Right then ladies, As you seem to have been squealing and screeching, despite me saying I'd reply when I had more time, you can have this quick reply instead.
Let's look at what was posted, rather than the bullshit and bollocks that wurzle's trying to claim.
It's hard to keep up on here, what with some lauding the legal challenge that'll stall or prevent it and saying the finance houses are leaving despite this, so seemingly have no confidence in the legal challenge, and all when sod all has actually happened so far.
Such a flimsy system is better off dismantled and replaced with something more robust and with less excitable reactionaries involved.
The first part, so far nothing has actually happened, we're still in the EU for all of its failings. Yet some are posting articles of doom and gloom about the financial institutions getting in a flap. Some have a basis in truth, others are simply 'wishful' thinking. The fact some are in such a tizz, when in reality nothing has changed, is hardly a demonstration of a robust system.
The duplicity is that, some are getting giddy about the pending court case, which seemingly the institutions heading for the EU (or at least claimed to be) don't seem to have much confidence in a successful outcome for, or they'd keep here as they have been. It can't be glee that the case is running and glee that people are supposedly leaving.
Remain is a misnomer, as there is little doubt that the controlling groups would have seen any vote to remain as a green light for further centralisation. It wouldn't matter how close as there'd be no second referendum, we'd be totally in. We don't know what form the EU would take, but it's nailed on it wouldn't be as it has been.
The second bit is my view that the current financial system globally (not just the EU or UK) is doomed to a boom and bust cycle. It pretty much has to as it's built on debt and false finance run by middle men. The problems we face aren't all down to Brexit, the problem more relates to the current economic model that drives the global market, and drips down to a national and local level.
It's a fragile system, as recent and historical events here and abroad show. The panic at the mere thought that something could happen in the future shows that fragility. We live life on tick, which feeds the nervousness.
As you lacked the patience for me to post a more complete version of my own views, and rather than just blather on, I've had a quick look for articles from magazines the remainers quote that go some way to support the basic claim that the industry knows it's ****ed up, but doesn't know how to solve it.
In a recent lecture, Paul Krugman, winner of the Nobel prize in economics in 2008, argued that much of the past 30 years of macroeconomics was “spectacularly useless at best, and positively harmful at worst.” Barry Eichengreen, a prominent American economic historian, says the crisis (in 2008) has “cast into doubt much of what we thought we knew about economics.”
http://www.economist.com/node/14031376
http://www.economist.com/node/14030288
http://www.economist.com/node/14030296
http://www.economist.com/blogs/buttonwood/2015/05/finance-and-economics
No doubt someone will now tell me what I really think.
