The Official Suarez "our ****" Thread (closing this thread at noon so get commenting)

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
saintanton said:
We did condemn him initially, and you know it because you were there. The correct response of other fans then would have been to acknowledge that and let it drop.
Of course what happened was that the wums cranked it all up, wouldn't accept anything we said and accused us of defending him when we clearly weren't, and of saying things we didn't. Then Goofy goes from being a stupid twat who bites people on a football pitch to being Hitler, Stalin and Genghis Khan rolled into one and we are called disgusting and shameful because he's our player.
At this point of course, some of us bite back (pun intended) and the whole thing descends into the usual cretinous playground spectacle and any attempt at serious debate is lost.
You know we condemned him and you recognised it at the time, it's a pity you let yourself slip back into the usual routine.
Click to expand...


I'd rep' you for this, but I can't. Apparently, I need to spread it around first! <doh>
 
Gerrez said:
Usually, a panel decides whether someone is guilty or not first before meeting up again to discuss the punishment. To me, this suggests the undecision won't be about the ban, it will be about whether or not he is guilty.
Click to expand...

i don't agree. I think the indecision can be either about guilt... which doesn't make snese to me given how obvious it is... or it could be about punishment.

I woudl dare suggest that different regional reps are negotiating hard to get their own benefit out of it.
 
Tobes said:
Because it's illegal to solicit i.e. offer your wares...

It's also illegal to kerb crawl.

But there's nothing illegal about paying for sex.
Click to expand...

Fair enough, you seem to know what you're talking about <whistle>
 
moreinjuredthanowen said:
i don't agree. I think the indecision can be either about guilt... which doesn't make snese to me given how obvious it is... or it could be about punishment.

I woudl dare suggest that different regional reps are negotiating hard to get their own benefit out of it.
Click to expand...

I'm going by how standard procedure for this sort of thing work. Usually, we get an announcement to say the panel have found the player guilty and that the punishment will be announced at X
 
saintanton said:
We did condemn him initially, and you know it because you were there. The correct response of other fans then would have been to acknowledge that and let it drop.
Of course what happened was that the wums cranked it all up, wouldn't accept anything we said and accused us of defending him when we clearly weren't, and of saying things we didn't. Then Goofy goes from being a stupid twat who bites people on a football pitch to being Hitler, Stalin and Genghis Khan rolled into one and we are called disgusting and shameful because he's our player.
At this point of course, some of us bite back (pun intended) and the whole thing descends into the usual cretinous playground spectacle and any attempt at serious debate is lost.
You know we condemned him and you recognised it at the time, it's a pity you let yourself slip back into the usual routine.
Click to expand...

Carlsberg don't do Posts of the Week, but if they did...


PS...rep :bandit:
 
Flappy Flanagan (JK) said:
The Uruguayan's in Brazil are getting angry with the English press hanging around and hassling them. The English press again embarrassing this nation.
Click to expand...

seen nothing yet,wait until he gets back over here.

have a horrible feeling, depending on which way you look at it i suppose, that this paves the way for a move abroad ie unbearable for me and my family type thing, as long as its a fair transfer ie preferably involving sanchez, not bothered much now.
 
jenners04 said:
seen nothing yet,wait until he gets back over here.

have a horrible feeling, depending on which way you look at it i suppose, that this paves the way for a move abroad ie unbearable for me and my family type thing, as long as its a fair transfer ie preferably involving sanchez, not bothered much now.
Click to expand...


This^ As long as the move involves Sanchez and decent money to buy players (e.g. Shaquiri and Moreno, hopefully), I wouldn't be too bothered, although he's an immense player.

I can see him in the barca kit, too. Just imagine him and Neymar and Messi as a front three! Barca would have an even more enviable strikeforce. <yikes> If I was a defender seeing those players attacking me I'd sh*t myself ... and put on shoulder pads!
 
CCC said:
This^ As long as the move involves Sanchez and decent money to buy players (e.g. Shaquiri and Moreno, hopefully), I wouldn't be too bothered, although he's an immense player.

I can see him in the barca kit, too. Just imagine him and Neymar and Messi as a front three! Barca would have an even more enviable strikeforce. <yikes> If I was a defender seeing those players attacking me I'd sh*t myself ... and put on shoulder pads!
Click to expand...

FFS...<doh>
 
Rainbow Jeremy said:
Quick question, can the FA ban him as well as FIFA for the bite incident? Or is it none if their concern?
Click to expand...

not sure how they could, when fa banned him fifa didn't get involved then and say well we think you deserve an int ban as well, and they have a lot more powers than fa do.

although it's the fa so anything is possible, but not sure how it would be legal.
 
Rainbow Jeremy said:
Quick question, can the FA ban him as well as FIFA for the bite incident? Or is it none if their concern?
Click to expand...

Simple answer is no.

Long explanation ...Fifa are the organisers of the world cup therefore the arbitrators too. The F.A. in this case are merely participants in FIFA's party and have no jurisdiction.


If you get pissed up in Marbella and spend a night in the cells are the english police entitled to arrest you on your return to England and lock you up for a night because you were drunk and disorderly 1000 miles away last week ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back