The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
God's Cock said:
....says the kid fiddler. Ballet classes with 'stanette' my arse.

Today I am saying that I have just started college. That'll either **** you in the head or you will simply continue to repeat whatever suits your silly games.

Takes yer pick kiddy fiddler :)
Click to expand...
Nice to know you're tracking all of my posts. Not that you're bothered <laugh>
 
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
Nope, no siree, I'll just agree with you to shift you off this point. <ok>

So, the funding trail, which was where I started...any ideas who funds the key groups in the protests that seem to habitually become riots?
Click to expand...
So when you get proved to be utterly wrong, you pretend that you're still right anyway?
Then you try to deflect from the subject, while blaming me for deflection? Er, no.
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
So when you get proved to be utterly wrong, you pretend that you're still right anyway?
Then you try to deflect from the subject, while blaming me for deflection? Er, no.
Click to expand...

I don't agree you've proved me wrong, but I'll say you're right because I'm humouring you as I don't believe it's anything worth arguing. It's just your deflection. <ok>

Erm, by the way, the funding was the subject you've been deflecting from. <doh>
 
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
I don't agree you've proved me wrong, but I'll say you're right because I'm humouring you as I don't believe it's anything worth arguing. It's just your deflection.
Click to expand...
You've been banging on about if for post after post and you still can't admit that you're wrong or support your claims.
He was 14 at the time. What is it that you think he did that still merits you calling him a Nazi?

Every time that anyone actually discusses anything with you, you attempt to avoid the subject and move onto something else.
You bring something up. It's shown to be wrong. You say that it's irrelevant, refuse to admit fault and tangent off.
It's extremely disingenuous.

Deflect. Play the victim. Insult. Repeat.
Boring.
Why would anyone want to address anything that you bring up, when you maintain this dishonest charade?
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
You've been banging on about if for post after post and you still can't admit that you're wrong or support your claims.
He was 14 at the time. What is it that you think he did that still merits you calling him a Nazi?

Every time that anyone actually discusses anything with you, you attempt to avoid the subject and move onto something else.
You bring something up. It's shown to be wrong. You say that it's irrelevant, refuse to admit fault and tangent off.
It's extremely disingenuous.

Deflect. Play the victim. Insult. Repeat.
Boring.
Why would anyone want to address anything that you bring up, when you maintain this dishonest charade?
Click to expand...

Marvellous, you're 100% right on that. <ok> Feel good?

So, back to where it started before your many deflections, this funding of the key groups in the protests the seem to habitually turn into riots?
 
NowsufferinginSpain said:
It wasn't meant to be, as I'm sure even your limited mind must realise.

It was a commentary on how your behaviour very predictably follows the exact same patten, without fail.
Click to expand...

Fascinating, please share more of your obviously in depth understanding of the EU. <ok>
 
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
Marvellous, you're 100% right on that. <ok> Feel good?
Click to expand...
Nope. You're not doing it again.
You're merely attempting to dishonestly preach your bullshit to people on here and run from any actual discussion.
Any time that you post **** and it's pulled apart, you claim that it hasn't, refuse to discuss it and attempt to move on.
Utterly dishonest and ignorant. Not interested.
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
Nope. You're not doing it again.
You're merely attempting to dishonestly preach your bullshit to people on here and run from any actual discussion.
Any time that you post **** and it's pulled apart, you claim that it hasn't, refuse to discuss it and attempt to move on.
Utterly dishonest and ignorant. Not interested.
Click to expand...

So you're still just stuck on diverting the topic away from the funding. Fair enough. <ok>
 
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
Another fascinating incite on the EU situation. <ok>
Click to expand...
It is quite staggering that anyone can really believe that George Soros is somehow in the same league of badness as the KKK and that anyone who supports Clinton against Trump is somehow hypocritical because of that. I'll give you a clue: one is an organisation that murders people based on the colour of their skin and the other is a successful financier who has given millions to good causes.
I know that Clinton may not have been the ideal candidate but to pretend that she is a criminal is absurd. It's like going to a dinner on the conference circuit which is normally rubber chicken. In this case you get offered another dish: the plate of **** covered in broken glass. Your response would be to have that because the chicken wasn't free range.
 
  • Like
Reactions: steveninaster1, NSIS and PleaseNotPoll
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
So you're still just stuck on diverting the topic away from the funding. Fair enough. <ok>
Click to expand...
What would be the point? I'd ask for proof and you'd either fail to provide it and blame me or use some **** source.
Then I'd explain why you're wrong and demonstrate the inaccuracies of your claims.
You'd deflect onto something else, say that someone else was worse, insult me and flounce onto another subject.

You've repeatedly posted stuff that's utterly, factually, objectively false and not budged an inch on any of it.
Why would anyone want to repeat the same **** on another subject?
 
PowerSpurs said:
It is quite staggering that anyone can really believe that George Soros is somehow in the same league of badness as the KKK and that anyone who supports Clinton against Trump is somehow hypocritical because of that. I'll give you a clue: one is an organisation that murders people based on the colour of their skin and the other is a successful financier who has given millions to good causes.
I know that Clinton may not have been the ideal candidate but to pretend that she is a criminal is absurd. It's like going to a dinner on the conference circuit which is normally rubber chicken. In this case you get offered another dish: the plate of **** covered in broken glass. Your response would be to have that because the chicken wasn't free range.
Click to expand...


That's a piss poor deflection and rewriting of events even by your piss poor standards.

Who the **** compared Soros to the KKK? <doh>

BTW, the KKK killed around 3,000 blacks and 1,000 whites in 89 years. Black on black gun crime hits similar numbers every 6 months. Soros helps Black Lives Matters which is diverting attention away from this serious problem.
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
What would be the point? I'd ask for proof and you'd either fail to provide it and blame me or use some **** source.
Then I'd explain why you're wrong and demonstrate the inaccuracies of your claims.
You'd deflect onto something else, say that someone else was worse, insult me and flounce onto another subject.

You've repeatedly posted stuff that's utterly, factually, objectively false and not budged an inch on any of it.
Why would anyone want to repeat the same **** on another subject?
Click to expand...

I've been trying to follow your diversions in the hope you finally get to a point. Seemingly you were hunting around trying to find something else to be outraged at to divert the topic and hope it looked like someone else doing it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back