Just another Tory story....
Braverman’s ‘crazy’ law costs £1.5m a day because 22k migrants can’t be removed (msn.com)
Braverman’s ‘crazy’ law costs £1.5m a day because 22k migrants can’t be removed (msn.com)
Off Topic The Politics Thread
- Thread starter Stroller
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Statistically you’re probably more likely to be a sex case if you’re a male Tory MP than any of the groups discussed above.
good to know
Europe needs a decade to build up arms stocks, says defence firm boss
Related Topics
Image caption,
Danish PM Mette Frederiksen, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, Defence Minister Boris Pistorius and CEO of Rheinmetall Armin Papperger visited the site of the new Rheinmetall factory in Lower Saxony
By Jessica Parker
BBC Berlin correspondent
Europe will need 10 years before it is fully ready to defend itself, the boss of Germany's biggest defence firm, Rheinmetall, told the BBC.
Armin Papperger said that ammunition stocks are currently "empty".
He made the comments during a visit by Chancellor Olaf Scholz at a foundation-laying ceremony for a major new arms manufacturing plant in Lower Saxony.
Defence Minister Boris Pistorius and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen were also in attendance.
The comments come a day after comments by US presidential hopeful Donald Trump sparked fresh alarm in Europe.
The frontrunner for the Republican nomination said he once told a world leader he would not protect Nato members who don't pay their dues and would even "encourage" aggressors to "do whatever the hell they want".
Rheinmetall has said it will invest more than $300m (£274m) in the new facility. It is eventually expected to produce 200,000 rounds of artillery shells annually.
Mr Papperger said that a "long time" would be needed to prepare against an "aggressor who wants to fight against Nato".
"We are fine in three, four years - but to be really prepared, we need 10 years," he said.
"We have to produce 1.5 million rounds [of ammunition] in Europe," Mr Papperger added. He said a vast amount of Europe's ammunition was sent to Ukraine, leaving little for European stocks.
"As long as we have war, we have to help Ukraine, but later we [will] need five years at a minimum and 10 years to really fill [ammunition stocks] up," he said.
Chancellor Scholz refused to say whether he was concerned about Mr Trump's comments, saying that he was "absolutely sure" that Nato was "of essence" for the US, Canada and European countries.
"We stick to it, the President of United States sticks to it and I'm sure the American people will do so also," he went on.
But he did say that Russian President Vladimir Putin had shown "imperial ambitions" and added: "If you want peace, you have to successfully deter possible aggressors."
Asked by the BBC whether she thought that Europe needed to be ready to go at it alone if the US withdrew its support, Ms Frederiksen said Europe had to be ready "no matter what". She added that the "more and more aggressive Russia" was proof that Europe had to scale up.
"We have to speed up and that's the reason why I'm here today," she said.
It's nearly two years since Chancellor Scholz declared Zeitenwende - a turning point in Germany's foreign and defence policy - following President Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
There was widespread recognition that a "change through trade" policy with Russia had failed.
Allies had hoped that Germany, Europe's biggest economy, would take an increasingly assertive role in security and shed its traditional caution.
Image caption,
Dr Claudia Major says Europe would not currently be able to defend itself without the help of the United States
Yet in 2023, Germany was among a majority of Nato members who were forecast to miss the 2% spending target.
Berlin is expected to hit 2% in 2024 - but only through a one-off fund.
Europe has been investing more since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, says Dr Claudia Major from the German Institute for International and Security Affairs.
"But if we are very honest, we know that in the moment, in a conventional conflict, Europeans are not able to defend themselves without the support of the United States," she added.
She says "so much has been done" since Zeitenwende - but still not enough to confront the full spectrum of global security challenges.
Mr Papperger agreed that Zeitenwende is "not only a word" and believes trust between government and defence contractors has improved.
Rheinmetall's share price has steadily risen since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Germany's past hangs heavy over this debate, as rearmament has led to military and morale catastrophe in the 20th Century.
While no one knows what will happen in the US election this year, Mr Trump's latest comments are being described as a wake-up call for all of Europe - although it could hardly be described as the first.
Related Topics
Europe needs a decade to build up arms stocks, says defence firm boss
- Published
2 hours ago
Related Topics
You must log in or register to see images
IMAGE SOURCE,REUTERSImage caption,
Danish PM Mette Frederiksen, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, Defence Minister Boris Pistorius and CEO of Rheinmetall Armin Papperger visited the site of the new Rheinmetall factory in Lower Saxony
By Jessica Parker
BBC Berlin correspondent
Europe will need 10 years before it is fully ready to defend itself, the boss of Germany's biggest defence firm, Rheinmetall, told the BBC.
Armin Papperger said that ammunition stocks are currently "empty".
He made the comments during a visit by Chancellor Olaf Scholz at a foundation-laying ceremony for a major new arms manufacturing plant in Lower Saxony.
