John Terry apparently will only sign a contract extension for villa if he has a clause that says he won't play against Chelsea... “I genuinely hope he [Terry] triggers it,” said Bruce. “All those phone calls to him last summer, he hasn’t been disappointed with it. From the training ground, to the stadium, to the support, it has all the makings of a big club. “I’m sure he will give it a good go if we get promoted and enjoy the challenge of it. We’ll not pick him against Chelsea if that’s he wants." Both fat ****ing Bruce and Terry need to get a bastard grip, what a complete and utter piss take. I didn't think I could dislike either of them any more than I already did but this is a whole new level of ****itude.
I wouldn't want to play against city. Its fair enough. Would he want to stop Chelsea getting a title, no so he's a ****, although he is still a huge arrogant ****.
He’s a professional footballer being paid to play for Villa and if picked to play that’s what he should ****ing well do. The egotistical **** should not be dictating who he will and who he won’t play against. I hate football.
If City were (just go with me here) in a position where a win would win them the PL, and I played for the opposition, as much as I would want City to beat us, I would still play and try to win for my team. He's a ****, pure and simple.
Thought this was gonna be some clause whereby he gets to be in the photo should Lpool win the CL or summat
If he likes his former club that much he should **** off back there. Oh hang on a minute they didn't want him did they?
It sickens me that a 'look at me' article is actually on the same page as a brilliant article about an honourable, self-effacing and true club captain, Ian Ashbee. Terry besmirches the armband ....... the complete and utter **** him.
When reading the title of the thread , I thought the 'John Terry clause' would be all about including shagging your team mate's wife/girlfriend. Get the ****er in jail and do Cahill for ABH. Set of wide boy ****s.
Steve Bruce is equal parts bellend, as if we didn't know that already, just for being happily complicit with such monstrously ****ish behaviour. Then he'll become an even bigger **** when he goes back on his stupid word and moans about not having Terry available after they lose to Chelsea.
We agreed something similar as part of Fryatt's transfer didn't we? That Leicester wouldn't agree the deal before January 1st when we were due to play them?