Off Topic The Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should the UK remain a part of the EU or leave?

  • Stay in

    Votes: 56 47.9%
  • Get out

    Votes: 61 52.1%

  • Total voters
    117
  • Poll closed .
I would also remember all of these countries that are making this hard for their own gain? When we get rid of May and get in a strong Brexitier leader in the tables will turn.
I don't honestly think there is enough time for another leader to do anything different. The Tory government would still be divided as would parliment.
 
Let's take this crap one step at a time:
1) I haven't always said we should give something to the 48%, I have been won over to that opinion by reasoned debate.
If you ever acknowledged anything anyone said you'd know that
2) No, I don't believe that May, Ollie Robbins or any of the remainers at the top of the political elite ever tried to negotiate with a tough stance. They never, ever intended to honour the result which is why leave supporting brexit secretaries had to resign.
I believe that a good deal would have been forged by being serious about leaving with no deal and preparing for that outcome from day one.
Instead they all capitulated to ensure the empasse we have today.
3) Yes the EU would have comprimised if they believed we were serious about walking away. They knew we weren't.
4) I am not an arrogant nationalist, I am a patriot. There's a world of difference, but I wouldn't expect you to ever understand that. I do believe that we are a force in the world. We are the world's 5th largest economy and it's financial centre.
5) Please show me where I have said the following that you quoted, "I realise that there will be some pain, but I'll be alright because I've planned for my future so I'll be alright and the victims should have as well".
This is pure bullshit made up by you. I've never said I've planned for the future, other than I was prepared to take a small financial hit for a principal that I believed in. I never called anyone a victim or said that they should have prepared for disaster. I've never believed it would be the Armageddon being predicted by the scaremongering from remain.
If you read what I'd said you'd know this, but you're too arrogant in your own views to do that.
6) It's not my Tory government, I didn't vote for them at the last election.
Again you lie by saying I've said I'm on the right. I've always said I'm centre right.
Again you ignore what people really say in order to slag them off.
So, in conclusion and without further ado.....


Get your ****ing facts right before making personal attacks on me.
Get your head out of your Tory hating arse and see that there are more opinions than just your warped view of this country and the world.
Top post Col.

On 2 and 3, with the benefit of hindsight I agree. We should have kicked off by telling the EU that our interpretation of the referendum result was a desire for a clean break. Then the EU would have had the task of coming up with answers for the Irish border etc. If they are serious about standing behind Ireland they have to make us an acceptable offer, the Irish will suffer even more than us from a no deal Brexit (well, that’s what economists say).

And it’s probably what we should do now, but she’s out begging for favours instead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rangercol
I would also remember all of these countries that are making this hard for their own gain? When we get rid of May and get in a strong Brexitier leader in the tables will turn.

The Tories can't hang around. There's discussion about her coming back to Parliament during January. This is too late in my view. If she comes back from the Continent with nothing (which she will) then there needs to be change of leader asap. If the leadership appointment is contested, it would take six weeks, taking us to late Jan, which, if preparations are continuing apace for no deal, is just about long enough for the new leader to prepare for the end of March exit
 
No point in using or even mentioning hindsight

Complete nothing waste of time and oxygen imo
We can clearly see the results plus I still believe it was manufactured in this way

A Poker game in theatre May was always the sacrifice she is not a true PM proven fact

In the job by default simple fact

Let’s also be fair now today
The EU has conducted itself very fairly indeed
They are imo real politicians of today

We will never have a no deal it will go to the wire until Brexit is convincingly crushed one way or another
 
I don't honestly think there is enough time for another leader to do anything different. The Tory government would still be divided as would parliment.
The Tories would be divided Deal, no deal, Brexit, No Brexit.
 
No point in using or even mentioning hindsight

Complete nothing waste of time and oxygen imo
We can clearly see the results plus I still believe it was manufactured in this way

A Poker game in theatre May was always the sacrifice she is not a true PM proven fact

In the job by default simple fact

Let’s also be fair now today
The EU has conducted itself very fairly indeed
They are imo real politicians of today

We will never have a no deal it will go to the wire until Brexit is convincingly crushed one way or another
Let the EU come up with a deal which they believe will get through our Parliament then, if no deal is not an option. We have proved that we don’t have the minerals or talent in our political system to do it. I haven’t seen anything from them to make me think they are any better, but it’s their turn to have a go.
 
The Tories can't hang around. There's discussion about her coming back to Parliament during January. This is too late in my view. If she comes back from the Continent with nothing (which she will) then there needs to be change of leader asap. If the leadership appointment is contested, it would take six weeks, taking us to late Jan, which, if preparations are continuing apace for no deal, is just about long enough for the new leader to prepare for the end of March exit
Goldie I am listening to various media and they are turning on her. One MP (remainer) has told Sky that, "She will be gone by Christmas". Another has said he “has lost confidence in her”. Apparently more letters have gone in. Sadly we don’t know how many. I also think that the 3 options on the table for Tories are “No deal”/“another vote”/“Corbyn” . I see a ‘No deal’ more than ever now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Goldhawk-Road
Let the EU come up with a deal which they believe will get through our Parliament then, if no deal is not an option. We have proved that we don’t have the minerals or talent in our political system to do it. I haven’t seen anything from them to make me think they are any better, but it’s their turn to have a go.
Maybe we should get the EU to disband? That way we can make everyone happy over Brexit. We will also save them 10 years.:1980_boogie_down:
 
Goldie I am listening to various media and they are turning on her. One MP (remainer) has told Sky that, "She will be gone by Christmas". Another has said he “has lost confidence in her”. Apparently more letters have gone in. Sadly we don’t know how many. I also think that the 3 options on the table for Tories are “No deal”/“another vote”/“Corbyn” . I see a ‘No deal’ more than ever now.

