Off Topic The Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should the UK remain a part of the EU or leave?

  • Stay in

    Votes: 56 47.9%
  • Get out

    Votes: 61 52.1%

  • Total voters
    117
  • Poll closed .
Many employment contracts now include clauses about not bringing the employer into disrepute

I'm not sure how widely this can be construed (ie what circumstances it would cover) and how robust it might be in an employment tribunal

I do know of one case at a former employer where someone (not me before you ask!) was paid off using a settlement agreement rather than being formally sacked

It is a very tricky area and many people forget that social media ramblings are so public

Sounds like banner boy got what was due to him though
 
Very little MSM coverage of last night's fun and games in Brixton, it seems the Police are cowed into retreating for fear of being racist and the MSM won't give airtime to anything that might have comebacks from BLM. A recipe for a summer of anarchy...

You must log in or register to see media
 
Very little MSM coverage of last night's fun and games in Brixton, it seems the Police are cowed into retreating for fear of being racist and the MSM won't give airtime to anything that might have comebacks from BLM. A recipe for a summer of anarchy...

You must log in or register to see media

Apart from The Telegraph, presumably.
 
Very little MSM coverage of last night's fun and games in Brixton, it seems the Police are cowed into retreating for fear of being racist and the MSM won't give airtime to anything that might have comebacks from BLM. A recipe for a summer of anarchy...

You must log in or register to see media

Fear not, we have Sadiq Khan who will bring law and order back to London, as fast as you can say, "Where the **** is the Mayor of London in all this?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uber_Hoop
Ok granted this is a non starter as it wouldn't happen, but hypothetically if someone flew a banner over a war memorial on veterans day saying all retirees should be remembered, then saying he'd apologise to ****ing no one after being made aware of the upset he would of caused, no laws broken, was clearly going to be emotive and upset people. What would you expect the publics reaction would be? Would people be upset if that person was sacked from their job? Would there be anyone suggesting that he's broken no laws so he shouldn't be sacked?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD
Ok granted this is a non starter as it wouldn't happen, but hypothetically if someone flew a banner over a war memorial on veterans day saying all retirees should be remembered, then saying he'd apologise to ****ing no one after being made aware of the upset he would of caused, no laws broken, was clearly going to be emotive and upset people. What would you expect the publics reaction would be? Would people be upset if that person was sacked from their job? Would there be anyone suggesting that he's broken no laws so he shouldn't be sacked?

It wouldn't be that emotive. The veterans, being generally modest types from a bye-gone era, would say, sure, let's remember all retirees.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kiwiqpr
It wouldn't be that emotive. The veterans, being generally modest types from a bye-gone era, would say, sure, let's remember all retirees.


You wouldn't think the general public would go ape ****? We will never know but I'd expect a lot of comments in the mail to call for bringing back the death penalty.
 
Ok granted this is a non starter as it wouldn't happen, but hypothetically if someone flew a banner over a war memorial on veterans day saying all retirees should be remembered, then saying he'd apologise to ****ing no one after being made aware of the upset he would of caused, no laws broken, was clearly going to be emotive and upset people. What would you expect the publics reaction would be? Would people be upset if that person was sacked from their job? Would there be anyone suggesting that he's broken no laws so he shouldn't be sacked?
Interesting example

However, I doubt that his employer would be able to sack him (at least not legally or without potentially significant compensation) as I doubt that they would be able to enforce the reputational clause (if he had one) in his contract - the key being that this wasn't aligned to discrimination legislation (wasn't racist, homophobic etc)

It is a difficult balance - where is the line drawn? The danger is that it is just used to get rid of anyone a business doesn't like rather than their being a justifiable reason (performance, gross misconduct etc)