The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Tobes said:
No fan of the far right <laugh>

That'll be why you're a UKIP voting, Trump supporting, racism denying, Muslim goading, Breitbart quoting, dickhead.

The 'waving' comment was a massive faux pas, as if a Nazi salute - given EVERYTHING - that stands for, is any different from some Muslim extemeists spouting their hate filled bile. They're 2 sides of the same coin, your comment spoke volumes and you're fooling no-one
Click to expand...

Given I'm not racist, and despite being challenged to, nobody has found anything I've posted as racist, you have no idea who I vote for, I opposed Clinton rather than supporting Trump, and quote many sources, possibly the least of which is Breitbart, which you seem to know more about than me, it sets the degree of accuracy in your posts. You screeching ****er. <doh>

No faux pas with the waving. At least his hand didn't have a head in it.

You apologising for the current terrorist bullshit and trying to say it's on the same level of muslamic ray gun man and the guy from Barnsley points at things you should be ashamed and embarrassed about. You defend the murdering ****es.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Born again Humanitarian
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
Given I'm not racist, and despite being challenged to, nobody has found anything I've posted as racist, you have no idea who I vote for, I opposed Clinton rather than supporting Trump, and quote many sources, possibly the least of which is Breitbart, which you seem to know more about than me, it sets the degree of accuracy in your posts. You screeching ****er. <doh>

No faux pas with the waving. At least his hand didn't have a head in it.

You apologising for the current terrorist bullshit and trying to say it's on the same level of muslamic ray gun man and the guy from Barnsley points at things you should be ashamed and embarrassed about. You defend the murdering ****es.
Click to expand...
Where did I apologise for Islamic terrorists?

You stupid Islamophobic ****
 
Treble said:
This is where your argument breaks down I take it? You do this a lot. Are you trying to get a rise out of me because you can't reply with a coherent answer?

Btw your earlier comment was patently untrue. You know, as well as I do, that any "guy proposing death and oppression to non-muslims, gays, women" would be breaking the law and therefore subject to prosecution. It's pure sensationalist hyperbole on your part.
Click to expand...

Except he did it for 20 years, as did his followers and apart from a few exceptions, did so with impunity. He wasn't charged for doing exactly what you say is illegal on that clip I just posted. <doh>
 
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
Perhaps if the moderate muslims, lefties and dickheads in the media **** people like that off in the same way they **** off and ridicule other extremists, rather than defending their rights over the rights of others to call bollocks on his hatred, others would see that sort of thing for what it is, and we could all crack on.
Click to expand...
Moderate Muslims and lefties? You posted an interview of him on Fox News.
They spoke to him quite a bit. Breitbart did, too:
http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/...t-practicing-gays-to-death-wherever-they-are/

People don't have an issue with arseholes like him being criticised.
Most don't even care if you criticise Islam, though there are a few that object.
The problem is when you generalise and apply it to Muslims as a whole, rather than the religion.
 
Treble said:
It's such an immature response by him. He does this when he finds himself in a corner and surrounded by facts.
Click to expand...
He is unbelievably tedious. His entire life seems to be devoted to composing long, factually dubious, right wing posts on here.
 
Treble said:
This is where your argument breaks down I take it? You do this a lot. Are you trying to get a rise out of me because you can't reply with a coherent answer?

Btw your earlier comment was patently untrue. You know, as well as I do, that any "guy proposing death and oppression to non-muslims, gays, women" would be breaking the law and therefore subject to prosecution. It's pure sensationalist hyperbole on your part.
Click to expand...
I don't think that he actually did those things explicitly, though.
He was generally smart enough to avoid making that mistake.
Calling for the death penalty for something isn't illegal.
 
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
Except he did it for 20 years, as did his followers and apart from a few exceptions, did so with impunity. He wasn't charged for doing exactly what you say is illegal on that clip I just posted. <doh>
Click to expand...

Instead of diversion, go back to the previous post that you brushed aside by falsely claiming I was an apologist for Choudhary, and actually respond to the original point. I've posted two paragraphs there and I'm interested to see if you can break it down? Can you do that?
 
petersaxton said:
Maybe we need to divert some foreign aid for his educational needs!?
Click to expand...
Maybe we need to divert some foreign aid to helping fund the housing benefit that you're taking from your HMO slum and your hull terrace

Oh and btw £1m for the pair? <laugh> you better let Zoopla know they've undervalued your prime asset by about 45% you deluded melt
 
  • Like
Reactions: Page_Moss_Kopite
Treble said:
Instead of diversion, go back to the previous post that you brushed aside by falsely claiming I was an apologist for Choudhary, and actually respond to the original point. I've posted two paragraphs there and I'm interested to see if you can break it down? Can you do that?
Click to expand...

There's no diversion. You're trying to avoid condemning him and his ilk out hand. There is no excuse or justification that make his words or views acceptable.
 
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
A terrorist apologist ****er like you is probably thick and desperate enough to think being anti hate is anti Islamic.
Click to expand...
You've already shown your views on Islam on the other thread you bogus, spineless, ****e

A typical Hull ****, a 2 faced ****ehawk who hasn't got the bollocks to say what he really thinks, just hides behind intimation and suggestion. You gold plated ****
 
BobbyD said:
Not necessarily talking about the emails more about her intimadation of women, the people who seem to be dying around her, wikileaks publishing she uses her charity as her own personal piggy bank (like paying for chelseas wedding). Theres nothing cast iron in any of the above which she will be prosecuted for but in my eyes i have down as guilty.

That's not to say you can't believe (whoever you were arguing about) he is guilty, if the circumstantial evidence shows he is guilty. Just that you were discrediting the above with bodanki because there wasn't 100% irrefutable proof of the above yet you are doing the same thing with this bloke
Click to expand...


A load of made up **** that you choose to believe for no good reason, then?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back