The EU debate - Part III

You're just echoing the same **** sources, again. Demonstrate that he's a Nazi.
Asking someone to back up their claims makes me a hypocrite? In your little safe space, it probably does.

Deflect. Play the victim. Insult. Repeat.
Boring.

 

I'm not, it just doesn't have any relevance. What difference would it make if I were Slovenian, Norwegian or Spanish?

 

The irony in your post is spectacular

 

We were given Gold, Green, Yellow, Red and Silver.

 

Thanks.

 

In what way is it important information to you? Why is there a need to know my heritage?

 

Another spectacularly ironic post. Good work

 

It was in one or more of the videos posted earlier out of his own mouth.

You save me bothering to hunt, as you're going full out to demonstrate the point I was making about hypocrisy.

The attempt to spin the safe space thing only shows it got to you, and probably accounts for you making a fool of yourself trying to prove you're not really a hypocrite.

On the alt right deflection you're so keen on hiding behind, perhaps you could apply the same standards to left leaning sites? Somehow I doubt it. You'll squeal some other deflection instead.

 

Soros called himself a Nazi? Feel free to post the video, then. There's been a lot of things posted on here.
You won't, though. You'll just deflect, again.

The safe space thing has been part of the alt-right for ages. They criticise it and do it themselves.
The Donald on Reddit is very open about it, for example. No dissent allowed. The irony escapes them.

There's a distinct difference between credible right-wing sources and the alt-right.
It's one that they've created themselves, as they coined the phrase and intentionally put themselves apart.
You probably didn't realise that though, eh?

Deflect. Play the victim. Insult. Repeat.
Boring.

 

Something that's actually vaguely on topic:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-37978582

Why aren't they calling this bloke the T word? It's the definition of it.
He's clearly a nut and his not guilty plea would appear to confirm that, though I suspect he believes he's a martyr.
The dangers of creating such poisonous, hateful and angry rhetoric, I guess.

I don't understand why they're calling his gun homemade.
It's modified, but it's not like he put it together from some old piping or something.
It was a firearm and it's still one. Odd.

 

Your last line sums you up perfectly. An apologist for a nutter with God delusions. He says on the video he has no remorse about stripping the goods and property off jews heading to the death camps. I was only obeying orders was no defence to the others, why do you offer it to him?

Where have I looked for a safe space? Prove it, in your own time Mr Hypocrite.

 

What on Earth are you talking about? I've not made any statements in that comment about any individuals.
It's impossible for me to have done what you're attributing to me.

So, as I suspected, you're attempting to call Soros a Nazi because he pretended to be a Christian to avoid the death camps as a child.
That's typically classy of you. Well done.
I'll post a counter to it from within your echo-chamber, as you might pay attention, then:
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald...ge_soros_helping_nazis_was_the_happiest_time/

From the top comment:
"Wait, what? This makes no sense at all.

• Soros was not "in charge" of confiscating land from anyone. He was 14 years old, that doesn't make any sense. What happened was he went into hiding with an employee at the Hungarian Ministry of Agriculture. That employee had to do an inventory of one wealthy Jewish family who had escaped earlier, and he took Soros along. That's hardly being in charge of anything.
  
  
• Soros never helped the nazis. In fact, the one job they ever gave him was handing out deportation notices. The very next day, he fled and went into hiding.
  
  
• In this video he never says it was a great time because he helped nazis, but because it was a time of great self-confidence and faith in his family.
  
  
• This page only links to a facebook page. Couldn't they at least bother to include a link to the interview or whatever this came from? Unless of course this was taken out of context and whoever made this doesn't want you to know about it.
  
  
• Again, how ****ing stupid do you think people are to believe a progressive, philanthropic Jewish-Hungarian not only worked for the nazis, but also goes on record saying he loved it? Quite frankly it's insulting."

Your comments and links all come from the same alt-right safe spaces.
You've given the evidence yourself.

Deflect. Play the victim. Insult. Repeat.
Boring.

 

Deflect. Play the victim. Insult, Repeat. Boring in deed, and a decent summary of your wordy replies with quotes that I haven't used.

So now you finally comment, you defend George Soros. That's cleared that up...finally.

 

I didn't defend Soros, I pointed out that what you were accusing him of was bullshit and demonstrated why.
I even did it using one of your own crappy sources.
And what's your response? Nothing. Less than nothing. You're actually criticising me for telling the truth.
No attempt to counter it. No admission of fault for the false accusation. No self-awareness at all.

 

Its called Selective Exposure Syndrome. Where by people only digest the evidence that backs up their pre-existing ideals and unconsciously ignore anything that contradicts said ideals, even when the evidence is heavily against their beliefs.

 

Mainly because you write so much guff, it's virtually impossible to work out what point you're trying to make.

So you now DON'T defend Soros. Fair enough.

 

Deflect. Play the victim. Insult. Repeat.
Boring.

 

You're another one whose posts are better when you summarise them like that.

You've done your bit in drifting the topic, and highlighting the hypocrisy shown by a fair few on here and then trying to claim it's others deflecting. Cheers for that.

 

When will you all realise that Dull will say anything to keep the conversation going and fill his empty existence?

 

It's always you doing the defecting, diverting, etc. You've been asked to back up your assertions and have failed time and again to do so. Why? Quite simply, you can't....

I'm not sure if you're just too thick to think that nobody notices what you constantly do; Or whether you just do it because you find it impossible to accept that you're wrong, and the other guy has a valid point.