The Official Suarez "our ****" Thread (closing this thread at noon so get commenting)

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe so.

What happens when every footballer on earth takes a restraining order out on suarez though? Cant say they dont have grounds seeing as hea a danger to life

Suarez was a prick and a fool to bite the eyetie but you taking the moral high ground is funny UIR when Utd are steeped in controversy and not a word of condemnation from you about any of it.<laugh>
 
Theres a lot of wishful thinking here...

From liverpool fans. Have a read back through. It startes so well. Shame.
 
Suarez was a prick and a fool to bite the eyetie but you taking the moral high ground is funny UIR when Utd are steeped in controversy and not a word of condemnation from you about any of it.<laugh>

Which of it happened at this world cup and which of our players has 2 previous lengthy bans for the same thing as well as 2 other unsavoury incidents since 2010?

Name that player and i will condemn him.
 
Theres a lot of wishful thinking here...

From liverpool fans. Have a read back through. It startes so well. Shame.[/QUOTE

As regards to unprecedented domestic bans based upon as yet unwritten rules and punishments laid down by FIFA.
 
Which of it happened at this world cup and which of our players has 2 previous lengthy bans for the same thing as well as 2 other unsavoury incidents since 2010?

Name that player and i will condemn him.

Why 2010 and why this World Cup?

This is the Liverpool board y/n?

The incident isn't club related y/n?

There is a World Cup forum on the site y/n?

If our club are fair game so is the club who's previous owner got got watching women using a public toilet.<whistle>
 
Why 2010 and why this World Cup?

This is the Liverpool board y/n?

The incident isn't club related y/n?

There is a World Cup forum on the site y/n?

If our club are fair game so is the club who's previous owner got got watching women using a public toilet.<whistle>

Previous owner. So nothing on the pitch? Unless he was a player/owner.... He wasnt was he page....

So you had nothing and resortes to such a poor attempt? Not good.

I think you know why suarez is being discussed here on the liverpool board. Everyone else seems to get it. Have you just got up page?
 
Previous owner. So nothing on the pitch? Unless he was a player/owner.... He wasnt was he page....

So you had nothing and resortes to such a poor attempt? Not good.

I think you know why suarez is being discussed here on the liverpool board. Everyone else seems to get it. Have you just got up page?

He was your owner when he got caught pulling the head off it looking through his little pervy hole in the women's toilet.:bandit:
 
So it's a big "small cat" instead of a small "big cat"?

Yay, biology derail! <diva> No, I misremembered. The Jaguar is a 'big cat'. It's not a true biological classification but its separates them on the ability to roar. Cheetahs, Cougars and Snow Leopards can't so they, despite their large-ish size, are classed as 'small cats'. <ok>

Yes, I knew that. Jaguars are magnificent creatures, and you can only speculate who'd come off best in a fight with a tiger or a lion (although there was a programme on Discovery saying that a lion would beat a tiger because of its mane - the jag would surely just crush its f**king skull!). Knew that about Hyenas too - even lions give them a wide berth. They can apparently crush the bones of even buffalos to get the marrow out of them - after the lions have caught and killed them in the first place though!


The crushing canine teeth of bone-crushing animals such as Hyenas and Jaguars inform on the predicted ecological niche for the T-Rex, due to dental similarities. Other therapod (t-rex / allosaur-like) dinosaurs had thinner more lizard-esque teeth, more like land-sharks than big cats or members of the dog family. In fact Palaeontologists predicted they'd be more like Spotted Hyenas*, who are mostly predators but can also scavenge in times of hardship.


*Other types of Hyenas are more adapted for scavenging food than actively hunting prey, but they do do it, too, just less so than the Spotted Hyena.
 
Interestingly, Jaguars have arguably the strongest bite of any mammal*. Unlike the rest of the 'big cats'** -- which kill using a bite to neck / face (suffocation) -- Jaguars crush the skulls of their prey. They obliterate the skulls of the crocodilians they find, pierce their canines through the heavy temporal skull bones of Tapirs, and even crack open large turtle shells. Indeed, the word 'Jaguar' is derived from the Native American word 'yaguar', which translates approximately as, 'he who kills with one leap'.

In short, a Jaguar bite is rarely non-fatal.

Here endeth CCC's National Geographic testification.

*Although perhaps the Spotted Hyena might pip the Jaguar for bite force.
**The Jaguar isn't classified with the 'big cats' despite being similar in size to, but much stockier than, the Leopard.

Did you get this from the "CIA World Book of Big Fibs"?
Last I heard the Jaguar was a big cat. One of four members of the Panthera genus, the others being Lion, Tiger and Leopard.
The term "Big Cat" is informal, not a strict biological one, nevertheless all four are species belonging to the same genus.

Still, I reckon Suarez would deck any of 'em.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.