The EU debate - Part III

[Stan]

You must log in or register to see images

 

[Stan]

You must log in or register to see images

 

[NSIS]

He's out of his depth.

He makes idiotic comments and then can't respond with anything of substance when they're ripped to shreds.

So he starts his deflection and bore them into submission tack. Rinse and repeat.

He'd do better to admit he was talking out his arse and we could move on - but the 'mighty' Dutch doesn't do wrong - ask the Hull board.

He's got to be the most boring, thickheaded twat I've encountered in a long time!

 

[Archers Road]

I've got some codeine and diazepam left over from when I slipped a disc.

Might need something a bit stronger. I've got some vodka and tramadol left over from when I was a degenerate drunk.

 

[Stan]

I've just realised that I have no idea what the football allegiances of Archers Road or steveinaster are and I've been talking to them on a football forum for 3 months.

 

[pieguts]

You're kind of making the point that gets ignored. We haven't left yet.

In this case I'm with Tobes. If he has misinterpreted what you are alluding too, surely it can't be that difficult for you too explain it?

 

[Archers Road]

I've just realised that I have no idea what the football allegiances of Archers Road or steveinaster are and I've been talking to them on a football forum for 3 months.

You must log in or register to see media

 

[DMD]

The irony of you posting a straw man in reply to my post, when your assertion that posters was being duplicitous was exactly that, is hilarious.

You were definitely right when you admitted you're a thick **** the other day.

Don't participate if you can't make a structured argument and defend your posts with something meaningful

You're posting a strawman argument. because you're trying to shift away from the purpose of my reply, to one of your own invention. You do it on a regular basis. It's why you can't grasp why you 'win' so few discussions.

 

[DMD]

Yawn.

Make that 8 posts without being able to explain why I was somehow wrong to make a glib joke about your supposed alternative to a free market economy

You still can't explain what that alternative is, as you patently haven't got a ****ing clue and need to consult the Icke files for some 'inspiration'

Yawn away **** for brains.

You're desperately trying to claim a 'victory' on something I wasn't particularly arguing. You've simply tried your usual ploy of trying to state something people aren't actually saying, and then claiming it's wrong.

 

[DMD]

You cretin!

The two things I posted are plain simple facts. Only a deluded ****wit, like you, would try to deny it!

You really get more boring and facile by the day.

So what? It's no good trying to limit what was posted to your own narrow agenda, and then claiming some sort of 'victory'.

 

[steveninaster1]

So what? It's no good trying to limit what was posted to your own narrow agenda, and then claiming some sort of 'victory'.

Why don't you explain your position and what your preferred alternative is for people like me who have no idea what point you were originally trying to make.

You said duplicitous, how so?
You said a new robust structure, what did you have in mind?

 

[DMD]

He's out of his depth.

He makes idiotic comments and then can't respond with anything of substance when they're ripped to shreds.

So he starts his deflection and bore them into submission tack. Rinse and repeat.

He'd do better to admit he was talking out his arse and we could move on - but the 'mighty' Dutch doesn't do wrong - ask the Hull board.

You're at it again Wurzle.

I told you several times, that I'll answer later, because your attempted Paxman style doesn't lend itself to shorter exchanges.

 

[DMD]

Why don't you explain your position and what your preferred alternative is for people like me who have no idea what point you were originally trying to make.

You said duplicitous, how so?
You said a new robust structure, what did you have in mind?

Have a read of the replies to Wurzle.

 

[paultheplug]

He's out of his depth.

He makes idiotic comments and then can't respond with anything of substance when they're ripped to shreds.

So he starts his deflection and bore them into submission tack. Rinse and repeat.

He'd do better to admit he was talking out his arse and we could move on - but the 'mighty' Dutch doesn't do wrong - ask the Hull board.

What he is saying is that the Express/Mail have not yet come up with a headline that will set us all off in a different direction and forget about his lack of response

 

[steveninaster1]

Have a read of the replies to Wurzle.

OK,
I look forward to reading your answers later

 

[armchairblue]

I've got some codeine and diazepam left over from when I slipped a disc.

How did you manage that?..You're obviously not a physical sort of bloke.

 

[paultheplug]

How did you manage that?..You're obviously not a physical sort of bloke.

He fell off his chair laughing at Hull in part one of the EU debate.

 

[armchairblue]

He fell off his chair laughing at Hull in part one of the EU debate.

Either that or tripped over his teapot.

 

[Archers Road]

You're posting a strawman argument. because you're trying to shift away from the purpose of my reply, to one of your own invention. You do it on a regular basis. It's why you can't grasp why you 'win' so few discussions.

No, that's not what's happening. He's been trying unsuccessfully to get you to clarify something you said, and you've been wriggling like an eel on the hook. Hope this helps

 

[Stan]

How did you manage that?..You're obviously not a physical sort of bloke.

I just didn't use all the pills so still have some left over. Simple really.