The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
DMD said:
You are in deed and as usual, wriggling and derailing in your usual tedious 'style'. I've posted the quotes and a link to the context in the reply to t'other dim dull ****. You can put them with the pictures that show that it was more of a liberal era than was claimed. The rest is just you squirming. :emoticon-0105-wink:
Click to expand...
Bodinki never mentioned the Victorian era :1980_boogie_down:
 
And here we go on the Dull merry go round <laugh>

The Victorians were in no way accepting of homosexuality, ffs! Wilde got 2 years hard Labour for a consensual homosexual relationship.

How in any context is that accepting? Unless you mean, of course, that 50 years earlier they would have hung him?..
 
Tobes said:
Yet more bullshit and waffle to deflect away from your latest humiliation, which was borne from your desire to be a clever ****

The pictures prove **** all, the court sentences prove plenty, you absolute cock womble
Click to expand...

The Court sentences do in deed prove plenty. Unfortunately for you, they, and the associated legal system support what I said in the reply in question.

You're making a tedious arse of yourself over a none issue you're trying to build into something else again. :emoticon-0105-wink:
 
DMD said:
The Court sentences do in deed prove plenty. Unfortunately for you, they, and the associated legal system support what I said in the reply in question.

You're making a tedious arse of yourself over a none issue you're trying to build into something else again. :emoticon-0105-wink:
Click to expand...
@Bodinki did you mention the Victorian era or homosexuality? Dull is convinced you posted an inaccurate comment on the Victorians' attitude to homosexuality.

:emoticon-0102-bigsm
 
DMD said:
Deceive what exactly? <doh>

Despite your usual piss poor,desperate attempts to rejig the issue, the simple fact still remains that the post I was responding to wasn't strictly accurate. :emoticon-0105-wink:


You must log in or register to see images
Click to expand...
Is that supposed to be a picture that's evidence of Victorian England having an enlightened attitude to homosexuals?
It's Delina Rossa, a bearded lady from Paris, who appears to have lived in America as a sideshow freak.
Not sure how that helps you, to be honest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes
NowsufferinginSpain said:
And here we go on the Dull merry go round <laugh>

The Victorians were in no way accepting of homosexuality, ffs! Wilde got 2 years hard Labour for a consensual homosexual relationship.

How in any context is that accepting? Unless you mean, of course, that 50 years earlier they would have hung him?..
Click to expand...

Wilde did, not long after the law changed and for reasons beyond just homosexuality, so it's hardly an apt example. Plenty didn't.

It's your buddies trying to spin this away from the point being made in the reply, which despite the claims wasn't focused on homosexuality.

Where the victorians liberal in their attitude to drugs?
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
Is that supposed to be a picture that's evidence of Victorian England having an enlightened attitude to homosexuals?
It's Delina Rossa, a bearded lady from Paris, who appears to have lived in America as a sideshow freak.
Not sure how that helps you, to be honest.
Click to expand...
Ouch. Dull getting gangbanged this evening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes
Stan said:
@Bodinki did you mention the Victorian era or homosexuality? Dull is convinced you posted an inaccurate comment on the Victorians' attitude to homosexuality.

:emoticon-0102-bigsm
Click to expand...
No I believe I said that attitudes in Britain had become more liberal in the last 200 years.
Don't think I mentioned homosexuality, not in that post, and I definitely didnt mention Victorians, specifically, although 200 years ago would put it NEARLY in that era, but not quite
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
Is that supposed to be a picture that's evidence of Victorian England having an enlightened attitude to homosexuals?
It's Delina Rossa, a bearded lady from Paris, who appears to have lived in America as a sideshow freak.
Not sure how that helps you, to be honest.
Click to expand...

Nope. You're failing into tedious tobes and t'other dullards side show trap. :emoticon-0105-wink:
 
Bodinki said:
No I believe I said that attitudes in Britain had become more liberal in the last 200 years.
Don't think I mentioned homosexuality, not in that post, and I definitely didnt mention Victorians
Click to expand...

Were you implying that values have got progressively more liberal, which is what your post implies?
 
Bodinki said:
No I believe I said that attitudes in Britain had become more liberal in the last 200 years.
Don't think I mentioned homosexuality, not in that post, and I definitely didnt mention Victorians, specifically, although 200 years ago would put it NEARLY in that era, but not quite
Click to expand...
In that era when homosexuality was illegal?
 
DMD said:
Were you implying that values have got progressively more liberal, which is what your post implies?
Click to expand...
Yes, I didnt specifically mention drugs or homosexuality specifically, although those ARE the sorts of things I was referring to.
But also religion, sex in general, marriage, the issue of race and gender identity etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back