Better than none as you well know matewhat a crap reply, pal
Better than none as you well know matewhat a crap reply, pal
Better than none as you well know mate
I see the Yukon festival in China is underway, where they boil cats and dogs alive before eating them.
****ing savages
It's safe to say that anyone whoever supported Johnson wasn't patriotic to this country. They were following a yank who was funded by the Russians. Disgusting behaviour. They should hang their heads in shame.
I'm sure it would have. I always try to back up my nonsense, others don't bother and hope nobody noticesNone would have embarrassed you less
Many simple folk fell for it, others just obviously wanted the country damaged.I told you all years back….he was never “cuddly lovable buffoon Boris” despite what his image writers would have people believe
I see the Yukon festival in China is underway, where they boil cats and dogs alive before eating them.
****ing savages
I'm sure it would have. I always try to back up my nonsense, others don't bother and hope nobody notices
Luckily we in the west only do that to chickens.
[HASHTAG]#bekind[/HASHTAG]
You cook chickens alive, do you? Is it a custom in Staines?
****ing primitives in that part of China
You cook chickens alive, do you? Is it a custom in Staines?
****ing primitives in that part of China
How do you square that with the fact that Boris led the move to arm Ukraine against Russia?
That **** don't know what side his bread's buttered let alone what side to pick in a war - populist move at best, lucky guess probably
Feels like an expensive way of appeasing racists. Could we not just subsidise Carling?
You must log in or register to see media
A breakdown of the costs said that a third country like Rwanda would get £105,000, the Home Office £18,000, costs for flying and escorting would be £22,000, costs for detention would be £7,000 and costs to the Ministry of Justice would be £1,000.Not saying it’s a good thing or a bad thing…..but isn’t that report a bit slanted ?
Maybe I’m not reading it correctly but doesn’t the report say that while it would have a cost of £169k for each person…it would then go on to save between £106k and £165k ? Or are they saying there are two completely separate reports, with vastly different figures attached ?
Very confusing….maybe done so on purpose