The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
petersaxton said:
I think he was hoping you would watch the video
not act like he's supporting all the comments
Click to expand...


<laugh> Watch the ****ing video? Only right wing psychos watch **** like that. The internet is awash with poisonous conspiracy theory crap, and ****s like your mate are daft enough to lap it up. The soppy sod has probably read Mein Kampf as well, just for research you understand. No normal person would bother, anymore than any normal person would put their head in a cesspool.
 
Watford_R said:
Given I've been posting on this thread, I've been able to use the internet for some time. Poor effort, even by your exceptionally and increasingly low standards.
Click to expand...
You only need to look at Kustard's sig to see that he's on the verge of a breakdown.

Stan's being mean to me! <wah>

<laugh>
 
So some on here reject the democratically elected red candidate, partly because an extremist group, the KKK, created by the democrats to help keep black people down, said they endorse him, yet he described that as repulsive.

They support the blue candidate, even though they're endorsed and funded by a wealthy close friend, with a self confessed God complex, who believes normal rules don't apply to them, and has a history of creating civil unrest and funding groups aimed at undemocratic civil unrest. To add to the CV, he's an unrepentant nazi collaborator who stripped jews of their possessions, and has several international arrest warrants out on him.

Thank **** they lost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petersaxton and Born again Humanitarian
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
So some on here reject the democratically elected red candidate, partly because an extremist group, the KKK, created by the democrats to help keep black people down, said they endorse him, yet he described that as repulsive.

They support the blue candidate, even though they're endorsed and funded by a wealthy close friend, with a self confessed God complex, who believes normal rules don't apply to them, and has a history of creating civil unrest and funding groups aimed at undemocratic civil unrest. To add to the CV, he's an unrepentant nazi collaborator who stripped jews of their possessions, and has several international arrest warrants out on him.

Thank **** they lost.
Click to expand...

Your view is so subverted as to miss the truth completely. The Southern Democrats joined the Republican Party when the 1964 Civil rights Act was signed. So since that point the Democrats you blame for the KKK have been part of the Republican establishment.


I'm looking at who the red candidate selects to his team and what his policies will be rather than playing who used the dirtiest money.

So far a creationist for education and a climate change denier for environment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PleaseNotPoll, Page_Moss_Kopite and Bodinki
steveninaster1 said:
Your view is so subverted as to miss the truth completely. The Southern Democrats joined the Republican Party when the 1964 Civil rights Act was signed. So since that point the Democrats you blame for the KKK have been part of the Republican establishment.


I'm looking at who the red candidate selects to his team and what his policies will be rather than playing who used the dirtiest money.

So far a creationist for education and a climate change denier for environment.
Click to expand...

Was just about to point that very fact out. <ok>
Saved me typing :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: steveninaster1
Hull City AFC (DMD) said:
So some on here reject the democratically elected red candidate, partly because an extremist group, the KKK, created by the democrats to help keep black people down, said they endorse him, yet he described that as repulsive.

They support the blue candidate, even though they're endorsed and funded by a wealthy close friend, with a self confessed God complex, who believes normal rules don't apply to them, and has a history of creating civil unrest and funding groups aimed at undemocratic civil unrest. To add to the CV, he's an unrepentant nazi collaborator who stripped jews of their possessions, and has several international arrest warrants out on him.

Thank **** they lost.
Click to expand...
It seems that the size of font is more important to lefties!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
petersaxton said:
It seems that the size of font is more important to lefties!
Click to expand...
Hillary Clinton is not a leftie.
As has been pointed out many times, her politics are far more in line with the Tories.
Over here she would almost certainly be considered right wing.

America's right is batshit compared to ours.
They are Pro Gun, Anti Abortion, Anti Same Sex marriage etc.
Even with a so called Right Wing government, in this country, we legalised same sex marriage.
Would never happen in the states under the GOP
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back