I suppose he'd argue he does it in other ways than sitting in the Parliament.
The EU debate - Part III
- Thread starter Jürgenmeiʃter
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
I suppose he'd argue he does it in other ways than sitting in the Parliament.
If it stops you whining on and ignoring the previous answers, based on your informed explanation I'd say she's just a slightly more left wing version of the EU, so on those grounds I'd say no, I wouldn't support her.
By publicity seeking with his mate Donald and Russia Today, apparently!
Clearly a good use of taxpayers' time and money.
By publicity seeking with his mate Donald and Russia Today, apparently!
Clearly a good use of taxpayers' time and money.
I do find his position quite odd but I can't knock the bloke. He's achieved a lot more, for himself in terms of pure cash and influence and politically than if he'd just been a backbench Tory.
By publicity seeking with his mate Donald and Russia Today, apparently!
Clearly a good use of taxpayers' time and money.
It's interesting that when the EU fund schemes, it's EU money, but when they pay MP's, it's taxpayers money.
It's all our money that they spend undemocratically.
He's achieved power and influence by backing the aims of the powerful and influential.
He's done it while failing to do a job that's he's paid well to do.
He's a ****house.
I can contribute to voting people out of our parliament, and there are ways of influencing decisions. Those ways have been ignored to a degree prior to brexit, but the referendum vote has been a bit of a democratic wake up call.
The EU is less democratic than parliament.
Baseless claims are in deed baseless.
The MEP's have to compete against other MEP's of many hues, in a system of unclear political leaning and unchangeable policies before our national and local level issues can be addressed.
To compare that to the national parliament is in deed baseless.
It should be a trading group, not the bureaucratic mess it is.
I thought Castro died years ago to be honest.
He'll always be remembered for being slightly to the right of Le Pen.
He'll always be remembered for being slightly to the right of Le Pen.
Like the immigration and border control issues, it depends where you draw the borders. Having Hungary and others veto changes to our social security system as an example, is hardly democratic for UK citizens.
Earlier this year. It's a part of what the referendum was supposed to have been a lever to get UK interests through the EU 'democracy'.
Changes to our benefits system, even if it just brought them in line with other EU states, is one way of reducing the border control argument, as people would be less attracted to this damp soggy island if being self supported was a requirement. It would mean we'd naturally get more that could contribute.
- Status