The EU debate - Part III

that is totally missing my point

 

I know it wasn't your point.
Was just saying

 

It's you missing the truth, I didn't mention which party they may or may not ally themselves to now, I said which one created them and why.

It's good to see you keeping up the tradition on how support is justified.

 

So you don't think that's relevant, that all those racists switched parties?
Jesus, talk about selective information.

 

Which party created the KKK is irrelevant to today's situation and you clearly brought it in to support a false position.

US politics is full of dirty money and self interest regardless of which party is on control and support will be justified or not by actions once in power.

 

BECAUSE IT SCARES STAN

 

... it's quite funny that most of Pete's sources emanate from the Daily Mail ... thereby almost immediately rendering obsolete any prospect of the article being taken seriously by anyone with a modicum of intelligence ...

 

... might I humbly suggest you change your board name to Sir Mel E Trump .... somehow more fitting

 

In your opinion it's irrelevant, in my opinion, it's not a false position.

The point is people have a dig at Trump for the KKK support, even though he rejects it and publicly says he finds it repulsive, but on here, that's not good enough.

Soros publicly says he wants to be a megalomaniac, says he has a God complex, fears he has mental health issues, has demonstrated he influences regimes and countries for self serving, undemocratic reasons, yet on here, that's seemingly acceptable.

That is clearly hypocrisy.

 

May I humbly suggest, you go away

 

Whether Trump rejects KKK support or not isn't really the issue. It's that they see him as most representing of their views.

Must confess I haven't seen the quotes you are attributing to Soros, but it doesn't surprise me.

 

But as Trump rejects them as strongly as some on here, posters on here used that as stick to beat Trump, so THEY gave it relevance.

The fact they don't apply the same standard to Clinton speaks volumes.

 

I think he means the fact that they endorse him means that they agree with his policies.
Anything the KKK agree with his obviously not going to be good. Therefore any policy the KKK agree with is bad.

I personally hold Clinton to the same standard, and feel she was wholly inappropriate as a Presidential candidate, as was Trump.
The people were crying out for Anti Establishment politics. They kinda got it in a sense. But it won't take long for Trump to be corrupted by it all, he is a businessman first and foremost.
Sanders was the way forward. But the DNC dicked him over. So they deserve everything they get for going against the will of their base.
****ing delegate twats!

 

Or the KKK could be true to their roots and causing g mischief for Trump. Either way, he rejected them out of hand, but some on here ignore that, along with the support for Clinton from a far more reprehensible carachter who is liable to be capable of acting out his fantasies.

Speculation is Soros played a hand in Sanders losing.

 

Unfortunately he's still struggling with "the".

 

Can you believe it...I even saw an article in the Daily Mail that was saying good stuff about Leicester City FC last season! Un-fecking-believable

 

... as you say ... although the journalism was remarkably poor compared to more credible newspapers and even such tomes as Socialist Workers Party News, Greggs And The Sensible Man and Attila The Hun Was A Tory ...

 

... can I take that as a maybe?

 

When did I deny saying that you posted links to alt-right crap that often contained anti-Semitic comments?
You do. A lot.

The claim about protesters being bussed in was in the Youtube video that you posted, using that evidence.
Do you even watch the crap that you link to?

 

And yours actually happened, in all likelyhood. Trump's didn't.
He used it as an excuse to avoid having to actually do some work, for once in his life.