The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
I've been trying to follow your diversions in the hope you finally get to a point. Seemingly you were hunting around trying to find something else to be outraged at to divert the topic and hope it looked like someone else doing it.
Have you noticed that you accuse absolutely everyone that disagrees with you of deflecting and diverting?
Yet you never address anything that's posted in reply to you, choosing to deflect and divert, instead.
Are you utterly lacking in self-awareness or just a massive hypocrite?
 
Who the **** compared Soros to the KKK? <doh>
You did:
So some on here reject the democratically elected red candidate, partly because an extremist group, the KKK, created by the democrats to help keep black people down, said they endorse him, yet he described that as repulsive.

They support the blue candidate, even though they're endorsed and funded by a wealthy close friend, with a self confessed God complex, who believes normal rules don't apply to them, and has a history of creating civil unrest and funding groups aimed at undemocratic civil unrest. To add to the CV, he's an unrepentant nazi collaborator who stripped jews of their possessions, and has several international arrest warrants out on him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PleaseNotPoll
Have you noticed that you accuse absolutely everyone that disagrees with you of deflecting and diverting?
Yet you never address anything that's posted in reply to you, choosing to deflect and divert, instead.
Are you utterly lacking in self-awareness or just a massive hypocrite?

Styill no comment on the topic I see. Hey ho.

I look forward to you being outraged at allegations of racism and xenophobia, I'll even add bigotry, although quite a few seem to misuse it. I assume you'll be squealing for proof. After all, you're really not a hypocrite, are you?
 
Styill no comment on the topic I see. Hey ho.

I look forward to you being outraged at allegations of racism and xenophobia, I'll even add bigotry, although quite a few seem to misuse it. I assume you'll be squealing for proof. After all, you're really not a hypocrite, are you?
I've pointed out why I'm not going to address any topics with you.
You diverted, deflected and avoided from that comment too, demonstrating my point clearly.

What allegations of racism, xenophobia and bigotry am I supposed to be outraged at?
 
Soroshelps Black Lives Matters which is diverting attention away from this serious problem.

Utter bullshit!....<ok>


Only if you believe lives don't matter. There are a fair few blacks saying what I said there, that black on black gun crime is a far bigger issue than the perceived issue with the Police, and the focus and funding of Black Lives Matters (by?) is detrimental to the bigger issue.
 
I've pointed out why I'm not going to address any topics with you.
You diverted, deflected and avoided from that comment too, demonstrating my point clearly.

What allegations of racism, xenophobia and bigotry am I supposed to be outraged at?

It doesn't surprise me. You've spent all day avoiding it with deflections and diversions.

Now it's back to the original topic, you hunt your safespace.
 
Nope. Read it again, that's not comparing the KKK to Soros, it's pointing out the hypocrisy of linking Trump to a group he described as repulsive.
I'm perfectly happy to believe that Trump finds the KKK repulsive. Hey, he says it, so it must be true. But I'm also entitled to judge that a politician who is supported by such a group is probably on the wrong track.
You are the one who is being hypocritical. You judge her by rumours and call her crooked when you should just believe she is truthful as you do Trump.
 
You've literally avoided everything that I've said with this comment.
You can't answer a single question.

I've patiently replied to your wriggles and diversions away from the actual topic, which was the hypocrisy of some on here, which you've helped highlight, and the funding of groups who end up at the protests.
 
Some of you need to start being more honest with yourselves when it comes to stuff like this. It's clear what the point he's trying to make is. It's to your own shame that you will drag discussion through the mud like this because you're all so desperate to score little technicality points over anyone that doesn't fall in line.
It was anything but clear and still isn't. He is prepared to believe any old guff the far right put out and then accuses those of us who can see the actual facts of hypocrisy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PleaseNotPoll
I'm perfectly happy to believe that Trump finds the KKK repulsive. Hey, he says it, so it must be true. But I'm also entitled to judge that a politician who is supported by such a group is probably on the wrong track.
You are the one who is being hypocritical. You judge her by rumours and call her crooked when you should just believe she is truthful as you do Trump.
Agreed, and there is the hypocrisy
 
  • Like
Reactions: PleaseNotPoll
I've patiently replied to your wriggles and diversions away from the actual topic, which was the hypocrisy of some on here, which you've helped highlight, and the funding of groups who end up at the protests.
You haven't answered anything. You've refused to do so, by your own admission.

When I pointed out the falsehoods in your initial claim on this you completely ignored them and went off on a tangent.
Why would anyone attempt to discuss anything with someone that acts like that constantly?
They'll never get anywhere, so why bother?
Try actually answering that question.
 
I'm perfectly happy to believe that Trump finds the KKK repulsive. Hey, he says it, so it must be true. But I'm also entitled to judge that a politician who is supported by such a group is probably on the wrong track.
You are the one who is being hypocritical. You judge her by rumours and call her crooked when you should just believe she is truthful as you do Trump.

Which of Trumps actual policies are attractive to that minority group?
 
You haven't answered anything. You've refused to do so, by your own admission.

When I pointed out the falsehoods in your initial claim on this you completely ignored them and went off on a tangent.
Why would anyone attempt to discuss anything with someone that acts like that constantly?
They'll never get anywhere, so why bother?
Try actually answering that question.


As you've repeatedly avoided the actual discussion, your words fit you far better. <ok>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.