Really? Give me strengthBecause after years on the EU gravy train, he's so inculcated with its doctrinal messages, his loyalties to his own country come second and he's lost all sense of objectivity
Really? Give me strengthBecause after years on the EU gravy train, he's so inculcated with its doctrinal messages, his loyalties to his own country come second and he's lost all sense of objectivity
Oh come on. Goldie's famous for his objectivity.Really? Give me strength
Really? Give me strength
Oh come on. Goldie's famous for his objectivity.
Bloody hell, a traitor indeed! Such paranoia.
Same reason the elitist right, and for that matter elitists of any shade, are equally disdainful probably. They believe they know better. I should know, I wear my elitist badge with pride. I have Theresa and Nigel to thank for opening my eyes to my true place in this country, and I'm really enjoying the feeling.
Rogers was retiring in November anyway. What the negotiators have lost is someone who knows the people on the other side of the table very well, and has some insight into what they want. In my experience Dipper's take on civil servants is correct (I went through the Civil Service Selection Board process in 1982 (not sure if they do it now) and ended up in the Hong Kong Government for 3 years). Civil servants are given an objective, look at all the options available, recommend one (including downsides) and then implement whatever is decided. It's surprisingly easy to separate doing a professional job from your own beliefs, because the approach forces you down that route. My understanding of Rogers' resignation is that he felt he couldn't do his job because he hasn't been given any objectives, while the clock is ticking.
And as usual he is 100% correctGarage had already said they have replaced a knighted career diplomat with a
...knighted career diplomat.
You won't find me sticking up for any of the Labour mob Goldie. The extreme right is almost indistinguishable from the extreme left in that the ends always justifies the means, they are both about ideology rather than people.The extreme right don't hold the disdain for working voters that the militant end of Labour do. Emily Thornberry's nose-in-the-air tweet about the football supporting white van man who had an England flag at his window was a classic. Miliband sacked her, but Corbyn made her shadow foreign secretary. They're all out of touch, I wonder whether any of them ever leave North London.
Based on your rationale (bias?), if Miliband sacked her, they cannot "all" be out of touch.The extreme right don't hold the disdain for working voters that the militant end of Labour do. Emily Thornberry's nose-in-the-air tweet about the football supporting white van man who had an England flag at his window was a classic. Miliband sacked her, but Corbyn made her shadow foreign secretary. They're all out of touch, I wonder whether any of them ever leave North London.
Based on your rationale (bias?), if Miliband sacked her, they cannot "all" be out of touch.
You won't find me sticking up for any of the Labour mob Goldie. The extreme right is almost indistinguishable from the extreme left in that the ends always justifies the means, they are both about ideology rather than people.
If I've learned anything from the last election, referendum, US election etc it's that no party can rely on a core vote any more. Seems to me that this old left/right politics of the C20th is redundant, but we are still trapped in its vocabulary and structures, still got the same old parties.Depends what you mean by the extreme right. I suspect Nutall will be more in tune with many Labour voters than Corbyn or McDonnell
If I've learned anything from the last election, referendum, US election etc it's that no party can rely on a core vote any more. Seems to me that this old left/right politics of the C20th is redundant, but we are still trapped in its vocabulary and structures, still got the same old parties.
I've read a suggestion that we might be seeing our politics change from the right/left paradigm and morphing into libertarian vs authoritarian strands. I can understand it, and you can guess where I sit on that spectrum.
I've read a suggestion that we might be seeing our politics change from the right/left paradigm and morphing into libertarian vs authoritarian strands. I can understand it, and you can guess where I sit on that spectrum.
If I've learned anything from the last election, referendum, US election etc it's that no party can rely on a core vote any more. Seems to me that this old left/right politics of the C20th is redundant, but we are still trapped in its vocabulary and structures, still got the same old parties.
I've read a suggestion that we might be seeing our politics change from the right/left paradigm and morphing into libertarian vs authoritarian strands. I can understand it, and you can guess where I sit on that spectrum.
Let's hope so, we are badly in need of some kind of political re-alignment in this country. I have little idea how I would vote if there was a general election tomorrow.