The Official Suarez "our ****" Thread (closing this thread at noon so get commenting)

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
dear oh dear what a bunch of bottlers

clearly there are those willing to give him a year ban (international only) and those who want a one match ban <laugh>

next match is saturday. they'll have to decided today.

So (chortles) it appears that hang, draw and quarter is not an option despite the man media wishing it to be so.

Usually, a panel decides whether someone is guilty or not first before meeting up again to discuss the punishment. To me, this suggests the undecision won't be about the ban, it will be about whether or not he is guilty.
 
Usually, a panel decides whether someone is guilty or not first before meeting up again to discuss the punishment. To me, this suggests the undecision won't be about the ban, it will be about whether or not he is guilty.

For that to be right, here's the panel;

You must log in or register to see images
 
If i was a liverpool fan i would have avoides defending him, comparing irrelevant incidents and just condemned him on this occasion.

I would have realised this will just carry on and the more desperately i tried to excuse what he did based on what others have done, the more **** that gets aimed at my club.

If its **** all to do with liverpool then we all must agree, ban this vile disgusting creature from football for the good of the sport.

I wouldnt want my clubs name tarnishes again by this idiot.

Thats just me though. I support a respectable club so maybe its different?

We did condemn him initially, and you know it because you were there. The correct response of other fans then would have been to acknowledge that and let it drop.
Of course what happened was that the wums cranked it all up, wouldn't accept anything we said and accused us of defending him when we clearly weren't, and of saying things we didn't. Then Goofy goes from being a stupid twat who bites people on a football pitch to being Hitler, Stalin and Genghis Khan rolled into one and we are called disgusting and shameful because he's our player.
At this point of course, some of us bite back (pun intended) and the whole thing descends into the usual cretinous playground spectacle and any attempt at serious debate is lost.
You know we condemned him and you recognised it at the time, it's a pity you let yourself slip back into the usual routine.
 
No it isn't actually

In England, Wales and in Northern Ireland it is an offence to pay for sex with a prostitute who has been &#8220;subjected to force&#8221; and this is a strict liability offence (clients can be prosecuted even if they did not know the prostitute was forced.

<whistle>

Was she forced.. who knows :D
 
So why do we see these **** TVs programmes where coppers are sitting and waiting around to catch them? And it shows them being arrested too?

Because it's illegal to solicit i.e. offer your wares...

It's also illegal to kerb crawl.

But there's nothing illegal about paying for sex.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.