The FFP thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
FFP thread for Syd and Orange needed:emoticon-0150-hands

Nah I'm done. <laugh> I can't keep saying the same thing and not having it register.

I've shot a tweet to the Price of Football because I want to see if there's an ep where they go over Championship FFP rules and explain it well because then I can just post that for anyone who wants to understand it and that's that.
 
Nah I'm done. <laugh> I can't keep saying the same thing and not having it register.

I've shot a tweet to the Price of Football because I want to see if there's an ep where they go over Championship FFP rules and explain it well because then I can just post that for anyone who wants to understand it and that's that.

I understand the nuts and bolts of it, just am sure it's currently a consideration, but don't know what part applies to us at the moment, or whether it's just the club being cautious they don't shaft themselves in future years.
 
Nah I'm done. <laugh> I can't keep saying the same thing and not having it register.

I've shot a tweet to the Price of Football because I want to see if there's an ep where they go over Championship FFP rules and explain it well because then I can just post that for anyone who wants to understand it and that's that.
I’m aiming to do my masters in it, keep the board going a few more years admins!
 
Ali - four year deal = 0.625m this year
Tufan - three year deal = 1.33m this year
Sinik - three year deal = 1.2m this year
= 3.16m this year

And that's 3.2m spent, not loss incurred. Two very different things.

If we're also playing this game, we'll be owed more income on the Bowen transfer due to clauses being triggered now he's played for England and scored a certain number of goals. These clauses wouldn't be recognised as income initially as they were conditional.

I think someone who would know said we've had the vast majority of bowen cash already.
 
Admin
Can we please have a FFP Thread ?
I keep thinking we have transfer updates on this thread

Probably makes sense.

Lot of stuff on here or in new owners thread would be better in one dedicated to keep an eye on finances.

Pretty sure HITC Sevens has something coming up that is bound to generate discussion also.
 
What's your take?
I can see both your points to be fair. Think you 2 agree more then you perceive neither of you wants to admit it. It has been mentioned a lot more at this stage then I thought it would which is odd so their must be something there although I was of the viewpoint of Syd that it wouldn’t matter at this stage.
 
I can see both your points to be fair. Think you 2 agree more then you perceive neither of you wants to admit it. It has been mentioned a lot more at this stage then I thought it would which is odd so their must be something there although I was of the viewpoint of Syd that it wouldn’t matter at this stage.

It would make more sense if they were just being diligent not to overcommit in future years.

If the guaranteed element of the KLP fee goes on this years FFP balance sheet which is then offset against ammmortised fees for the incomings - we shouldn't be close to breech in the current year. I accept that.

Unless it's something to do with that short term loan Toastie was on about the other day.

But if so and there are expenditure issues then why are we still going for Nwakaeme and others if it puts us at risk of a breech?

We can't count the KLP fee twice, we can't sell him again and there isn't a great saving or profit to be made by flogging existing players, except Greaves perhaps but they don't seem to be doing that.

Not a saving or fee which will cover a Nwakaeme's contract for the next 2 years anyway. And if money was that tight, wouldn't we bail on the Traore deal as opposed to continue chasing big wage players from Super Lig? ?
 
Last edited:
No offence, lads, but can you shelve this FFP conversation or move it to another thread? It’s gone on for page after page now and it’s boring as ****.
 
That makes no sense. You book the receivable when the transfer is made and recognise revenue. It's no different to any purchase made on credit.

When a player is sold you write off any book value (for klp, that's nil) and recognise all revenue. You then book that against a receivable, and then recognise the amount of cash received against that receivable.

You don't recognise revenue in the following years.

Syd your wrong. Receivables are only booked into the individual years accounts that they become due if the inbound transfer fee is payable over a number of years. It's called annual amortisation. You might record an asset value (players worth) on acquisition immediately within your balance sheet, to be potentially written down in financial terms over the term of the players contract, but your notion would completely undermine any cash flow modelling.
 
Syd your wrong. Receivables are only booked into the individual years accounts that they become due if the inbound transfer fee is payable over a number of years. It's called annual amortisation. You might record an asset value (players worth) on acquisition immediately within your balance sheet, to be potentially written down in financial terms over the term of the players contract, but your notion would completely undermine any cash flow modelling.

I think you're misunderstanding what I'm saying mate, it's not that the receivable is all booked in the year it is recognised, it's the income.

Income is recorded when the service is performed or the goods are exchanged. When we sold Bowen in 2020 we would have booked his transfer fee as revenue received then and there, regardless of when the cash was received.

The discussion was regarding FFP and the calculation of our profit/loss. For any such calculation, KLP's fee would be recognised as having been received within this year, as we have sold the player to Brentford. If a business sells someone a TV or any good on credit, they don't recognise revenue for that product for the x number of years it takes for that person to pay it off. They book the revenue when the product is sold, and then write off the receivable as the cash is received.
 
No. Losses can only be stood up to 5m if the owner doesn't agree to provide equity to cover the losses in a given assessment period.

Basically we are allowed to lose average 13m a year in a rolling 3 if the owner covers those losses.

Otherwise we can only lose 5m a year average over a rolling 3.

Maybe it is something to do with this which is causing the problem?

I doubt it isn't surmountable though.

I can't imagine the club don't know the rules and they're still in the market doing deals.

The £13 million only applies if the owner or someone else agrees to buy more equity in the club. Acun has to cover the losses with shares he buys or someone else buys. Agreeing to lend the company money to cover losses isn't permitted. If Acun is willing to buy £35 million worth of shares in City we can lose that amount over the next three years. If he doesn't buy or sell more shares our annual losses will have to be more modest. No wonder we're having meetings over ffp.
 
I think you're misunderstanding what I'm saying mate, it's not that the receivable is all booked in the year it is recognised, it's the income.

Income is recorded when the service is performed or the goods are exchanged. When we sold Bowen in 2020 we would have booked his transfer fee as revenue received then and there, regardless of when the cash was received.

The discussion was regarding FFP and the calculation of our profit/loss. For any such calculation, KLP's fee would be recognised as having been received within this year, as we have sold the player to Brentford. If a business sells someone a TV or any good on credit, they don't recognise revenue for that product for the x number of years it takes for that person to pay it off. They book the revenue when the product is sold, and then write off the receivable as the cash is received.
Unless it was due to be paid over in a period greater than 3 years, it would be irrelevant anyway,
wouldn't it?. Any add-ons for Bowen would be additional income in the period it was triggered though I'd have though.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SydneyTiger14