Pat nails it ........
You must log in or register to see media
To be clear, I'm not telling anyone to shut up or not give opinions and for Willy............my main reason for voting leave had nothing to do with immigration, although I do think it is a concern in some areas. I just feel that asking for a second referendum is not on.
Should we now re-run every referendum that we've ever had as we now, inevitably have more information available than when the votes happened?
Like Goldie has chosen to do, I tried to stay away from this thread as we all just repeat our particular opinions on the matter. I failed to do so, but I'm going to give it another go as we just go around in circles.
Hope to see you at a game sometime.
It really depends on the importance of the issue as to whether we revisit. We were not going to go to war in 1939, having determined in Parliament that a policy of appeasement with Germany was our decision. We all know how that changed.
There have been plenty of laws that were passed, and then repealed or changed, over the years, as we learnt more about the issue.
Why should this be any different?
You joke, but seriously, some of the anti-european vitriol I've seen makes me wonder of some people wouldn't see that as a good thing...I agree. Let's declare war again.![]()
Pat nails it ........
You must log in or register to see media
B - Liam Fox... or to give him his full title - the disgraced former defence secretary, Dr Liam Fox - a proven expenses cheat that in 2009 was found to have the largest over-claim on expenses, and as a result was forced to repay the most money.
You wouldn't believe he got his own way would you?Pat nails it ........
You must log in or register to see media
You wouldn't believe he got his own way would you?
He's spent years posting anti religious, and especially anti Islamic, pieces, which of course I applaud, in spirit if not in detail (I haven't listened to them). Dawkins used to like him. He has also variously come out in favour of Geert Wilders, the EDL and the much more moderate UKIP.Smug, moi?
For someone who's definitely not a bit racist or xenophobic, he seems rather preoccupied with the 'dregs of humanity' coming to rape our women.
Oh no Col, he made his point for himself. Inspired me to look him up.Stan and Strolls kind of make his point for him with their responses.
Agree that was wrong but people listened to Tony Blair about the EU yet he was a war criminal that lied to the country costing many British soldiers their lives and many thousands of foreign families.
He's spent years posting anti religious, and especially anti Islamic, pieces, which of course I applaud, in spirit if not in detail (I haven't listened to them). Dawkins used to like him. He has also variously come out in favour of Geert Wilders, the EDL and the much more moderate UKIP.
What I wonder is if he has an Irish passport as he was born in Dublin.
Here's a much too reasonable response to his anti 48% rant:
https://llblawg.com/2017/04/04/my-open-letter-to-pat-condell-re-brexit/
The thing is, though I have taken an instant dislike to him, I can totally understand the fundamental point he is trying to make (or one of them at least) that for some people this was about gut feel, some kind of principle, it really was about 'taking back control' not just on a national but a personal level too. The lack of respect between both sides makes it easier for him to express his frustration with those us us who saw it as a calculation in terms of bile and hatred (totally missing the irony of attacking his own fellow Brits, where his anger is usually reserved for foreigners it seems). It is incredibly frustrating for both sides of the arguments because our terms of reference are completely different. And the result is division and trench warfare. Probably would have been the same if the result were the other way round too.
Quite... a respectful and measured response... unlike the original.
Yes. Clever of you to change the subject nicely as the right have gone off to sulk. How far are we with electric car technology? The idea appeals to me but for someone who regularly drives across the country because I have to, it makes no sense yet because batteries don't have enough capacity to get you there and back on one charge. Also, I don't fancy spending days at a time at charging points waiting in a queue to pay a price that is equivalent to the cost of a tank of petro/diesel. At least I think that's the case because if you ever look for any pricing it ain't there. Presumably it lights up and tells you once you've plugged in and given your credit card details. Are there many charging points about in city centres yet? Newcastle has a fewAre they going to ban all combustion engine vehicles or just cars? Strikes me lorries, buses, coaches, tractors, motorbikes, scooters the lot need to be taken out for this to make sense. And planes.
The thing is, though I have taken an instant dislike to him, I can totally understand the fundamental point he is trying to make (or one of them at least) that for some people this was about gut feel, some kind of principle, it really was about 'taking back control' not just on a national but a personal level too. The lack of respect between both sides makes it easier for him to express his frustration with those us us who saw it as a calculation in terms of bile and hatred (totally missing the irony of attacking his own fellow Brits, where his anger is usually reserved for foreigners it seems). It is incredibly frustrating for both sides of the arguments because our terms of reference are completely different. And the result is division and trench warfare. Probably would have been the same if the result were the other way round too.
The scary thing his his and others' frustration and anger will only grow, as it becomes clear that even if we go through with Brexit, everything will feel the same or worse at a national, and for many, personal, level. No 'control' meaningful to an individual will be won back.
Are they going to ban all combustion engine vehicles or just cars? Strikes me lorries, buses, coaches, tractors, motorbikes, scooters the lot need to be taken out for this to make sense. And planes.
Volvo will only sell electric cars in three years, Britain and France will only sell/makl electric cars from 2040. It will happen very quickly, you had better get used to it.Yes. Clever of you to change the subject nicely as the right have gone off to sulk. How far are we with electric car technology? The idea appeals to me but for someone who regularly drives across the country because I have to, it makes no sense yet because batteries don't have enough capacity to get you there and back on one charge. Also, I don't fancy spending days at a time at charging points waiting in a queue to pay a price that is equivalent to the cost of a tank of petro/diesel. At least I think that's the case because if you ever look for any pricing it ain't there. Presumably it lights up and tells you once you've plugged in and given your credit card details. Are there many charging points about in city centres yet? Newcastle has a few
For someone who's definitely not a bit racist or xenophobic, he seems rather preoccupied with the 'dregs of humanity' coming to rape our women.