhere. If they had their house in order we wouldnt be where we are now, even the most simplistic person can see that. The correct language is a no deal. If you are negotiating a deal and you dont get one then it's a no deal. Doh