Bath and North East Somerset voted 58% to 42% for remain. The constituency MP is Jacob Rees Mogg.Don't keep bringing me into it. I voted like 17.4M to leave the EU. for me and leavers, leave meant leave. Sadly May has not negotiated properly and the EU are the EU. What hasn't helped are deceitful MP's that won't accept the result and are trying their best to derail Brexit. This is not in the best interests of the country.
Take mad Anna her constituancy voted to leave, like Ken Clark's and they won't respect the wishes of the people they represent. What is worse is these MP's have undermine May's negotiation hand and still want to take no deal off the table, which if successful, will give the EU the upper hand against our country. So yes, they are being treacherous.
You can mock it but 17.4M will be angry and will support a Brexit party. However I am still of the opinion that we will leave WTO or a fudge.I dont know why the ERG dont take up with Farage and his new party
What's classed as a fudge?You can mock it but 17.4M will be angry and will support a Brexit party. However I am still of the opinion that we will leave WTO or a fudge.
Bath and North East Somerset voted 58% to 42% for remain. The constituency MP is Jacob Rees Mogg.
Wokingham voted 57% to 43% for remain. The constituency MP is John Redwood.
Who is representing the wishes of these people? 17.4m is a big number. So is 16.1m.
Whatever happens this country will need to do a Spain, have a ‘pacto del olvido’, a pact of forgetting, if we want to avoid the divisions getting deeper and lasting decades.
actually
no wait for that post you deserve a Did you not say mad Anna and Clarke were not representing the people of their constituencies? Correct me if I'm wrong. It's just been pointed out that JRM and Redwood aren't either. Very weak arguement and totally should be dismissed. Please ignore this mistake by ellerseer no, you respect the result of the referendum. Redwood was elected when Blair was PM does that mean we should not respect the result?actually
no wait for that post you deserve a
.
Oh god plaster boy is back.What's classed as a fudge?
. If you can't work it out, i will not explain. It's too simple.Erm is that because you cant explain itOh god plaster boy is back.. If you can't work it out, i will not explain. It's too simple.

Seriously bob are you a bitDid you not say mad Anna and Clarke were not representing the people of their constituencies? Correct me if I'm wrong. It's just been pointed out that JRM and Redwood aren't either. Very weak arguement and totally should be dismissed
What do you think a fudge means?Erm is that because you cant explain it![]()
Yep read it. You said they wont respect the wishes of the people they represent. Are JRM or Redwood doing that?Seriously bob are you a bit? Not being nasty but you don't seem to be able to understand a simple post. read my post again before you try to sound clever before shooting yourself in the foot.
Fudge is a type of sugar candy that is made by mixing sugar, butter and milk, heating it to the soft-ball stage at 240 °F, and then beating the mixture while it cools so that it acquires a smooth, creamy consistency.What do you think a fudge means?
They are respecting the overall referendum result... that's how our system works and has for years. It's not hard to work out.... or maybe it is?Yep read it. You said they wont respect the wishes of the people they represent. Are JRM or Redwood doing that?
Spot on.Fudge is a type of sugar candy that is made by mixing sugar, butter and milk, heating it to the soft-ball stage at 240 °F, and then beating the mixture while it cools so that it acquires a smooth, creamy consistency.
Your words not mine dear ellers. You were just corrected by sb73 take it on the chin ladThe are respecting the overall referendum result... that's how our system works and has for years. It's not hard to work out.... or maybe it is?

Where do you get your information from?Spot on.so you can work things out. On another note I hear plasterboard is cheaper in Homebase next week... fill your boots.

His argument was weak and he knows it. I don't need to take anything on the chin. Unless of course you or SB want to prove me wrong in that the MP's in question are not respecting the overall result?Your words not mine dear ellers. You were just corrected by sb73 take it on the chin lad![]()