Straw man.Godwin's law strike three Ellers! ;-)
Straw man.Godwin's law strike three Ellers! ;-)
There may well come a time Goldie, hopefully not in our lifetimes, when climate change makes large parts of currently densely populated countries uninhabitable. Then we will see waves of human migration which will dwarf what we saw from Syria/Afghanistan/Africa. Many, perhaps most will die in the process, but there will still be many millions clamouring to get into the habitable zones.Density - If you look at my post I said England. That's where immigrants are settling. They don't want to go to the Scottish Highlands.
Population levels have a huge effect on the environment. We're losing large numbers of species due in part to the intensification of agricultue. Look at infrastructure. We don't have it for 100 million people. Increasing it would conflict with the idea of using the countryside for recreation. Quality of life matters.
There may well come a time Goldie, hopefully not in our lifetimes, when climate change makes large parts of currently densely populated countries uninhabitable. Then we will see waves of human migration which will dwarf what we saw from Syria/Afghanistan/Africa. Many, perhaps most will die in the process, but there will still be many millions clamouring to get into the habitable zones.
Then the question becomes ‘my quality of life versus your actual life’. Tough one.
The dilemma that Windsor poses is accurate though. Our natural rate of population growth (without immigration) will soon slip into the negative, like Japan and Italy, and like Germany soon, while there are more and more aged/retired, heavy health care users. We either need more young taxpayers from abroad (who go home when they are old with company pensions), or we work more years potentially never retiring, or we cull the old. Or we agree en masse that we will take a collective hit to our standard of living, enjoy a flat or shrinking and aging population (which does have some attractions), and tax those still in work more to pay for it all. Or we abandon elements of the welfare state that we take for granted now. Loads of issues and I have no idea which direction keeps most people relatively happy, or at least not as furious as they could be.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/..._ruling_after_nazis_march_in_charlottesville/Godwin's law strike three Ellers! ;-)
You have educated me as I hadn't heard of it before... It must be some young internet lolz stuff To be honest I haven't looked at the philosophy behind it, but will tomorrow.Ha! Although comparing people waving Nazi flags to Nazis is a tiny little bit different from comparing those who don't want to leave the EU to Nazis...
logans run at 70You're missing the most fun suggestion - all those aged under 35 incentivised into copious levels of coitus until we have a healthy level of young worker bees!![]()
You have educated me as I hadn't heard of it before... It must be some young internet lolz stuff To be honest I haven't looked at the philosophy behind it, but will tomorrow.
There may well come a time Goldie, hopefully not in our lifetimes, when climate change makes large parts of currently densely populated countries uninhabitable. Then we will see waves of human migration which will dwarf what we saw from Syria/Afghanistan/Africa. Many, perhaps most will die in the process, but there will still be many millions clamouring to get into the habitable zones.
Then the question becomes ‘my quality of life versus your actual life’. Tough one.
The dilemma that Windsor poses is accurate though. Our natural rate of population growth (without immigration) will soon slip into the negative, like Japan and Italy, and like Germany soon, while there are more and more aged/retired, heavy health care users. We either need more young taxpayers from abroad (who go home when they are old with company pensions), or we work more years potentially never retiring, or we cull the old. Or we agree en masse that we will take a collective hit to our standard of living, enjoy a flat or shrinking and aging population (which does have some attractions), and tax those still in work more to pay for it all. Or we abandon elements of the welfare state that we take for granted now. Loads of issues and I have no idea which direction keeps most people relatively happy, or at least not as furious as they could be.
What?
You out of touch my baby
Meltdown ?
I live there ask Dave life continues
Individual EEA countries can do and are doing what they like regarding migration. Follow the basic EU rules only as and when they need to, as the UK could. As others have said it seems to me the UK is going to need people to pick the fruit, staff the NHS etc etc.I think we've all agreed on this board that the high scale of immigration into this country was a significant factor in the Leave result. The Norway model doesn't address this in the slightest.
That is fine and if people need to do these seasonal jobs they have a seasonal contract. It's project fear MkIIII. Most people don't have a problem with people coming here to work. We are an open society that gives people from other countries a chance. That's why they all want to come here.Individual EEA countries can do and are doing what they like regarding migration. Follow the basic EU rules only as and when they need to, as the UK could. As others have said it seems to me the UK is going to need people to pick the fruit, staff the NHS etc etc.
An interesting poll carried out by YouGov in the past few days has appeared. It polled approx 21,000 potential voters across GB (not NI, for some legal reason) and asked them to say what their age was, which constituency they lived in and to rank three possible outcomes in order of preference...
Leave (No Deal), Leave (Mays Deal) or Remain.
Then, using different methods for analysing the answers, which are explained quite comprehensively in the report and underpin the highlights/graphs on the website, they came up with some things to think about. Different things will be more important to different people, of course.
The link should be here... https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politic...brexit-deal-leads-just-two-constituencies-it-
What popped up for me?
My constituency, Christchurch (and the odious Mr Chope), is one of only two in the country that actually prefer Mays Deal to anything else. (It was the constituency with the biggest Leave majority in 2016). Who knew that when they voted Leave, it was something like Mays Deal that they meant? Or, at least, not No Deal. Or maybe it was No Deal in 2016 but they've changed their minds... Anyway, it will be interesting to see how Chope votes on Mays Deal if they ever get round to holding it.
There were some interesting comments about voting switchers between 2016 (Ref) and 2017 (GElection) which I didn't expect.
What the survey does help to show is how shoddy and ill-informed the process has been since 2016. No wonder the swivel-eyed blowers of dog whistles have been able to twist a small preference for Leave into whatever they say it means to further their own ends.
I got asked to do a phone survey just before the referendum. The bloke was totally unprofessional because he kept agreeing with my answers!An honest question, have you or anyone you know ever been asked to take part in one of these ‘political’ polls/surveys ?
Is it the same people they ask each time or are you picked at random ?
Do you get a call to take part or email or a letter ?
Personally I’ve never been asked and I don’t know of anyone who ever has been asked or taken part. It’s almost as if they might make them up, just to fit that weeks agenda.
There are companies you can sign up to that do these surveys. You get paid as well. I have been on 2 before and just told them what they wanted to hear, took the cash and went. Who was it that said ”never trust a poll”? If they ever asked me I would just say ”I am a remainer”.An honest question, have you or anyone you know ever been asked to take part in one of these ‘political’ polls/surveys ?
Is it the same people they ask each time or are you picked at random ?
Do you get a call to take part or email or a letter ?
Personally I’ve never been asked and I don’t know of anyone who ever has been asked or taken part. It’s almost as if they might make them up, just to fit that weeks agenda.