It helps they’re all established brands. Man City were being sponsored by newly set up businessesMaybe just me being a cynic but after the revelations about Man City, I just hope all our income streams, sponsorship deals etc. are 100% by the book.
It helps they’re all established brands. Man City were being sponsored by newly set up businessesMaybe just me being a cynic but after the revelations about Man City, I just hope all our income streams, sponsorship deals etc. are 100% by the book.
It helps they’re all established brands. Man City were being sponsored by newly set up businesses
I hate how FFP. Does for some teams & not for others, Real Madrid & Barcelona have been bailed out by their government for years, with nothing ever coming of it. Barcelona have sold off a percentage of future TV revenue & have spent that, yet in a few years they should be skint, somehow, miraculously, they won’t be & will be spending millions to get the EPL superstar who has “always dreamed” of playing for Barcelona.
For me, I’d rather have owners shovelling their own money into a club, no matter how much, as long as they don’t go bust, or end up owing other clubs. That’s what was wrong before, clubs going out of business because they didn’t have the money they were spending, now all these super rich owners aren’t able to spend their billions & buy the league.
The government bails out their debts which is distinct from FFP which tracks their losses in a season.
Nothing to do with FFP, but state funding of football clubs is illegal and lots of Spanish clubs did it regardless.
I find it hard to believe state funding is illegal, are you sure it isn't just illegal in the PL? Real Madrid have always been government owned/funded haven't they? PSG another are quite clearly owned by the Qatari government. I get that some forms of government funding may be illegal but didn't think it was full stop.
It is illegal, seven clubs in Spain were prosecuted for it and were made to repay all the money. Real Madrid are owned by its members.
Do you mean state ownership or state funding?
Those clubs were prosecuted for having favourable tax rates and other illegal matters. The government of various countries fund clubs in a variety of ways.
It is against EU law for clubs to receive any sort of funding from the state, be it tax breaks, loans, cheap land, or anything else that gives them an unfair advantage against other clubs. A foreign state forming a company that then buys a club is not illegal, as has happened with PSG, Man City, Newcastle etc.
As I read it, the issue is in the state "funding" some clubs over others, particularly if it involves interpretation of tax rules that aren't applied across the board, rather than it being outright illegal for a state to fund football clubs in general.
It is against EU law for clubs to receive any sort of funding from the state, be it tax breaks, loans, cheap land, or anything else that gives them an unfair advantage against other clubs. A foreign state forming a company that then buys a club is not illegal, as has happened with PSG, Man City, Newcastle etc.
Nice to see the return of the FFS thread.
The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
Seemed quite a relevant post for a relevant thread. You could try it sometime.
It is illegal, seven clubs in Spain were prosecuted for it and were made to repay all the money. Real Madrid are owned by its members.