Another post of consummate bollox...

Robert Fisk:
I note that the 'usual suspects' have been silent on the Windrush scandal and the wider fallout from May's despicable 'hostile environment' policy. If she was still Home Secretary, she would surely have been forced to resign.
Be careful, you're going to wake Ellers up!I note that the 'usual suspects' have been silent on the Windrush scandal and the wider fallout from May's despicable 'hostile environment' policy. If she was still Home Secretary, she would surely have been forced to resign.
I note that the 'usual suspects' have been silent on the Windrush scandal and the wider fallout from May's despicable 'hostile environment' policy. If she was still Home Secretary, she would surely have been forced to resign.
"Hostile environment", as applied to illegal immigrants, was a phrase first used by Labour while in government. I have no problem with it and if it was down to me, I'd have backed David Blunkett's proposal for smart identity cards so we take only legal migrants and know who we have in the country.
Once the current Home Office Windrush debacle has been rectified, and genuine complainants given UK status and suitable compensation, there needs to be an inquiry into what went wrong. I suspect one issue is that the Home Office is still not, as Labour pointed out while in government, "fit for purpose."
As yes, of course, it's either Labour's fault or it's the Home Office. When will these people take responsibility for anything? Theresa was right when she said this about ministerial responsibility...
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/en...signation-emerges_uk_5ad8a401e4b0e4d0715defe8
The existence of the term 'hostile environment' under Labour, like the distraction over when the decision was taken to destroy landing cards (it was implemented under May) is just another attempt to the deflect blame. The Windrush debacle is not a Home Office scandal, it's a Government scandal, and all fingers should be pointed at Theresa May - who was warned by Diane Abbott in 2014 about the potential damage to legal immigrants of her nasty, racist policies.
It's not racist to take stringent measures against illegal immigrants, even if Jeremy Corbyn and his antisemitic supporters say it is. There's been a cock-up at the Home Office, apologies have been given and when the full facts are known, ministerial responsibility will be clearer
It wasn't a 'cock-up at the Home Office', it was policy. The potential impact on Windrush and other commonwealth immigrants was known by ministers, but May decided that it was worth it if she could satisfy the anti-immigrant hysteria of the time - she could deport first and hear appeals later. She must not be allowed to get away with this.
Here's an interesting quote from Baroness Warsi on the Peston programme, citing weekly incidents of Islamophobic racism in the Tory party. I look forward to the media furore over this, with every Tory politician appearing on TV or radio being quizzed about Tory racism before they can deal with the issue that they were invited on to discuss.....
You must log in or register to see media
I sense you're trying to balance off the proven and despicable antisemitic abuse against Jewish people from Corbyn activists with vague and unproven Islamaphobia in the Tory party. The interview with Warsi was anodyne. Naturally, ministers fears at the time resulted from a string of deadly terrorist incidents.
It has not been proven that May or Rudd knew that genuine claimants were being denied citizenship, merely that there was a lack of care about the ambit of Home Office illegal immigration measures including, probably, from ministers, hence the apologies and agreement to make compensation