Yes, we're heading for WTO terms, but I think we'll get a better deal before that because WTO is the last thing Ireland wants, and won't do any good for the rest of the EU. For the UK, we don't pay out £37bn and solve the Brexit question. But none of this will happen under May. The only exception I can think of is if she is forced to be answerable to a Cabal (an inner cabinet dominated by Brexit ministers), so stays as a figurehead but with no real power. I don't know whether this is possible - I haven't heard it canvassed on the media
 
  • Like
Reactions: ELLERS
Let the EU come up with a deal which they believe will get through our Parliament then, if no deal is not an option. We have proved that we don’t have the minerals or talent in our political system to do it. I haven’t seen anything from them to make me think they are any better, but it’s their turn to have a go.

Sky are reporting that what is bemusing the EU is that they thought they had got a fantastic deal, which May and Ollie Robbins said would get through Parliament. Then May doesn't put it to Parliament. It's May and her team's ineptitude that has caused this current issue and for once, I have some sympathy for the EU who thought they had it in the bag.

May is now talking about not having a vote in Parliament on her deal until January, presumably in the hope that time pressures before March will push Parliament to vote for it. I just cannot see the Tories allowing her to play it this way, but we'll see.
 
May is now talking about not having a vote in Parliament on her deal until January, presumably in the hope that time pressures before March will push Parliament to vote for it. I just cannot see the Tories allowing her to play it this way, but we'll see.
Yeah the guy on the radio said the same. The later the date the more chance of a 'No deal" but also makes everone think MP's/EU.
 
Another young person (teacher) on Sky who voted remain now would vote Leave.
I will post something later from a reporter on the radio which was really interesting.
 
Yes, we're heading for WTO terms, but I think we'll get a better deal before that because WTO is the last thing Ireland wants, and won't do any good for the rest of the EU. For the UK, we don't pay out £37bn and solve the Brexit question. But none of this will happen under May. The only exception I can think of is if she is forced to be answerable to a Cabal (an inner cabinet dominated by Brexit ministers), so stays as a figurehead but with no real power. I don't know whether this is possible - I haven't heard it canvassed on the media

Spot on. WTO will not be the end of the world - but it will bring on some very different challenges.
The biggest change and danger will come from the EU. They have up to now been able to stay together, once there is a No Deal - how long do you think that lasts for?
The EU wants one thing and one thing only - to remain in absolute power, it can't, if we continue these trends the move to the Right will gather even further momentum and the house will come tumbling down anyway.
The EU have been bullies to Greece - We just read the media that tells us they are lazy bastards, but the reality is as with the UK, that their own politcos were/are useless, and people were **** scared of the worst case scenario.
The EU have been bullies to Spain - How could they just stand by and watch 60% youth unemployment - but the reality is as with the UK, that thier own polticos were/are useless, and people were **** scared of the worst case scenario.
The EU has tried to be a bully to the UK - the reality is that their own politicos are so uselss that people are in doubt and fear this "worst case scenario"

The story goes on and on - can anyone see a trend here that National politics has lost all its quality within the EU?
Name me one Gov't that is considered strong and liked by its electorate?

Once WTO has settled down and everyone has worked out it's not a killer - guess what will happen then?

As a negotiator for the UK - I'd enter with the opening gambit that not actually are we planning for WTO, we actively want it, and will make it work.
It will take the Mother of all agreements to take us away from that position - no ****ed up Norway deal for the UK.
It takes a strong Gov't which the EU has managed to erode from everyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rangercol
Do the people on here and elsewhere that speak blithely about No Deal and WTO really think that this is an acceptable or even attractive outcome? I can just about understand our using it as some kind of reckless brinkmanship in negotiating, but there are people around who seem to relish the prospect of it actually happening. Talk about 'enemy within'.
 
Spot on. WTO will not be the end of the world - but it will bring on some very different challenges.
The biggest change and danger will come from the EU. They have up to now been able to stay together, once there is a No Deal - how long do you think that lasts for?
The EU wants one thing and one thing only - to remain in absolute power, it can't, if we continue these trends the move to the Right will gather even further momentum and the house will come tumbling down anyway.
The EU have been bullies to Greece - We just read the media that tells us they are lazy bastards, but the reality is as with the UK, that their own politcos were/are useless, and people were **** scared of the worst case scenario.
The EU have been bullies to Spain - How could they just stand by and watch 60% youth unemployment - but the reality is as with the UK, that thier own polticos were/are useless, and people were **** scared of the worst case scenario.
The EU has tried to be a bully to the UK - the reality is that their own politicos are so uselss that people are in doubt and fear this "worst case scenario"

The story goes on and on - can anyone see a trend here that National politics has lost all its quality within the EU?
Name me one Gov't that is considered strong and liked by its electorate?

Once WTO has settled down and everyone has worked out it's not a killer - guess what will happen then?

As a negotiator for the UK - I'd enter with the opening gambit that not actually are we planning for WTO, we actively want it, and will make it work.
It will take the Mother of all agreements to take us away from that position - no ****ed up Norway deal for the UK.
It takes a strong Gov't which the EU has managed to erode from everyone.
Top Post <applause>
and
The biggest change and danger will come from the EU. They have up to now been able to stay together, once there is a No Deal - how long do you think that lasts for?
1 day.