Defence Minister Boris Pistorius and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen were also in attendance.
The comments come a day after comments by US presidential hopeful Donald Trump sparked fresh alarm in Europe.
The frontrunner for the Republican nomination said he once told a world leader he would not protect Nato members who don't pay their dues and would even "encourage" aggressors to "do whatever the hell they want".
Rheinmetall has said it will invest more than $300m (£274m) in the new facility. It is eventually expected to produce 200,000 rounds of artillery shells annually.
Mr Papperger said that a "long time" would be needed to prepare against an "aggressor who wants to fight against Nato".
"We are fine in three, four years - but to be really prepared, we need 10 years," he said.
"We have to produce 1.5 million rounds [of ammunition] in Europe," Mr Papperger added. He said a vast amount of Europe's ammunition was sent to Ukraine, leaving little for European stocks.
"As long as we have war, we have to help Ukraine, but later we [will] need five years at a minimum and 10 years to really fill [ammunition stocks] up," he said.
Chancellor Scholz refused to say whether he was concerned about Mr Trump's comments, saying that he was "absolutely sure" that Nato was "of essence" for the US, Canada and European countries.
"We stick to it, the President of United States sticks to it and I'm sure the American people will do so also," he went on.
But he did say that Russian President Vladimir Putin had shown "imperial ambitions" and added: "If you want peace, you have to successfully deter possible aggressors."
Asked by the BBC whether she thought that Europe needed to be ready to go at it alone if the US withdrew its support, Ms Frederiksen said Europe had to be ready "no matter what". She added that the "more and more aggressive Russia" was proof that Europe had to scale up.
"We have to speed up and that's the reason why I'm here today," she said.
It's nearly two years since Chancellor Scholz declared Zeitenwende - a turning point in Germany's foreign and defence policy - following President Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
There was widespread recognition that a "change through trade" policy with Russia had failed.
Allies had hoped that Germany, Europe's biggest economy, would take an increasingly assertive role in security and shed its traditional caution.
You must log in or register to see images
Image caption,
Dr Claudia Major says Europe would not currently be able to defend itself without the help of the United States
Yet in 2023, Germany was among a majority of Nato members who were forecast to miss the 2% spending target.
Berlin is expected to hit 2% in 2024 - but only through a one-off fund.
Europe has been investing more since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, says Dr Claudia Major from the German Institute for International and Security Affairs.
"But if we are very honest, we know that in the moment, in a conventional conflict, Europeans are not able to defend themselves without the support of the United States," she added.
She says "so much has been done" since Zeitenwende - but still not enough to confront the full spectrum of global security challenges.
Mr Papperger agreed that Zeitenwende is "not only a word" and believes trust between government and defence contractors has improved.
Rheinmetall's share price has steadily risen since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Germany's past hangs heavy over this debate, as rearmament has led to military and morale catastrophe in the 20th Century.
While no one knows what will happen in the US election this year, Mr Trump's latest comments are being described as a wake-up call for all of Europe - although it could hardly be described as the first.
Related Topics
Yeah, if you have no answer to a political point, go for ageism. Your manta is, "I may be thick but at least I'm young"
On this one it’s more scoffing at your hypocrisy. How many times have the Tories rallied round one of their own for days or weeks before finally having to admit it was wrong while you cheered for it? Starmer has made a decision in one working day.
I've not cheered poor policies and I won't vote for these Tories. Starmer's history of U turns since leading Labour has been shocking. He just doesn't believe in anything. He's weak and uninspired. I've never known a time when the US and UK have such poor political leaders.
Boris johnson would be a front runner in one of the worst political leaders ever, closely followed by Truss.
I remember that U turn from Truss but by then it was too late, adding misery and mortgage rises to millions of people. Always better to turn before rather than face the implications after. That's the sensible approach in anyone's book. The ironic thing is, Starmers U turns have not effected anybody as he's not in power but those who wouldn't be voting for him anyway get a bit carried away
Last edited:
Boris Johnson had charisma for some, but he wasn't prime ministerial material. Truss was pig headed, and I wasn't impressed by Theresa May either, who ran down the police force at a time when we were inviting the Third World into the country and crime was rising. But if you look at the number of U turns Starmer has made, it's frightening. He cannot govern like that credibly.
As long as they come before the manifesto is published, I then don't have an issue. I would if we get lied to prior to the election. We've all had a gut full of that.
Even if Labour are just 1% less corrupt then it will be progress
If you think that, you have to apply it to the rest of Europe too. Looking ahead, Starmer will have difficulty keeping the Jewish and Islamic factions happy. How long before we have religious sectarian parties in Parliament?
Don't bet on it. Remember Cash for Honours? Child sexual exploitation scandals, Rotherham etc