Off Topic The Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should the UK remain a part of the EU or leave?

  • Stay in

    Votes: 56 47.9%
  • Get out

    Votes: 61 52.1%

  • Total voters
    117
  • Poll closed .
....and I thought us liberal types were considered the over sensitive ones who get outraged by everying on other people's behalves.

In a thread littered with the Tories and Labour being branded racist (without any real outrage, more as a point scoring exercise) everyone is suddenly after blood for a poster saying there was racism in this thread but not naming anyone and withdrawing from further debate.

Look up irony, you precious little flowers. :D
 
....and I thought us liberal types were considered the over sensitive ones who get outraged by everying on other people's behalves.

In a thread littered with the Tories and Labour being branded racist (without any real outrage, more as a point scoring exercise) everyone is suddenly after blood for a poster saying there was racism in this thread but not naming anyone and withdrawing from further debate.

Look up irony, you precious little flowers. :D

Sorry, but that just won't do imo.
Firstly, I don't agree with that analogy and secondly, I haven't seen anyone "going after blood".
Imo it's only fair to ask a poster to back up allegations of racism against fellow posters.
 
Here's the Kaepernick ad. Quite good, I think.

You must log in or register to see media

Meanwhile the Ford Motor Company, which owns the Detroit Lions, has put out a statement backing the 'kneelers' right to protest. I wonder if the rednecks will start burning their Mustangs.
 
....and I thought us liberal types were considered the over sensitive ones who get outraged by everying on other people's behalves.

In a thread littered with the Tories and Labour being branded racist (without any real outrage, more as a point scoring exercise) everyone is suddenly after blood for a poster saying there was racism in this thread but not naming anyone and withdrawing from further debate.

Look up irony, you precious little flowers. :D

What a load of ****e
 
  • Like
Reactions: DT’s Socks
Sorry, but that just won't do imo.
Firstly, I don't agree with that analogy and secondly, I haven't seen anyone "going after blood".
Imo it's only fair to ask a poster to back up allegations of racism against fellow posters.
But if nobody is named them who can be offended by it? If nobody has said anything racist then it's just a throwaway comment and incorrect at that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DT’s Socks
Here's the Kaepernick ad. Quite good, I think.

You must log in or register to see media

Meanwhile the Ford Motor Company, which owns the Detroit Lions, has put out a statement backing the 'kneelers' right to protest. I wonder if the rednecks will start burning their Mustangs.

That's one pretty wicked advert. Thanks for sharing and very inspiring
 
Said before given the right scenario
Everyone on here would naturally show racist tendencies

I believe you would be lying to yourself
The British must be right up there in the racist table

Would take just another Falkland example and we would all be at it guaranteed imo

As soon as a designed news story comes on about a individual without knowing it many lump on a scenario label

Just because some in the past hit the streets to march against race only made them seem extreme. Of course this was not acceptable and isn’t now

We are only a few feet away from a racist each day I believe

Plus it not white on Black it works all ways
 
But if nobody is named them who can be offended by it? If nobody has said anything racist then it's just a throwaway comment and incorrect at that.

A little naive. Ever heard of inference and innuendo?

Nines is right. If allegations of racism are thrown around liberally (no pun intended) , it waters down the meaning of the term (and stymies debate)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: rangercol
UK employers hire staff at fastest pace in five months - REC
2 Min Read
LONDON (Reuters) - British employers hired permanent staff at the fastest rate in five months in August, a recruiters’ body said on Friday, but it questioned how long this would continue in the face of uncertainty about Brexit.
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images

FILE PHOTO: People cast long shadows in the winter sunlight as they walk across a plaza in the Canary Wharf financial district of London, Britain, January 17, 2018. REUTERS/Dylan Martinez/File Photo
The Recruitment and Employment Confederation (REC) report also showed starting salaries for permanent staff picked up last month at the second-fastest pace in more than three years.
Sponsored
Overall the monthly survey, produced with data firm IHS Markit, added to signs of a tightening labour market in Britain, with companies struggling to find the workers they need.
Net migration of European Union nationals into Britain has fallen markedly since British voters opted to leave the bloc in a June 2016 referendum.
But employment has continued to grow strongly and the unemployment rate has fallen to its lowest levels since the mid-1970s.
“How long our labour market can defy gravity if the shape of our future trading arrangements with the EU remain unclear is the big question,” REC chief executive Neil Carberry said.
“Companies are starting to implement contingency plans now — and those who aren’t will need to step up progress.”
Prime Minister Theresa May has yet to strike a deal with the EU on Britain’s departure from the bloc, raising the prospect of an economically damaging Brexit in less than seven months’ time.
Despite the fall in unemployment, official wage growth measures have not risen notably although they are largely in line with the forecasts of the Bank of England. It raised interest rates last month, saying it saw signs of inflation pressure from the labour market.
Official data last month showed net migration of European Union citizens into Britain fell to its lowest level since 2012 in the year to March, but this was more than outweighed by a record influx of non-EU citizens.
 
Investigation launched after Iranian state TV films private Labour meeting
Press TV broadcasts from inside a "no confidence" vote against the chair of Labour Friends of Israel, Joan Ryan.
14:54, UK,Friday 07 September 2018
You must log in or register to see images

Image: Enfield North party chair Siddo Dwyer announces the result. Pic:@PressTVUK
By Aubrey Allegretti, political reporter
Labour party bosses are scrambling to uncover how Iranian state television was able to broadcast from a vote of no confidence in an MP who chairs its pro-Israel group.
An investigation has been launched after footage emerged on Press TV's UK Twitter account of an emergency meeting held on the future of Joan Ryan, Enfield North MP and head of Labour Friends of Israel.
Pictures and videos posted from the Iranian state broadcaster showed crowds whooping and cheering as Ms Ryan narrowly lost the vote of no confidence by 94 votes to 92.
It reported on "minor disputes" and "small spats", describing Ms Ryan as an "anti-Corbyn rebel" who was "trying to defend herself to members".
Labour deputy leader Tom Watson said it was "impossible to fathom" how the broadcaster was able to release clips from inside the meeting.
"This disorder makes a farce of the proceedings and is not how the modern Labour Party should conduct its affairs," he said.
Chair of the local Enfield North party, Siddo Dwyer, called it "totally unacceptable" and vowed to complain to Press TV.
He suggested the identity of the Press TV employee was known, saying they had been given a "direct warning".
"It didn't occur to any of us at the time that they were from a state broadcaster," Mr Dwyer added.
You must log in or register to see images

Image: Labour deputy leader Tom Watson said the 'disorder' was a 'farce'
:: Labour may not be 'taken back' from left, Blair admits
Roshan Salih, who describes himself as a journalist for Press TV on Twitter, said "no announcement was made that filming was prohibited".
"Footage we got was openly filmed and no-one tried to stop filming - so we just did our jobs," he wrote. "Perhaps Labour Enfield need to answer some questions if filming wasn't allowed."
In a separate message, he wrote: "So it seems that the media has decided that Joan Ryan MP losing a no confidence vote last night is NOT the story.
"The real story, of course, is that Press TV filmed it. Perhaps the British media should have done their jobs and reported the story."
Ms Ryan, who has represented Enfield North since 1997, said she "fought the hard left to a virtual draw" in the vote of no confidence.
She added: "I did so in the face of a well organised, secret and long-planned divisive campaign led by party-within-a-party Momentum.
"This was about antisemitism in the Labour party and those of us who have stood by the Jewish community and said 'enough is enough'.
"I made no apologies last night for that and I make no apologies now."
You must log in or register to see images

Image: Joan Ryan said the vote 'was about antisemitism'
Luton South MP Gavin Shuker also lost a no-confidence vote on Thursday called by local Labour members.
He said: "It's not part of any formal procedure, so it changes nothing about my role as Labour MP for Luton South.
"I'm really sorry a handful of people in the Labour Party want to overturn your vote of confidence in me last year.
"Their actions say far less about me - and you - than they do about the face of today's Labour Party.
"I've not changed, but the Labour Party has."
You must log in or register to see images

Image: Gavin Shuker also lost a vote of no confidence called by local members
Ms Ryan won 58% of the vote in Enfield North at the general election last year - with the highest number of votes achieved by a Labour candidate since the seat was created.
Mr Shuker won 62% of the vote last year, with the same record.
A London Labour Party spokesperson told Sky News: "Filming of local Labour Party meetings is not permitted, and Enfield North will be reminded of this fact.
 
the gangs in hayes and southall have no imagination


This map shows the patchwork of gangs who control different streets in London as violence continues to spiral in the capital
You must log in or register to see images

1. DBG
2. 9th Street
3. 22GZ (Wood Green)
4. OFB (Broadwater Farm)
5. Sin Squad/ NPK
6. [HASHTAG]#900[/HASHTAG]
7. #AP / GMG
8. CHINGBLOCK
9. DRIVE
10. [HASHTAG]#LEYTONSTONE[/HASHTAG]
11. 7th gang
12. 12th Manor Park
13. iLLMADE
14. 8910
15. Barking
16. 6th gang
17. Custom House Gang
18. 13th gang
19. 15th gang
20. [HASHTAG]#HOMERTON[/HASHTAG]
21. London Fields
22. Holly Street
23. Lisson Green Mandem/ Edgeware Road Boys
24. ER
25. Harrow Road Boys
26. 1011
27. ICB (Ice City Boys)
28. SUSPECT GANG (USG) 29. 12World/12Anti
30. 3rd Set
31. N-GANG
32. Southall
33. Hayes

34. 37/OJB
35. 17/PriceyWorld/Wano Rd
36. KuKu/BP
37. Moscow17
38. AY gang
39. B-Town
40. Ghetto Boys
41. 10th (G-Town)
42. OCB/YCB (Cherry Boys)
43. Woolwich Boys
44. GS (Greenside)
45. AWB (Abbey Wood Boys)
46. Parkside
47. Splash Gang
48. BSIDE 785
49. 23 [HASHTAG]#GMASH[/HASHTAG]
50. AR (ARMED RESPONSE)
51. Monson Bloodset
52. Queens Road NM/2
53. PR15/NBR
54. Zone 2
55. 198 BLOCK 5
56. 410 gang
57. Cassava
58. MBlock
59. Claptown
60. 67 Gang
61. 417 Tooting
62. [HASHTAG]#Mitcham[/HASHTAG]
63. CRO
64. CR7
65. M20/SMG
66. Gipset
67. UpTop
68. LTH
 
  • Like
Reactions: Goldhawk-Road
wouldnt another falklands be nationalistic rather than racist
how small would any british convoy be these days anyway
They wouldn't need the boats. They have the proper aircraft to sort them out quickly if they tried it again. That was the problem the first time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: kiwiqpr
Eh?
I know you're an intelligent guy, so I'll assume you're on the wind up.
Sorry, I saw your response and couldn't resist that one.

For what it's worth, I don't think anyone on here is racist.

I do believe that we all have inherent prejudices (me included) based on a complex mix of race, wealth, gender, sexual orientation, religion and geographic identity but it's massively unlikely to result in a blanket hatred of any race (although can happen in particularly hate filled few).